Goal ambiguity, work complexity, and work routineness in federal agencies

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 284-308

  Lee, Jung Wook ^a   Rainey, Hal G ^b   Chun, Young Han ^c  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Goal ambiguity; Public administration; Public organization theory; Public organizational behavior; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952297833     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074009337620     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Allison, G.T. (1983). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects? In J. L. Perry & K. L. Kraemer (Eds.), Public management (pp. 72-92). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
2. Andrews, R., Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2008). Reconstructing empirical public administration: Lutonism or scientific realism. Administration & Society, 40, 324-330.
3. Bigley, G.A., & Roberts, K.H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1281-1299.
4. Bishop, P.C., & Jones, A.J. (1993). Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Assessing the variables of success. Public Administration Review, 53, 121-128.
5. Boyd, B.K., Dess, G.G., & Raheed, A.M.A. (1993). Divergence between archival and perceptual measures of the environment: Causes and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 18, 204-226.
6. Boyne, G.A., & Walker, R.M. (2004). Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 231-252.
7. Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. (2005a). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 529-558.
8. Chun, Y.H., & Rainey, H.G. (2005b). Goal ambiguity in U.S. federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 1-30.
9. Daft, R.L. (2007). Organization theory and design (9th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
10. Daft, R.L., & Macintosh, N.B. (1981). A tentative exploration into amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 207-224.
11. Dahl, R.A., & Lindblom, C.E. (1953). Politics, economics, and welfare. New York: Harper & Row.
12. Dornbusch, S.M., & Scott, W.C. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. New York: Basic Books.
13. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
14. Drucker, P.F. (1980). The deadly sins in public administration. Public Administration Review, 40, 103-106.
15. Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1999). Delegating powers: A transaction cost politics approach to policy making under separate powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Feldman, M. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Feller, I. (2002). Performance measurement redux. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 435-452.
18. Fiorina, M.P. (1986). Legislative uncertainty, legislative control, and the delegation of legislative power. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, 33-51.
19. Ford, J. (1997). Earnings by level of work: Results from pilot studies of the national compensation survey program. Compensation and Working Conditions, Summer, 24-31.
20. Franklin, A.L. (1999). Managing for results in Arizona: A fifth-year report card. Public Productivity and Management Review, 23, 194-209.
21. Frederickson, H.G., & LaPorte, T.R. (2002). Airport security, high reliability, and the problem of rationality. Public Administration Review, 62, 33-43.
22. Gable, C. (1998). Strategic action planning now! A guide for setting and meeting your goals. New York: St. Lucie.
23. Gillespie, D.F., & Mileti, D.S. (1977). Technology and the study of organization: An overview and appraisal. Academy of Management Review, 2, 7-16.
24. Gormley, W.T. (1989). Taming the bureaucracy: Muscles, prayers, and other strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Gormley, W.T., & Balla, S.J. (2008). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
26. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1969). Routine technology, social structure, and organizational goals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 366-376.
27. Hall, R.H. (2002). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Hargrove, E. C., & Glidewell, J. C. (Eds.). (1990). Impossible jobs in public management. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
29. Hickson, D., Pugh, D., & Pheysey, D. (1969). Operations technology and organizational structure: An empirical reappraisal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 378-397.
30. Hofstede, G. (1981). Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6, 193-211.
31. Hood, C., & Dunsire, A. (1981). Bureaumetrics. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
32. Huber, J.D., & Shipan, C.R. (2002). Deliberate discretion: The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Hulin, C.L., & Roznowski, M. (1985). Organizational technologies: Effects on organizations' characteristics and individual's responses. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 39-85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34. LaPorte, T.R., & Consolini, P.M. (1991). Working in practice but not in theory: Theoretical challenges of high-reliability organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, 19-47.
35. Lewis, D.E. (2003). Presidents and the politics of agency design: Political insulation in the United States government bureaucracy, 1947-1997. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
36. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
37. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
38. Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298-310.
