Sleeper effects

Developmental Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 40-47

  Maurer, Daphne ^a,b   Mondloch, Catherine J ^c   Lewis, Terri L ^a,b,d  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^c BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; CATARACT; CHILD; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FACE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISION;

BRAIN; CATARACT; CHILD; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FACE; HUMANS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845722685     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00562.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Atkinson, J., Braddick, O., & Moar, K. (1977). Contrast sensitivity of the human infant for moving and static patterns. Vision Research, 17, 1045-1047.
2. Banks, M.S., & Salapatek, P. (1978). Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 17, 361-365.
3. Bertin, E., & Bhatt, R.S. (2004). The Thatcher illusion and face processing in infancy. Developmental Science, 7, 431-436.
4. Bhatt, R.S., Bertin, E., Hayden, A., & Reed, A. (2005). Face processing in infancy: developmental changes in the use of different kinds of relational information. Child Development, 76, 169-181.
5. Brown, A., & Yamamoto, M. (1986). Visual acuity in newborn and preterm infants measured with grating acuity cards. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 102, 245-253.
6. Carey, S., & Diamond, R. (1994). Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children? Visual Cognition, 1, 253-274.
7. Cashon, C.H., & Cohen, L.B. (2003). The construction, deconstruction, and reconstruction of infant face perception. In O. Pascalis & A. Slater (Eds.), The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: Current perspectives (pp. 55-68). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
8. Cashon, C.H., & Cohen, L.B. (2004). Beyond U-shaped development in infants' processing of faces: an information-processing account. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 59-80.
9. Collishaw, S.M., & Hole, G.J. (2000). Featural and configural processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception, 29, 893-909.
10. Courage, M., & Adams, R. (1990). Visual acuity assessment from birth to three years using the acuity card procedure: cross-sectional and longitudinal samples. Optometry and Vision Science, 67, 713-718.
11. Crawford, M.L.J., Pesch, T.W., von Noorden, G.K., Harwerth, R.S., & Smith, E.L. (1991). Bilateral form deprivation in monkeys: electrophysiologic and anatomic consequences. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 32, 2328-2336.
12. de Schonen, S., & Mathivet, E. (1989). First come, first served: a scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 3-44.
13. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
14. Ellemberg, D., Lewis, T.L., Liu, C.H., & Maurer, D. (1999a). The development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood. Vision Research, 39, 2325-2333.
15. Ellemberg, D., Lewis, T.L., Maurer, D., Liu, C.H., & Brent, H.P. (1999b). Spatial and temporal vision in patients treated for bilateral congenital cataracts. Vision Research, 39, 3480-3489.
16. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L.A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception, 29, 159-170.
17. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 431-446.
18. Goffaux, V., Hault, B., Michel, C., Vuong, Q.C., & Rossion, B. (2005). The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces. Perception, 34, 77-86.
19. Gwiazda, J., Bauer, J., Thorn, F., & Held, R. (1997). Development of spatial contrast sensitivity from infancy to adulthood: psychophysical data. Optometry and Vision Science, 74, 785-789.
20. Hole, G. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
21. Le Grand, R., Maurer, D., & Mondloch, C. (May 2004). Infants' sensitivity to featural and configural changes in human faces. Poster presented at the meeting of the International Society on Infant Studies, Chicago.
22. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H.P. (2001). Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410, 890. Correction: 2001, 412, 786.
23. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. (2003). Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1108-1112. Erratum: 2003, 8, 1329.
24. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762-768.
25. Lewis, T.L., Maurer, D., & Brent, H.P. (1995). The development of grating acuity in children treated for unilateral or bilateral congenital cataract. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 36, 2080-2095.
26. Lickliter, R. (2000). Atypical perinatal sensory stimulation and early perceptual development: insights from developmental psychobiology. Journal of Perinatology, 20, S45-S54.
27. Maurer, D., Ellemberg, D., & Lewis, T.L. (2006). Repeated measures of contrast sensitivity reveal limits to visual plasticity after early binocular deprivation in humans. Neuropsychologica, 44, 2104-2112.
28. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
29. Maurer, D., & Lewis, T. (2001a). Visual acuity and spatial contrast sensitivity: normal development and underlying mechanisms. In C. Nelson & M. Luciana (Eds.), Handbook of developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 237-250). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Maurer, D., & Lewis, T.L. (2001b). Visual acuity: the role of visual input in inducing postnatal change. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 1, 239-247.
31. Maurer, D., Lewis, T.L., Brent, H.P., & Levin, A.V. (1999). Rapid improvement in the acuity of infants after visual input. Science, 286, 108-110.
32. Maurer, D., Lewis, T.L., & Mondloch, C. (2005). Missing sights: consequences for visual cognitive development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 144-151.
33. Mayer, D.L., & Dobson, V. (1982). Visual acuity development in infants and young children as assessed by operant preferential looking. Vision Research, 22, 1141-1151.
34. Michel, C., Caldara, R., & Rossion, B. (in press). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition.
35. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C.-S., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of our own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
36. Mondloch, C., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
37. Mondloch, C., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2003). Early visual experience is necessary for the development of some - but not all - aspects of face processing. In O. Pascalis & A. Slater (Eds.), The development of face processing in infancy and early childhood: Current perspectives (pp. 99-117). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
38. Mondloch, C.J., Leis, A., & Maurer, D. (2006). Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and me: insensitivity to the spacing among features at four years of age. Child Development, 77, 234-243.
39. Mondloch, C., Maurer, D., & Ahola, S. (in press). Becoming a face expert. Psychological Science.
40. Mondloch, C., Pathman, T., Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & de Schonen, S. (in press). The composite face effect in six-year-old children: evidence of adultlike holistic face processing. Visual Cognition.
41. Pellicano, E., & Rhodes, G. (2003). Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 14, 618-622.
42. Rhodes, G., Hayward, W., & Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 499-505.
43. Tanaka, J.W., & Farah, M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Experimental Psychology, 46, 225-245.
44. Tanaka, J.W., Kiefer, M., & Bukach, C.M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93, B1-B9.
45. Thomas, M.S., & Johnson, M.H. (2006). The computational modeling of sensitive periods. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 337-344.
46. Van Hof-van Duin, J., & Mohn, G. (1986). The development of visual acuity in normal fullterm and preterm infants. Vision Research, 26, 909-916.
47. Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D.C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.