Beyond eurocentrism in the intercultural field: Searching for an asiacentric paradigm

Ferment in the Intercultural Field: Axiology/Value/Praxis

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 243-276

  Miike, Yoshitaka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645233118     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452229720.n9     Document Type: Chapter

References (103)

1. Asante, M. K. (1983). The ideological significance of Afrocentricity in intercultural communication. Journal of Black Studies, 14(1), 3-19. doi:10.1177/002193478301400101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002193478301400101
2. Asante, M. K. (1988). Afrocentricity: The theory of social change (Rev. ed.). Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
3. Asante, M. K. (1990). Kemet, Afrocentricity and knowledge. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
4. Asante, M. K. (1996). Are you scared of your shadow? A critique of Sidney Lemelle’s "The Politics of Cultural Existence."Journal of Black Studies, 26(4), 524-533. doi:10.1177/002193479602600409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002193479602600409
5. Asante, M. K. (1998a). Foreword. In J. D. Hamlet (Ed.), Afrocentric visions: Studies in culture and communication (pp. vii-ix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Asante, M. K. (1998b). The Afrocentric idea (Rev. ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
7. Asante, M. K. (1999a). An Afrocentric communication theory. In J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 552-562). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Asante, M. K. (1999b). The painful demise of Eurocentrism: An Afrocentric response to critics. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
9. Asante, M. K., & Vora, E. (1983). Toward multiple philosophical approaches. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory: Current perspectives (pp. 293-298). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Befu, H. (2000, June). English-language intellectual imperialism and its consequences. Intercultural Communication, 37, 1. (Chiba, Japan: Intercultural Communication Institute, Kanda University of International Studies)
11. Bharucha, R. (2001). Under the sign of "Asia": Rethinking "creative unity" beyond the "rebirth of traditional arts."Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 2(1), 151-156. doi:10.1080/14649370120039560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649370120039560
12. Chen, G.-M. (1993, November). Communication competence: A Chinese perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
13. Chen, G.-M. (1994, November). A conceptualization and measurement of communication competence: A Chinese perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
14. Chen, G.-M. (1998). A Chinese model of human relationship development. In B. L. Hoffer & J. H. Hoo (Eds.), Cross-cultural communication East and West in the 90‘s (pp. 45-53). San Antonio, TX: Trinity University, Institute for Cross-Cultural Research.
15. Chen, G.-M. (2001). Toward transcultural understanding: A harmony theory of Chinese communication. In V. H. Milhouse, M. K. Asante, & P. O. Nwosu (Eds.), Transcultural realities: Interdisciplinary perspectives on cross-cultural relations (pp. 55-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452229430 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229430
16. Chen, G.-M., & Ma, R. (Eds.). (2002). Chinese conflict management and resolution. Westport, CT: Ablex.
17. Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. In B. B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 19, pp. 353-383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (1998). Foundations of intercultural communication. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19. Cheng, C.-Y. (1987). Chinese philosophy and contemporary human communication theory. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 23-43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Chu, G. C. (1988). In search of an Asian perspective of communication theory. In W. Dissanayake (Ed.), Communication theory: The Asian perspective (pp. 204-210). Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
21. Cushman, D. P., & Kincaid, D. L. (1987). Introduction and initial insights. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 1-10). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Deshpande, S. (2001). Making "Asia" mean: Towards a response to Sun Ge. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 2(1), 145-150. doi:10.1080/14649370120039551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649370120039551
23. Dissanayake, W. (1983). The communication significance of the Buddhist concept of dependent co-origination. In L. Nordstrom (Ed.), Communication-East and West [Special issue]. Communication, 8(1), 29-45.
