The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender

Field Methods

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 107-128

  Seale, Clive ^a   Charteris Black, Jonathan ^b   Dumelow, Carol ^c   Locock, Louise ^c   Ziebland, Sue ^c  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative keyword analysis; Experience of illness; Gender difference; Joint interviewing

Indexed keywords

EID: 57749132020     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X07313837     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allan, G. 1980. A note on interviewing spouses together. Journal of Marriage and the Family 42 (1): 205-10.
2. Arksey, S. 1996. Collecting data through joint interviews. Social Research Update 15. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU15.html (accessed January 9, 2008).
3. Barbour, R. S., and J. Kitzinger. 1999. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice. London: Sage.
4. Boeije, H. R. 2004. And then there were three: Self-presentational styles and the presence of the partner as a third person in the interview. Field Methods 16 (1): 3-22.
5. Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
6. Cameron, D. 2003. Gender and language ideologies. In The handbook of language and gender, edited by J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff, 447-67. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
7. Coates, J. 1996. Women talk: Conversation between women friends. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
8. Coates, J. 2002. Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
9. Coates, J. 2004. Women, men and language. London: Pearson/Longman.
10. Coates, J. 2005. Masculinity, collaborative narration and the heterosexual couple. In The sociolinguistics of narrative, edited by J. Thornbarrow and J. Coates, 89-106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Crowdy, S. 1995. The BNC spoken corpus. In Spoken English on computer: Transcription, mark-up and application, edited by G. Leech, G. Myers, and J. Thomas, 224-34. London: Longman.
12. Gray, R., M. Fitch, C. Davis, and C. Phillips. 1996. Breast cancer and prostate cancer self-help groups: Reflections on differences. Psycho-oncology 5 (2): 137-42.
13. Gubrium, J. F., and J. A. Holstein. 2002. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Heritage, J. 2004. Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, edited by D. Silverman, 222-45. London: Sage.
15. Holmes, J. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
16. Jackson, L., K. Ervin, P. Gardner, and N. Schmitt. 2001. Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 44 (5-6): 363-79.
17. Kiss, A., and S. Meryn. 2001. Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer. British Medical Journal 323 (7320): 1055-58.
18. Kitzinger, J. 1994. The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1): 103-21.
19. Klemm, P., M. Hurst, S. L. Dearholt, and S. R. Trone. 1999. Cyber solace: Gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Computers in Nursing 17 (2): 65-72.
20. Locock, L., and J. Alexander. 2006. Just a bystander? Men's place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine 62 (6): 1349-59.
21. Morris, S. M. 2001. Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qualitative Health Research 11 (4): 553-67.
22. Radley, A., and M. Billig. 1996. Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health and Illness 18 (2): 220-40.
23. Rayson, P., G. Leech, and M. Hodges. 1997. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2 (1): 133-52.
24. Rose, D., and D. J. Pevalin. 2005. The national statistics socio-economic classification: Origins, development and use. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
25. Scott, M. 2005. Wordsmith tools 4.0. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version4/ (accessed January 3, 2008).
26. Seale, C. 2006. Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health 10 (3): 345-60.
27. Seale, C., J. Charteris-Black, and S. Ziebland. 2006. Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine 62 (10): 2577-90.
28. Seymour, J., G. Dix, and T. Eardley. 1995. Joint accounts: Methodology and practice in research interviews with couples. York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
29. Street, R. L., and H. Giles. 1982. Speech accommodation theory: A social cognitive approach to language and speech behavior. In Social cognition and communication, edited by M. Roloff and C. R. Berger, 193-226. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.