The effects of early adversity on the adult and developing brain

Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 233-238

  Tomalski, Przemyslaw ^a   Johnson, Mark H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Functional brain development; Genes environment interaction; Sensitive periods; Social brain; Socioeconomic status

Indexed keywords

THALIDOMIDE;

ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DEPRESSION; DIETARY INTAKE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LIFE STRESS; LIMB MALFORMATION; MENTAL HEALTH; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; POVERTY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PRENATAL EXPOSURE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS;

BRAIN; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION DISORDERS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LIFE CHANGE EVENTS; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL EXPOSURE DELAYED EFFECTS; PSYCHOSOCIAL DEPRIVATION; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 77952240964     PISSN: 09517367     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283387a8c     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Schilling EA, Aseltine RH, Gore S. The impact of cumulative childhood adversity on young adult mental health: measures, models, and interpretations. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1140-1151.
2. Hackman DA, Farah MJ. Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13:65-73. An excellent review of most recent research on low SES effects on the developing brain and specific domains of cognitive processing, discussing important caveats and proposing anew research frameworkand the future of intervention programmes.
3. Rowe ML, Goldin-Meadow S. Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science 2009;323:951-953. Previously, it has been shown that children from low-SES families learn fewer words and have smaller vocabulary, decreasing their chances for high scholastic achievement. This paper demonstrates that these disparities can be explained by early use of gesture at the age of 14 months.
4. Noble KG, Norman MF, Farah MJ. Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Dev Sci 2005;8:74-87.
5. Noble KG, Wolmetz ME, Ochs LG, et al. Brain-behavior relationships in reading acquisition are modulated by socioeconomic factors. Dev Sci 2006;9: 642-654.
6. Raizada RD, Richards TL, Meltzoff A, Kuhl PK. Socioeconomic status predicts hemispheric specialisation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in young children. Neuroimage 2008;40:1392-1401.
7. Kishiyama MM, Boyce WT, Jimenez AM, et al. Socioeconomic disparities affect prefrontal function in children. J Cogn Neurosci 2009;21:1106-1115.
8. Stevens C, Lauinger B, Neville H. Differences in the neural mechanisms of selective attention in children from different socioeconomic backgrounds: an event-related brain potential study. Dev Sci 2009;12:634-646. The authors investigated the ability to suppress responses to irrelevant speech information in children from low-SES backgrounds. Children whose mothers had no college education showed reduced effects of selective attention on early neural processing of speech and reduced ability to filter irrelevant information.
9. D'Angiulli A, Herdman A, Stapells D, Hertzman C. Children's event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status. Neuropsychology 2008;22:293-300.
10. Benton D. Micronutrient status, cognition and behavioural problems in childhood. Eur J Nutr 2008;47:38-50.
11. Luo T, Wagner E, Drager UC. Integrating retinoic acid signaling with brain function. Dev Psychol 2009;45:139-150. A review of recent results on the many roles of retinoic acid signalling pathways in brain development directed at psychology and neuroscience professionals.
12. Bonnet E, Touyarot K, Alfos S, et al. Retinoic acid restores adult hippocampal neurogenesis and reverses spatial memory deficit in vitamin A deprived rats. PLoS One 2008;3:e3487.
13. Liao WL, Tsai HC, Wang HF, et al. Modular patterning of structure and function of the striatum by retinoid receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:6765-6770.
14. Ramakrishnan U, Imhoff-Kunsch B, DiGirolamo AM. Role of docosahexaenoic acid in maternal and child mental health. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:958S-962.
15. DiGirolamo AM, Ramirez-Zea M. Role of zinc in maternal and child mental health. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:940S-945.
16. Beard JL. Why iron deficiency is important in infant development. J Nutr 2008;138: 2534-2536.
17. Kral A. Unimodal and cross-modal plasticity in the 'deaf auditory cortex. Int J Audiol 2007;46:479-493.
18. Lewis TL, Maurer D. Effects of early pattern deprivation on visual development. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:640-646.
19. Maurer D, Mondloch CJ, Lewis TL. Sleeper effects. Dev Sci 2007;10:40-47.
20. Kral A, Eggermont JJ. What's to lose and what's to learn: development under auditory deprivation, cochlear implants and limits of cortical plasticity. Brain Res Rev 2007;56:259-269.