39. Lowi, T. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton.
40. Lynn, L.E. (1981). Managing the public's business. New York: Basic Books.
41. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
42. March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
43. March, J.G., & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
44. Mashaw, J.L., Merrill, R.A., & Shane, P.M. (1998). Administrative law: The American public law system (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
45. Mazmanian, D.A., & Sabatier, P.A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. New York: University Press of America.
46. McCubbins, M.D. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 721-748.
47. McCubbins, M.D., Noll, R.G., & Weingast, B.R. (1989). Structure and process, politics and policy: Administrative arrangements and the political control of agencies. Virginia Law Review, 75, 431-482.
48. Meier, K.J. (1980). Measuring organizational power: Resources and autonomy of government agencies. Administration and Society, 12, 357-375.
49. Meier, K.J. (2000). Politics and the bureaucracy (4th ed.) New York: Harcourt.
50. Meier, K.J., & McFarlane, D.R. (1995). Statutory coherence policy implementation: The case of family planning. Journal of Public Policy, 15, 281-298.
51. Miller, C.C., Glick, W.H., Wang, Y., & Huber, G.P. (1991). Understanding technology-structure relationships: Theory developing and meta-analytic theory testing. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 370-399.
52. Mosher, F.C. (1982). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Moynihan, D.P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
54. Pandey, S.K., & Rainey, H.G. (2006). Public managers' perceptions of organizational goal ambiguity: Analyzing alternative models. International Public Management Journal, 9, 85-112.
55. Pandey, S.K., & Wright, B.E. (2006). Connecting the dots in public management: Political environment, organizational goal ambiguity and the public manager's role ambiguity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 511-532.
56. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
57. Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
58. Poister, T.H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59, 325-335.
59. Radin, B.A. (2000). The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 111-135.
60. Rainey, H.G., & Lee, J.W. (2005, September-October). Of politics and purpose: Political context and goal ambiguity of U.S. federal agencies. Paper presented at the 8th Public Management Research Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
61. Rainey, H.G., Pandey, S., & Bozeman, B. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers' perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55, 567-574.
62. Ringquist, E.J., Worsham, J., & Eisner M.A. (2003). Salience, complexity, and legislative direction of regulatory bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 141-164.
63. Ripley, R.B., & Franklin, G.A. (1991). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
64. Roberts, K.H. (1990). Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organizational Science, 1, 160-176.
65. Salamon, L.M. (2002). Economic regulation. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 117-155). New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Scott, W.R. (1975). Organizational structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 1-20.
67. Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
68. Simon, H.A. (1964). On the concept of organizational goal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 1-22.
69. Stillman, R.J. (1999). Preface to public administration (2nd ed.). Burke, VA: Chatelaine Press.
70. Stillman, R.J. (2004). The American bureaucracy (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
71. Tehrani, M., Montanari, J.R., & Carson, K.R. (1990, August). Technology as determinant of organizational structure: A meta-analytic review. In L. R. Jauch & J. L. Wall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 50th annual meeting of the Academy of Management. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.
72. U.S. General Accounting Office. (2004). Results-oriented government: GPRA has established a solid foundation for achieving greater results. Washington, DC: Author.
73. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2001). OMB circular no. A-11. Washington, DC: Author.
74. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2003). Performance and management assessments. Washington, DC: Author.
75. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (1995). Introduction to the position classification standards. Washington, DC: Author.
76. Van de Ven, A.H., & Ferry, D.L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
77. Volden, C. (2002). Delegating power to bureaucracies: Evidence from the states. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18, 187-220.
78. Warwick, D.P. (1975). A theory of public bureaucracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
79. Weick, K.E., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
80. Weiss, C.H. (1998). Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
81. Weiss, J. (1982). Coping with complexity: An experimental study of public policy decision-making. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2, 66-87.
82. Wildavsky, A. (1979). Speaking truth to power. Boston: Little, Brown.
83. Wilson, J.Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
84. Withey, M., Daft, R.L., & Cooper, W.H. (1983). Measures of Perrow's work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 45-63.
85. Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
86. Wright, B.E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 59-78.
87. Wright, B.E., & Davis, B.S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: The role of work environment. American Review of Public Administration, 33, 79-90.
88. Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2009). How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 335-360.