Croatian scholarly productivity 1991-2005 measured by journals indexed in Web of Science

Scientometrics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 375-395

  Jokić, Maja ^a   Zauder, Krešimir ^a   Letina, Srebrenka ^a  

^a National and University Library   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Croatia; Journal evaluation; Scholarly productivity; Scientific productivity; WoS

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952291834     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0071-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andreis, M., & Jokić, M. (2008). An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975-2001. Scientometrics, 75, 263-288.
2. Archambault, E., Vignola-Gagne, E., Cote, G., et al. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities the limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68, 329-342.
3. Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications-the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32, 143-155.
4. Cullars, J. M. (1998). Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy. Library & Information Science Research, 20, 41-68.
5. Hjorland, B. (2005). Library and information science and philosophy of science. Journal of Documentation, 61, 5-10.
6. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., & Noyons, E. (2001). Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines. Journal of Documentation, 57, 715-740.
7. Jokić, M. (2003). Evaluation of Croatian journals covered by the ISI databases (Institute for Scientific Information). Periodicum biologorum, 105, 95-98.
8. Jokić M. (2006). Scientometrijski pristup znanstvenom radu u polju filozofije. Prolegomena, 5, 99-110. Available at http://hrcak. srce. hr/index. php?show=clanak& id_clanak_jezik=6604.
9. Klaic, Z. B., & Klaic, B. (2004). Croatian scientific publications in top journals according to the Science Citation Index for the 1980-2000 period. Scientometrics, 61, 221-251.
10. Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58, 35-48.
11. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68, 519-533.
12. Moed, H. F. (2005). Differences between science, social science and humanities. In H. F. Moed (Ed.), Citation analysis in research evaluation (pp. 147-153). Berlin: Springer.
13. Moed, H. F., Luwel, M., & Nederhof, A. J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50, 498-520.
14. Nederhof, A. J. (2005). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66, 81-100.
15. Prpić, K. (2007). Changes of scientific knowledge production and research productivity in a transitional society. Scientometrics, 72, 487-511.
16. Szostak, R. (2008). Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study science. Journal of Documentation, 64, 319-329.
17. Vanecek, J. (2008). Bibliometric analysis of the Czech research publications from 1994 to 2005. Scientometrics, 77, 345-360.