21. Stoeckel MC, Seitz RJ, Buetefisch CM. Congenially altered motor experience alters somatotopic organization of human primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:2395-2400. The paper brings new evidence on the role of early motor experience for the somatotopic organization of primary motor cortex. Individuals with congenitally compromised hand function due to prenatal exposure to thalidomide showed atypical organization of cortical area M1. Compensatory skilful use of the foot led to the motor 'foot' representation recruiting additional cortical areas in the vicinity of the 'hand' area.
22. Derauf C, Kekatpure M, Neyzi N, et al. Neuroimaging of children following prenatal drug exposure. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2009;20:441-454. A complete review of neuroimaging data available to date on brain structural development and functional activations in individuals exposed to toxic substances in utero.
23. Hurt H, Giannetta JM, Korczykowski M, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and working memory in adolescents with gestational cocaine exposure. J Pediatr 2008;152:371-377.
24. Hurt H, Betancourt LM, Malmud EK, et al. Children with and without gestational cocaine exposure: a neurocognitive systems analysis. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2009;31:334-341.
25. Sheinkopf SJ, Lester BM, Sanes JN, et al. Functional MRI and response inhibition in children exposed to cocaine in utero. Preliminary findings. Dev Neurosci 2009;31:159-166. This functional neuroimaging study demonstrates the possible consequences of prenatal cocaine exposure for the development of brain systems involved in the regulation of attention and response inhibition. Cocaine-exposed children showed greater activation in the right inferior frontal cortex and caudate during response inhibition, whereas nonexposed children showed greater activations in temporal and occipital regions.
26. Stiles J, Reilly J, Paul B, Moses P. Cognitive development following early brain injury: evidence for neural adaptation. Trends Cogn Sci 2005;9:136-143.
27. Rowe ML, Levine SC, Fisher JA, Goldin-Meadow S. Does linguistic input play the same role in language learning for children with and without early brain injury? Dev Psychol 2009;45:90-102.
28. Stiles J, Stern C, Appelbaum M, et al. Effects of early focal brain injury on memory for visuospatial patterns: selective deficits of global-local processing. Neuropsychology 2008;22:61-73. This study shows a double dissociation of visual processing impairments (global vs. local processing) in children with right or left hemisphere perinatal lesions.
29. Johnson MH, Grossmann T, Farroni T. The social cognitive neuroscience of infancy: illuminating the early development of social brain functions. Adv Child Dev Behav 2008;36:331-372.
30. Tronick E, Reck C. Infants of depressed mothers. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2009;17: 147-156.
31. Field T, Diego M. Maternal depression effects on infant frontal EEG asymmetry. Int J Neurosci 2008;118:1081-1108.
32. De Bellis M, Hooper SR, Spratt EG, Woolley DP. Neuropsychological findings in childhood neglect and their relationships to pediatric PTSD. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009;15:868-878.
33. Kim J, Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Manly JT. Child maltreatment and trajectories of personality and behavioral functioning: implications for the development of personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol 2009;21:889-912.
34. Zeanah CH, Egger HL, Smyke AT, et al. Institutional rearing and psychiatric disorders in Romanian preschool children. Am J Psychiatry 2009;166:777-785.
35. Bos KJ, Fox N, Zeanah CH, Nelson III CA. Effects of early psychosocial deprivation on the development of memory and executive function. Front Behav Neurosci 2009;3:16.
36. Rutter M, Colvert E, Kreppner J, et al. Early adolescent outcomes for institutionally-deprived and nondeprived adoptees. I. Disinhibited attachment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48:17-30.
37. Rutter M, Kreppner J, Croft C, et al. Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally deprived and nondeprived adoptees. III. Quasi-autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48:1200-1207.
38. Croft C, Beckett C, Rutter M, et al. Early adolescent outcomes of institutionally-deprived and nondeprived adoptees. II: language as a protective factor and a vulnerable outcome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007;48: 31-44.
39. Moulson MC, Westerlund A, Fox NA, et al. The effects of early experience on face recognition: an event-related potential study of institutionalized children in Romania. Child Dev 2009;80:1039-1056.
