Systematic review of the impact of adult drug-treatment courts

Translational Research

Volumn 155, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 263-274

  Brown, Randall T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLISM; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COCAINE DEPENDENCE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COURT; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OFFENDER; OPIATE ADDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUASI EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; REVIEW; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77952103361     PISSN: 19315244     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2010.03.001     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Huddleston III C.W., Marlowe D., and Casebolt R. Painting the current picture: a national report card on drug courts and other problem-solving court programs in the United States (2008), National Drug Court Institute, Alexandria, Va
2. Beatty P., Petteruti A., and Ziedenberg J. The vortex: the concentrated racial impact of drug imprisonment and the characteristics of punitive counties (2007), Justice Policy Institute, Washington, DC
3. Bhati A.S., Roman J., Chalfin A., Center J.P., and Urban I. To treat or not to treat: evidence on the prospects of expanding treatment to drug-involved offenders (2008), Urban Institute, Washington, DC
4. King R., and Mauer M. Distorted priorties: drug offenders in state prison (2002), The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC
5. ONDCP. Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse. Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project (2003), Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC
6. Saxe L., Kadushin C., Beveridge A., et al. The visibility of illicit drugs: implications for community-based drug control strategies. Am J Publ Health 91 (2001) 1987-1994
7. SAMHSA. Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies) (2007), Office of Applied Studies, Rockville, Md
8. Mayrack B.R. Race & sentencing in Wisconsin: sentence and offender characteristics across five criminal offense areas (2007), Wisconsin Sentencing Commission, Madison, Wis
9. Harer M.D. United States Bureau of P. Recidivism among federal prison releases in 1987: a preliminary report (1994), Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Research and Evaluation, Washington, DC
10. Finn P., and Newlyn A.K. National Institute of Justice. Miami's "Drug Court": a different approach (1993), U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
11. Office of National Drug Control P. Enforcement: Drug Courts. http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/enforce/drugcourt.html. Accessed December 18, 2007.
12. Hubbard R.L., Craddock S.G., Flynn P.M., Anderson J., and Etheridge R.M. Overview of 1-year follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 11 (1997) 261
13. Simpson D.D., and Sells S.B. Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: an overview of the DARP research program. Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse 2 (1982) 7-29
14. Simpson D.D., Joe G.W., Broome K.M., Hiller M.L., Knight K., and Rowan-Szal G.A. Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychol Addict Behav 11 (1997) 279-293
15. Simpson D.D., Joe G.W., Rowan-Szal G.A., and Greener J.M. Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. J Subst Abuse Treat 14 (1997) 565-572
16. Ritter A., Bowden S., Murray T., Ross P., Greeley J., and Pead J. The influence of the therapeutic relationship in treatment for alcohol dependency. Drug Alcohol Rev 21 (2002) 261-268
17. Peters R.H., Haas A.L., and Hunt W.M. Treatment "dosage" effects in drug court programs. J Offender Rehabil 33 (2001) 63
18. Marlowe D.B., DeMatteo D.S., and Festinger D.S. A sober assessment of drug courts. Federal Sentencing Reporter 16 (2003) 153-157
19. Barton G. Wicomico County adult drug treatment court (circuit court) process evaluation (2008), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
20. Marchand G., Waller M., and Carey S.M. Barry County adult drug court outcome and cost evaluation (2006), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
21. Barton G. Baltimore city drug treatment court: process evaluation (2007), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
22. Porter R. Supervised treatment in the criminal court: a process evaluation of the Manhattan Misdemeanor Drug Court (2002), Vera Institute of Justice, New York
23. Gottfredson D., Najaka S.S., and Kearley B. Effectiveness of drug courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminol Publ Pol 2 (2003) 171-194
24. Gottfredson D.C., and Exum M.L. The Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: one-year results from a randomized study. J Res Crime Delinquen 39 (2002) 337-356
25. Gottfredson D.C., Najaka S.S., and Kearley B.W. Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: results from an experimental study. J Exp Criminol 2 (2006) 67-98
26. Texas Council CJP. Initial process and outcome evaluation of drug courts in Texas (2003), Criminal Justice Policy Council, Washington, DC
27. Marchand G., Waller M., and Carey S.M. Kalamazoo County adult drug treatment court: outcome and cost evaluation (2006), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
28. Listwan S.J., Sundt J.L., Holsinger A.M., and Latessa E.J. The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: the Cincinnati Experience. Crime Delinquen 49 (2003) 389-411
29. Spohn C., Piper R.K., Martin T., and Frenzel E.D. Drug courts and recidivism: the results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. J Drug Issues 31 (2001) 149-176
30. Brewster M.P. An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program. J Drug Issues 31 (2001) 177-206
