Innovating knowledge communities: An analysis of group collaboration and competition in science and technology

Scientometrics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 525-554

  Upham, S Phineas ^a   Rosenkopf, Lori ^a   Ungar, Lyle H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic clustering; Innovation; Knowledge communities

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952292850     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0102-2     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 254-285.
2. Aharonson, B., Baum, J., & Feldman, M. (2004). Industrial clustering and the returns to inventive activity: Canadian biotechnology firms, 1991-2000. Draft.
3. Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625-641.
4. Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.
5. Boyack, K. W., & Borner, K. (2003). Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 447-461.
6. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Vanraan, A. F. J. (1991a). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. 1. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.
7. Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Vanraan, A. F. J. (1991b). Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. 2. Dynamic aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 252-266.
8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity-A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
9. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U. S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7552.
10. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11. Crane, D. (1989). How scientists communicate-A citation classic commentary on invisible-colleges-Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities by Crane, D. Current Contents/Arts & Humanities, 22, 14-14.
12. Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual-development of management-information-systems, 1972-1982-A cocitation analysis. Management Science, 32(2), 156-172.
13. Diggle, P., Heagerty, P., Liang, K., & Zeger, S. (2002). Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited-Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
15. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
16. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles (1st ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
17. Drukker, D. M. (2003). Testing for serial correlation in linear panel-data models. Stata Journal, 3(2), 168-177.
18. Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117-132.
19. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2005). Brokerage versus cohesion and collaborative creativity: An evolutionary resolution. Draft.
20. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019-1039.
21. Garfield, E. (1983). How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations, and when is it relevant 2. Current Contents, 45, 5-14.
22. Garfield, E. (1988). Information technology and the social-sciences. Current Contents, 46, 3-9.
23. Gittelman, M. (2003). Does geography matter for science based firms? Epistemic communities and the geography of research and patenting in biotechnology. Draft.
24. Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382.
25. Gugarati, D. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
26. Guimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. (2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(29), 697-702.
27. Hargens, L. L. (2000). Graphing micro-regions in the web of knowledge: A comparative reference network analysis. In Web of knowledge-a Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield (pp. 497-516). Medford: ASIS.
28. Haynes, A., Lackman, C., & Guskey, A. (1999). Comprehensive brand presentation: Ensuring consistent brand image. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 8(4), 28-30.
29. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
30. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.
31. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
32. Kandylas, V., Ungar., L., & Forster, D. (2005). Winner-Take-All EM Clustering. Unpublished.
33. Katila, R. (2002). New product search overtime: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 995-1010.
34. Katila, R. (2003). Innovation product portfolio's by Navigating markets and technology. Draft.
35. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
36. Kogut, B., & Macpherson, J. M. (2004). The decision to privatize as an economic policy idea: Epistemic communities, palace wars, and diffusion. Unpublished.
37. Kripke, S. (1982). Wittgenstein in rules and private language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
39. Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), 307-333.
40. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(Special issue), 41-58.
41. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Makadok, R. (1998). Can first-mover and early-mover advantages be sustained in an industry with low barriers to entry/imitation? Strategic Management Journal, 19(7), 683-696.
43. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
44. McCain, K. W. (1987). Citation patterns in the history of technology. Library & Information Science Research, 9(1), 41-59.
45. McCloskey, D. N. (1998). The rhetoric of economics. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
46. Merton, R. K. (1965). On the shoulders of giants: A Shandean postscript. New York: The Free Press.
47. Merton, R. K. (1972). The sociology of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. Meyer, M., & Zucker, L. G. (1989). Permanently failing organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 653-683.
50. Murray, F. (2005). Exchange relationships & cumulative innovation: Standing on the shoulders of the oncomouse. Unpublished.
51. Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2005). Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge? Paper presented at the NBER Academic Science and Entrepreneurship Conference.
52. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U. S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
53. Nerkar, A. (2003). Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Management Science, 49(2), 211-229.
54. Pakes, A., & Shankerman, M. (1984). The rate of obsolescence of patents, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R & D, patents, and productivity. A National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report (pp. 339-374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science-Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599-620.
56. Phelps, J., & Johnson, E. (1996). Entering the quagmire: Examining the 'meaning' of integrated marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Communications, 2(3), 159-172.
57. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, London: Free Press/Collier Macmillan.
58. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(November-December), 77-90.
59. Porter, M. E., Ketels, C., MIller, K., & Bryden, R. (2004). Competitiveness in Rural U. S. regions: Learning and research agenda. Paper presented at the Economic Development Administration, Washington, D. C.
60. Powell, W. W., Kogut, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145.
61. Price, D. D. (1963). Big science, little science. New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4), 287-306.
63. Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Lauterborn, R. F. (1994). The new marketing paradigm: Integrated marketing. Chicago: NTC Business Books.
64. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development, an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
65. Shane, S. (2002). Selling university technology: Patterns from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 122-137.
66. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(July), 63-74.
67. Small, H., Sweeney, E., & Greenlee, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. I. Comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409.
68. Small, H. G. (1994). A SCI-Map case study: Building a map of AIDS research. Scientometrics, 30, 229-241.
69. Small, H. (2003). Paradigms, citations, and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 394-399.
70. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
71. Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Administrative Science Quarterly, 111(2), 447-504.
72. Watts, D. J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493-527.
73. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
74. White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-434.
75. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Yoels, W. C. (1974). Structure of scientific fields and allocation of editorships on scientific journals-Some observations on politics of knowledge. Sociological Quarterly, 15(2), 264-276.
77. Zhong, S., & Ghosh, J. (2003). A comparative study of generative models for document clustering. In Proceedings of the workshop on clustering high dimensional data. Citeseer.