40. Moulson MC, Fox NA, Zeanah CH, Nelson CA. Early adverse experiences and the neurobiology of facial emotion processing. Dev Psychol 2009;45: 17-30.
41. Marshall PJ, Reeb BC, Fox NA, et al. Effects of early intervention on EEG power and coherence in previously institutionalized children in Romania. Dev Psychopathol 2008;20:861-880. The authors investigated the effects of early intervention on the baseline brain activity of children, who suffered early institutional care and were later internationally adopted or remained in an institution. Differences in EEG power and hemispheric coherence were found between the groups and were associated with the age of placement under foster care.
42. Mehta MA, Golembo NI, Nosarti C, et al. Amygdala, hippocampal and corpus callosum size following severe early institutional deprivation: the English and Romanian Adoptees study pilot. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2009;50:943-951.
43. Tottenham N, Hare TA, Quinn BT, et al. Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Dev Sci 2009;13:46-61. This MRI study demonstrated that prolonged institutionalization has consequences for structural and functional development of emotion processing network in the brain and is modulated by the age of adoption. Late adoption was associated with larger amygdala volume, increased anxiety and poorer emotion regulation.
44. De Bellis MD, Keshavan MS, Shifflett H, et al. Brain structures in pediatric maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a sociodemographically matched study. Biol Psychiatry 2002;52:1066-1078.
45. Woon FL, Hedges DW. Hippocampal and amygdala volumes in children and adults with childhood maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Hippocampus 2008;18:729-736.
46. Choi J, Jeong B, Rohan ML, et al. Preliminary evidence for white matter tract abnormalities in young adults exposed to parental verbal abuse. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65:227-234.
47. Rao H, Betancourt L, Giannetta JM, et al. Early parental care is important for hippocampal maturation: evidence from brain morphology in humans. Neuroimage 2010;49:1144-1150. In this prospective study, the authors investigated the effects of early parental care on brain morphology during adolescence. Parental nurturance at age 4 predicted the volume of hippocampus at 14 years of age, with better nurturance associated with smaller hippocampal volume.
48. Cicchetti D, Curtis WJ. An event-related potential study of the processing of affective facial expressions in young children who experienced maltreatment during the first year of life. Dev Psychopathol 2005;17:641-677.
49. Curtis WJ, Cicchetti D. Emotion and resilience: a multilevel investigation of hemispheric electroencephalogram asymmetry and emotion regulation in maltreated and nonmaltreated children. Dev Psychopathol 2007;19:811-840.
50. Nelson CA 3rd, Zeanah CH, Fox NA, et al. Cognitive recovery in socially deprived young children: the Bucharest Early Intervention Project. Science 2007;318:1937-1940.
51. Berg CA, Sternberg RJ. Response to novelty: continuity versus discontinuity in the developmental course of intelligence. Adv Child Dev Behav 1985;19: 1-47.
52. Sale A, Berardi N, Maffei L Enrich the environment to empower the brain. Trends Neurosci 2009;32:233-239. A recent review of robust literature on the effects of environmental enrichment on animal brain structure and function.
53. Penn PR, Rose FD, Johnson DA. Virtual enriched environments in paediatric neuropsychological rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: feasibility, benefits and challenges. Dev Neurorehabil 2009;12:32-43.
54. Hannigan JH, O'Leary-Moore SK, Berman RF. Postnatal environmental or experiential amelioration of neurobehavioral effects of perinatal alcohol exposure in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31:202-211.
55. Tang AC, Akers KG, Reeb BC, et al. Programming social, cognitive, and neuroendocrine development by early exposure to novelty. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:15716-15721.
56. Akers KG, Yang Z, DelVecchio DP, et al. Social competitiveness and plasticity of neuroendocrine function in old age: influence of neonatal novelty exposure and maternal care reliability. PLoS One 2008;3:e2840.
57. Farah MJ, Betancourt L, Shera DM, et al. Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Dev Sci 2008;11:793-801.
58. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10: 434-445. This paper reviews the literature on the effects of chronic exposure to elevated stress hormones in the lifetime. The authors propose a new model, based on both animal and human studies, taking into account genetic risk factors and early environmental adversity, reviewing the specific effects of stress on the brain, behaviour and cognition.