24. Dissanayake, W. (1987). The guiding image in Indian culture and its implications for communication. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 151-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Dissanayake, W. (Ed.). (1988a). Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
26. Dissanayake, W. (1988b). The need for Asian approaches to communication. In W. Dissanayake (Ed.), Communication theory: The Asian perspective (pp. 1-19). Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
27. Dissanayake, W. (1989). Paradigm dialogue: A Europocentric universe of discourse. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 1. Paradigm issues (pp. 166-168). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Dissanayake, W. (1996). Cultural studies: The challenges ahead for Asian scholars. Comparative Literature and Culture Bulletin, 1, 2-19. (Hong Kong, China: Comparative Literature Program, Research Institute for the Humanities, Chinese University of Hong Kong)
29. Gandhi, M. (1923). Young India, 1919-1922. New York: B. W. Huebsch.
30. Georgoudi, M., & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). The emergence of contextualism: A commentary on "Ferment in the Field."Journal of Communication, 35(1), 76-88. doi:10.1111/jcom.1985.35.issue-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcom.1985.35.issue-1
31. Goonasekera, A., & Kuo, E. C. Y. (2000). Foreword: Towards an Asian theory of communication? Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2), vii-xii.
32. Hall, B. J. (1997). Theories of culture, communication and context. In J. L. Owen (Ed.), Context and communication behavior (pp. 111-132). Reno, NV: Context Press.
33. Hamaguchi, E. (1985). A contextual model of the Japanese: Toward a methodological innovation in Japan studies (S. Kumon & M. R. Creighton, Trans.). Journal of Japanese Studies, 11(2), 289-321. doi:10.2307/132562 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/132562
34. Hamaguchi, E. (1997). A methodological basis for Japanese studies: With regard to "relatum" as its foundation. Japan Review, 9, 41-63. (Kyoto, Japan: International Research Center for Japanese Studies)
35. Hamlet, J. D. (Ed.). (1998). Afrocentric visions: Studies in culture and communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Ho, D. Y. F. (1982). Asian concepts in behavioral science. Psychologia, 25(4), 228-235. (Kyoto, Japan: Psychologia Society, Kyoto University)
37. Ho, D. Y. F. (1988). Asian psychology: A dialogue on indigenization and beyond. In A. C. Paranjpe, D. Y. F. Ho, & R. W. Rieber (Eds.), Asian contributions to psychology (pp. 53-77). New York: Praeger.
38. Ho, D. Y. F. (1991). Relational orientation and methodological relationalism. Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society, 26/27, 81-95. (Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong Psychological Society, University of Hong Kong)
39. Ho, D. Y. F. (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural contexts (pp. 240-259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Ho, D. Y. F. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrast with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25(2), 115-139. doi:10.1111/jtsb.1995.25.issue-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.1995.25.issue-2
41. Ho, D. Y. F. (1998a). Indigenous psychologies: Asian perspectives. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(1), 88-103. doi:10.1177/0022022198291005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022022198291005
42. Ho, D. Y. F. (1998b). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 1-16. doi:10.1111/ajsp.1998.1.issue-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.1998.1.issue-1
43. Hwang, K.-K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(2), 155-178. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00124
44. Irwin, H. (1996). Communicating with Asia: Understanding people and customs. New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
45. Ishii, S. (1984). Enryo-sasshi communication: A key to understanding Japanese interpersonal relations. Cross Currents, 11(1), 49-58. (Kanagawa, Japan: Language Institute of Japan)
46. Ishii, S. (1998). Developing a Buddhisten-based systems paradigm for the study of Japanese human relationships Japan Review, 10, 109-122. (Kyoto, Japan: International Research Center for Japanese Studies)
47. Ishii, S. (2001a). An emerging rationale for triworld communication studies from Buddhist perspectives. Human Communication, 4(1), 1-10.
48. Ishii, S. (2001b). The Japanese welcome-nonwelcome ambivalence syndrome toward marebito/ijin/gaijin strangers: Its implications for intercultural communication research. Japan Review, 13, 145-170. (Kyoto, Japan: International Research Center for Japanese Studies)
49. Ishii, S., Klopf, D. W., & Cooke, P. (2003). Our locus in the universe: Worldview and intercultural communication. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (10th ed., pp. 28-35). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
50. Jayawardena, R. D. K. (1986). Communication theory: The Buddhist viewpoint. Media Asia, 13(1), 29-31. (Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center)
51. Jensen, J. V. (1992). Values and practices in Asian argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 28(4), 153-166.
