Early training in oral comprehension and phonological skills: Results of a three-year longitudinal study

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 211-246

  Bianco, Maryse ^a   Bressoux, Pascal ^a   Doyen, Anne Lise ^b   Lambert, Eric ^c   Lima, Laurent ^a   Pellenq, Catherine ^a   Zorman, Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

^c Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952134038     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888430903117518     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Baker, L. (1985). How do we know we don't understand? Standards for evaluating text comprehension. In D. L. Forrest, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 155-205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2. Baker, L., & Zimlin, L. (1989). Instructional effects on children's use of two levels of standards for evaluating their comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 340-346.
3. Baumann, J. F. (1986). Teaching third-grade students to comprehend anaphoric relationships: The application of a direct instruction model. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 70-90.
4. Baumann, J. F., Carr Edwards, E., Font, G., Tereshinski, C. A., Kame'enui, E. J., & Olejnik, S. (2002). Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 150-176.
5. Bianco, M., Coda, M.,&Gourgue, D. (2002). Compréhension, Grande section. Grenoble, France: Editions de la Cigale.
6. Bianco, M., Coda, M., & Gourgue, D. (2006). Compréhension, Moyenne section. Grenoble, France: Editions de la Cigale.
7. Bianco, M., Lima, L., & Sylvestre, E. (2004). Comment enseigner les stratégies de compréhension. In E. Gentaz & P. Dessus (Eds.), Comprendre les apprentissages et enseigner: Apports des sciences cognitives (pp 48-68). Paris, France: Dunod.
8. Bianco, M., Pellenq, C., & Coda, M. (2004). Enseigner des stratégies pour comprendre en moyenne section de maternelle. Le langage et l'homme, 39(2), 69-86.
9. Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. L., Miles, J., et al. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. The Journal Of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422-432.
10. Bus, A. G., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403-414.
11. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1998).Comprehension skill and inference-making ability: Issues of causality. In C. Hulme & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 329-342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 671-681.
13. Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1986). Cognitive processes in reading. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practise (pp. 11-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Casalis, S., & Louis-Alexandre, M. F. (2000). Morphological Analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 12, 303-335.
15. Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91, 77-111.
16. Chardon, S.C. (2000). Expérience de soutien en lecture auprès de faibles lecteurs de cycle 3 [The effects of a word identification supporting training with grade 5 low achieving readers]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 130, 107-120.
17. Crain-Thoreson, C., & Dale, P. S. (1999). Enhancing linguistic performance: Parents and teachers as book reading partners for children with language delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 28-39.
18. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the developement of reading, Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 51-77.
19. Deltour, J. J., & Hupkens, D. (1980). Test de Vocabulaire Actif et Passif (T.V.A.P.). Braîne le Château, Belgique: Editions Applications des Techniques Modernes.
20. Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 482-494.
21. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447.
22. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoud-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250-287.
23. Elbro, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (2003). Early identification. In T. Nunes, & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 361-381). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
24. Gaonac'h, D., & Fayol, M. (2003). Aider les élèves à comprendre: Du texte a multimédia [How to help children comprehend: From text to multimedia]. Paris: Hachette.
25. Garton, A. F., & Pratt, C. (2004). Reading stories. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 213-228). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
26. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as a structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R.,&Faust, M. E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 430-445.
28. Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J., Plewis, I., Drayer, D., Browne, W., Yang, M., et al. (1998). A user's guide to MLWIN (Multilevel models project). London, UK: Institute of Education.
29. Gombert, J. E. (1990). Le développement métalinguistique [Metalinguistic development]. Paris, France: PUF.
30. Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. London, UK: Erlbaum.
31. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
32. Hatcher, P. J., Goetz, K., Snowling, M., Hulme, C., Gibbs, S., & Smith, G. (2006). Evidence for the effectiveness of the early literacy support programme, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 351-367.
33. Hatcher, P. J., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2004). Explicit phoneme training combined with phonic reading instruction helps young children at risk of reading failure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 228-258.
34. Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
35. Insee (Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques). (2007). Tableaux de l'économie française [Views of the French economy]. Retrieved from http://www.insee.fr
36. Kinnunen, R, Vauras, M., & Niemi, P. (1998). Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 353-375.
37. Lambert, E., & Doyen, A. L. (2005). Phonoludos entrainement MS & GS [Phonoludos, training for prekindergartners and kindergartners]. Grenoble, France: La Cigale Editions.
38. Lecocq, P. (1992). La lecture, processus, apprentissage, troubles [Reading, processes, learning, and disorders]. Lille, France: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
39. Lecocq, P. (1996). Ecosse: Une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique [Ecosse: A syntacticosemantic test]. Lille, France: Presses Universitaires de Lille.
40. Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways to literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653-682.
41. McDonald Connor, C., Morrison, F. J., & Slominski, L. (2006). Preschool instruction and children's emergent literacy growth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 665-689.
42. McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 15, 3-18.
43. Morrow, L. M. (1985). Retelling stories: A strategy for improving young children's comprehension, concept of story structure and oral language complexity. Elementary School Journal, 85, 647-661.
44. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665-681.
45. Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147.
46. Nation, K., & Snowling, M.J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101.
47. NICHD, Early Child Care Research Network. (2005). Pathways to reading: The role of oral language in the transition to reading. Developmental Psychology, 41, 428-442.
48. Oakhill, J. (1994). Individual differences in children's text comprehension. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 821-848). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49. Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2003).The development of comprehension skills. In T. Nunes&P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 155-180). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
50. Oakhill, J., Cain K., & Yuill J. (1998). Individual differences in comprehension. In C. Hulme & R. Malatesha Joshi (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 329-342). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
53. Robbins, C., & Ehri, L.C. (1994). Reading storybooks to kindergartners helps them learn new vocabulary words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 54-64.
54. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
55. Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 142-164.
56. Sénéchal, M., & LeFèvre J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children's reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73, 445-460.
57. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58. Spires, H. A., & Donley, J. (1998). Prior knowledge activation: Inducing engagement with informational texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 249-260.
59. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Bechennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading and in spelling. A four year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194-217.
60. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., Cunningham, A. E., Cipielewski, J., & Siddiqui, S. (1996). The role of inadequate print exposure as a determinant of reading comprehension problems. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 15-32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
62. Storch, S. A., & Whitehurst, G. J. (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 934-947.
63. Thiede, K. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2003). Summarizing can improve metacomprehension accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 129-160.
64. Torgesen, J. K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 7-20.
65. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in children with phonological processing difficulties: Group and individual responses to instruction? Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 579-593.
66. Trabasso, T., & Bouchard, E. (2002). Teaching readers how to comprehend strategically. In C. Collins Block&M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction, research-based best practices (pp. 176-202). New York, NY: Guilford.
67. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-288.
68. Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539-588). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
69. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
70. Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
71. Whitehurst, G. J., Arnold, D. S., Epstein, J. N., Angell, A. L., Smith, M., & Fischel, J. E. (1994). A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology, 30, 679-689.
72. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848-872.
73. Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219-249.
74. Yuill, N., & Oakhill, J. (1991). Children's problems in text comprehension: An experimental investigation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.