59. BussC, Lord C, Wadiwalla M, et al. Maternal care modulates the relationship between prenatal risk and hippocampal volume in women but not in men. J Neurosci 2007;27:2592-2595.
60. Korosi A, Baram TZ. The pathways from mother's love to baby's future. Front Behav Neurosci 2009;3:27. The authors discuss recent developments in the research on the impact of early-life experience on the expression and function of stress-related genes throughout life. Of special interest is the role of maternal care in the development of resilient or vulnerable phenotypes.
61. Casey BJ, GlattCE, Tottenham N, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a model system for examining gene by environment interactions across development. Neuroscience 2009;164:108-120.
62. Holmboe K, Nemoda Z, Fearon RMP, et al. Polymorphisms in dopamine system genes are associated with individual differences in attention in infancy. Dev Psychol (in press).
63. Stevens SE, Kumsta R, Kreppner JM, et al. Dopamine transporter gene polymorphism moderates the effects of severe deprivation on ADHD symptoms: developmental continuities in gene-environment interplay. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2009;150B:753-761. This paper demonstrates that the high risk of developing ADHD by children who experienced early institutional care is moderated by specific variants of the DAT1 genotype. Thus, the authors provide evidence for the interactions between genetic and environmental factors in emerging attention deficits.
64. Gervai J, Novak A, Lakatos K, et al. Infant genotype may moderate sensitivity to maternal affective communications: attachment disorganization, quality of care, and the DRD4 polymorphism. Soc Neurosci 2007;2:307-319.
65. Wiebe SA, Espy KA, Stopp C, et al. Gene-environment interactions across development: exploring DRD2 genotype and prenatal smoking effects on selfregulation. Dev Psychol 2009;45:31-44. This study explored the interaction between the DRD2 genotype and prenatal tobacco exposure (PTE) in neonates and preschoolers. Children who had the higher risk genotype and whose mothers reported smoking during pregnancy had increased difficulties across all task conditions.
66. Buckholtz JW, Meyer-Lindenberg A. MAOA and the neurogenetic architecture of human aggression. Trends Neurosci 2008;31:120-129.
67. Skuse DH, Gallagher L Dopaminergic-neuropeptide interactions in the social brain. Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13:27-35.
68. Young KA, Liu Y, Wang ZX. The neurobiology of social attachment: a comparative approach to behavioral, neuroanatomical, and neurochemical studies. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 2008;148:401-410.
69. Bora E, Yucel M, Allen NB. Neurobiology of human affiliative behaviour: implications for psychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2009;22:320-325.
70. LaviolaG, Ognibene E, Romano E, et al. Gene-environment interaction during early development in the heterozygous reeler mouse: clues for modelling of major neurobehavioral syndromes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009;33:560-572.
71. Kinney DK, Hintz K, Shearer EM, et al. A unifying hypothesis of schizophrenia: abnormal immune system development may help explain roles of prenatal hazards, postpubertal onset, stress, genes, climate, infections, and brain dysfunction. Med Hypotheses 2010;74:555-563.
72. BeauchaineTP, Klein DN, Crowell SE, et al. Multifinality in the development of personality disorders: a biology × Sex × Environment interaction model of antisocial and borderline traits. Dev Psychopathol 2009;21:735-770.
73. Thomas MSC, Johnson MH. New advances in understanding sensitive periods in brain development. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008;17:1-5. The authors review recent findings on sensitive periods in brain development, discussing multiple processes of cognitive development and underlying neural mechanisms. They emphasize that sensitive periods may be a consequence of the basic processes underlying postnatal functional brain development.
74. Sweatt JD. Experience-dependent epigenetic modifications in the central nervous system. Biol Psychiatry 2009;65:191-197. The author proposes that sensitive periods in brain development can be characterized by underlying genetic and epigenetic molecular mechanisms of nervous system maturation. In particular, several epigenetic mechanisms of gene expression act in an experience-dependent manner, thus allowing for specific types of early experience to control the closure of developmental sensitive periods.
75. Marshall PJ, Kenney JW. Biological perspectives on the effects of early psychosocial experience. Dev Rev 2009;29:96-119.
76. Doyle O, Harmon CP, Heckman JJ, Tremblay RE. Investing in early human development: timing and economic efficiency. Econ Hum Biol 2009;7:1-6.