52. Kang, K.-W., & Pearce, W. B. (1983). Reticence: A transcultural analysis. In L. Nordstrom (Ed.), Communication-East and West [Special issue]. Communication, 8(1), 79-106.
53. Katriel, T. (1995). From "context" to "contexts" in intercultural communication research. In R. L. Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 271-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Mapping the domain of intercultural communication: An overview. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 24, pp. 139-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Intercultural personhood: An integration of Eastern and Western perspectives. In L. A. Samovar & R. E. Porter (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (10th ed., pp. 436-448). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
56. Kincaid, D. L. (1987a). Communication East and West: Points of departure. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 331-340). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Kincaid, D. L. (Ed.). (1987b). Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
58. Kume, T. (1996). The "mawashi" style in Japanese decision-making: A case study. Japanese Society, 1, 41-60. (Ibaragi, Japan: Japanese Society Research Institute)
59. Kume, T. (1997, August). Decision-making in Japan: Two communication styles of contemporary Japanese organizations. Paper presented at the East-West Center Internationalization Forum, Honolulu, HI.
60. Lu, X. (1998a). An interface between individualistic and collectivistic orientations in Chinese cultural values and social relations. Howard Journal of Communications, 9(2), 91-107. doi:10.1080/106461798247032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/106461798247032
61. Lu, X. (1998b). Rhetoric in ancient China, fifth to third century B.C.E.: A comparison of classical Greek rhetoric. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
62. Martin, J. N., & Nakayama, T. K. (1999). Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theory, 9(1), 1-25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00160.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00160.x
63. Matsumoto, K., Iriye, A., & Onuma, Y. (2001). East Asian regionalism in an age of globalization. Japan Echo, 28(1), 18-22. (Tokyo, Japan: Japan Echo Inc.)
64. Miike, Y. (2000, August). Toward an Asian standpoint of communication theory: Some initial assumptions. Paper presented at the Pacific and Asian Communication Association Convention, "Waves of Change: The Future of Scholarship in Communication and Culture," Honolulu, HI.
65. Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing culture and communication in the Asian context: An assumptive foundation. In G.-M. Chen (Ed.), Culture and communication: An East Asian perspective [Special issue]. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(1), 1-21.
66. Miike, Y. (2003). Japanese enryo-sasshi communication and the psychology of amae: Reconsideration and reconceptualization. Keio Communication Review, 25, 3-25. (Tokyo, Japan: Institute for Media and Communications Research, Keio University)
67. Mills, I. (1983). Taoism and communi-action. In L. Nordstrom (Ed.), Communication-East and West [Special issue]. Communication, 8(1), 59-77.
68. Morikawa, S. (2001). The significance of Afrocentricity for non-Africans: Examinations of the relationship between African Americans and the Japanese. Journal of Black Studies, 31(4), 423-436. doi:10.1177/002193470103100403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002193470103100403
69. Nadamitsu, Y., Chen, L., & Friedrich, G. (1998). Chinese in Japan: Encounters with a different group consciousness. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11, 53-84. (Chiba, Japan: Intercultural Communication Institute, Kanda University of International Studies)
70. Nadamitsu, Y., Chen, L., & Friedrich, G. (2001). Similar or different?: The Chinese experience of Japanese culture. In M. J. Collier (Eds.), Constituting cultural difference through discourse (pp. 158-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Nakamura, H. (1964). Ways of thinking of Eastern peoples: India, China, Tibet, Japan (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
72. Nakayama, E. (1990). Natsume Soseki in England: The meaning of his encounter with the West. Journal of Comparative Literature, 32, 211-228. (Tokyo, Japan: Japan Comparative Literature Association)
73. Nishiyama, K. (2001, March). A new challenge to intercultural communication scholars and researchers. Intercultural Communication, 39, 1-2. (Chiba, Japan: Intercultural Communication Institute, Kanda University of International Studies)
74. Nordstrom, L. (1979). Zen and the non-duality of communication: The sound of one hand clapping. Communication, 4(1), 15-27.
75. Nordstrom, L. (Ed.). (1983). Communication-East and West [Special issue]. Communication, 8(1), 1-132.
76. Oliver, R. T. (1971). Communication and culture in ancient India and China. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
77. Oliver, R. T. (1989). Leadership in Asia: Persuasive communication in the making of nations, 1850-1950. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press.
78. O-Young, L. (2001). The dawn of the Asian century. Japan Echo, 28(1), 23-28. (Tokyo, Japan: Japan Echo, Inc.)
79. Schramm, W. (1983). The unique perspective of communication: A retrospective view. In G. Gerbner (Ed.), Ferment in the field [Special issue]. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 6-17. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02401.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02401.x
80. Schreiber, L. (2000). Overcoming methodological elitism: Afrocentrism as a prototypical paradigm for intercultural research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24(5), 651-671. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(00)00021-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767%2800%2900021-3
81. Shuter, R. (1990). The centrality of culture. Southern Communication Journal, 55(3), 237-249. doi:10.1080/10417949009372792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949009372792
82. Shuter, R. (1998). Revisiting the centrality of culture. In J. N. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, & L. A. Flores (Eds.), Readings in cultural contexts (pp. 38-48). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
83. Sinha, D. (1981). Non-Western perspectives in psychology: Why, what, and whither?Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(2), 1-9.
84. Sinha, D. (1998). Changing perspectives in social psychology in India: A journey towards indigenization. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(1), 17-31. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00003
85. Starosta, W. J. (1989). Ceteris paribus in the global village: A research agenda for intercultural communication theory building. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 12, pp. 310-314). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
86. Starosta, W. J. (1993). Re-centering culture within communication studies. Arizona Communication Association Journal, 19(1), 19-25.
87. Starosta, W. J. (2000). On the intersection of rhetoric and intercultural communication: A 25-year personal retrospective. In A. González & D. V. Tanno (Eds.), Rhetoric in intercultural contexts (pp. 149-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88. Starosta, W. J. (2001). Afrocentric voice, White noise [Review of the bookAfrocentric visions: Studies in culture and communication]. Contemporary Psychology, 46(3), 242-244.
89. Starosta, W. J., & Chen, G.-M. (2001, July). Culture as centrism. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the World Communication Association, Santander, Spain.
90. Sun, G. (2000a). How does Asia mean? (Part 1, S.-L. Hui & K. Lau, Trans.). Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(1), 13-47. doi:10.1080/146493700360980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/146493700360980
91. Sun, G. (2000b). How does Asia mean? (Part 2, S.-L. Hui & K. Lau, Trans.). Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1(2), 319-341. doi:10.1080/14649370050141186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649370050141186
92. Thayer, L. (1983). "Realizing": Observations on the anti-philosophical state of the study of communication in Anglo-America. Communication, 7(2), 135-149.
93. Thayer, L. (1987). On communication: Essays in understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
94. Thayer, L. (1997). Pieces: Toward a revisioning of communication/life. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
95. Ting-Toomey, S. (1989). Culture and interpersonal relationship development: Some conceptual issues. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 12, pp. 371-382). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
96. Wang, G., & Shen, V. (2000). East, West, communication and theory: Searching for the meaning of searching for Asian communication theories. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2), 14-32. doi:10.1080/01292980009364782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01292980009364782
97. Wong, P., Manvi, M., & Wong, T. H. (1995). Asiacentrism and Asian American studies?Amerasia Journal, 21(1/2), 137-147.
98. Yum, J. O. (1987). The practice of uye-ri in interpersonal relationships. In D. L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives (pp. 87-100). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
99. Yum, J. O. (1988). The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs, 55(4), 374-388. doi:10.1080/03637758809376178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758809376178
100. Yum, J. O. (1989). The communication network paradigm and intercultural communication. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, & E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication: Vol. 2. Paradigm exemplars (pp. 486-496). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
101. Yum, J. O. (1993, November). Communication competence: A Korean perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
102. Yum, J. O. (1994, November). A conceptualization and measurement of communication competence: A Korean perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
103. Ziegler, D. (Ed.). (1995). Molefi Kete Asante and Afrocentricity: In praise and in criticism. Nashville, TN: James C. Winston.