31. Carey S.M., Crumpton D., Finigan M., and Waller M. California Drug Courts: a methodology for determining costs and benefits (2005), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
32. Cooper C.S. Drug Court Survey Report: Executive Summary (1997), Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, Washington, DC
33. Gray A.R., and Saum C.A. Mental health, gender, and drug court completion. Am J Crim Justice 30 (2005) 55-69
34. Hagedorn H., and Willenbring M.L. Psychiatric illness among drug court probationers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 29 (2003) 775-788
35. Weitzel J.A., Nochajski T.H., Coffey S.F., and Farrell M.G. Mental health among suburban drug court participants. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 33 (2007) 475-481
36. Webster J.M., Rosen P.J., Krietemeyer J., Mateyoke-Scrivner A., Staton-Tindall M., and Leukefeld C. Gender, mental health, and treatment motivation in a drug court setting. J Psychoactive Drugs 38 (2006) 441-448
37. Washousky R., and Ferrer J. Buffalo drug treatment court: process evaluation (2001), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
38. Carey S., and Marchand G. Marion County adult drug court outcome evaluation. Report (2005), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
39. Fielding J.E., Tye G., and Ogawa P.L. Los Angeles County drug court programs: initial results. J Subst Abuse Treat 23 (2002) 217-224
40. Granfield R., Eby C., and Brewster T. An examination of the Denver Drug Court: the impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law Pol 20 (1998) 183-202
41. Rempel M., and Destefano C.D. Predictors of engagement in court-mandated treatment: findings at the Brooklyn Treatment Court, 1996-2000. J Offender Rehabil 33 (2001) 87-124
42. Peters R.H., and Murrin M.R. Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Crim Justice Behav 27 (2000) 72-96
43. Harrell A., Cavanaugh S., and Roman J. Evaluation of the DC Superior Court drug intervention programs (2000), U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC
44. Stageberg P., Wilson B., and Moore R. Final report on the Polk County Adult Drug Court: executive summary and summary of findings (2001), Iowa Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Des Moines
45. Deschenes E.P., Turner S., and Greenwood P.W. Drug Court or probation?: An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's Drug Court. Justice Syst J 18 (1995) 55-73
46. Carey S., and Marchand G. Malheur County Adult Drug Court (S.A.F.E. Court) Outcome Evaluation (2005), NPC Research, Portland, Ore
47. Lindquist C.H., Krebs C.P., and Lattimore P.K. Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. J Drug Issues 36 (2006) 119-146
48. Wolfe E., and Termondt J. A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a 2-year follow-up period. J Drug Issues 32 (2002) 1155-1171
49. Wilson D.B., Mitchell O., and MacKenzie D.L. A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. J Exp Criminol 2 (2006) 459-487
50. Banks D., and Gottfredson D.C. The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. J Drug Issues 33 (2003) 385-412
51. Banks D., and Gottfredson D.C. Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Q 21 (2004) 637-658
52. Smith B.E., Lurigio A.J., David R.C., and Elstein S.G. Burning the midnight oil: an Examination of Cook County's Night Drug Court. Justice Syst J 17 (1994) 41
53. Miethe T.D., Lu H., and Reese E. Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime Delinquen 46 (2000) 522-541
54. Goldkamp J.S., White M.D., and Robinson J.B. Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. J Drug Issues 31 (2001) 27
55. Dannerbeck A., Harris G., Sundet P., and Lloyd K. Understanding and responding to racial differences in drug court outcomes. J Ethn Subst Abuse 5 (2006) 1-22
56. Sechrest D.K., Shichor D., and Artist K. The Riverside County drug court: final research report (1998), Criminal Justice Department, California State University, San Bernardino
57. Schiff M., and Terry C. Predicting graduation from Broward County's dedicated drug treatment court. Justice Syst J 19 (1997) 291-310
58. Saum C.A., Scarpitti F.R., and Robbins C.A. Violent offenders in drug court. J Drug Issues 31 (2001) 107-128
59. Vito G.F., and Tewksbury R.A. The impact of treatment: The Jefferson county (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation 62 (1998) 46-51
60. Gottfredson D.C., Kearley B.W., Najaka S.S., and Rocha C.M. How drug treatment courts work: an analysis of mediators. J Res Crime Delinquen 44 (2007) 3-35
61. Roman J., Townsend W., and Bhati A.S. Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: nationally based estimates (2002), The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
62. Joe G.W., Simpson D.D., Dansereau D.F., and Rowan-Szal G.A. Relationships between counseling rapport and drug abuse treatment outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 52 (2001) 1223-1229
63. McLellan A.T., Kushner H., Metzger D., et al. The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J Subst Abuse Treat 9 (1992) 199-213
64. Carey S.M., and Finigan M.W. A detailed cost analysis in a mature drug court setting: a cost-benefit evaluation of the Multnomah County Drug Court. J Contemp Crim Justice 20 (2004) 315
65. Petersilia J. Probation in the United States. Crime Justice (1997) 149-200
66. Petersilia J., Turner S., Deschenes E.P., Byrne J.M., and Lurigio A.J. Intensive supervision programs for drug offenders. In: Byrne J.M., Lurigio A.J., and Petersilia J. (Eds). Smart sentencing: the emergence of intermediate sanctions (1992), Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif 18-37
67. Roman J., Brooks L., Lagerson E., Chalfin A., Tereshchenko B., and Center J.P. Impact and cost-benefit analysis of the Maryland Reentry Partnership Initiative (2007), Urban Institute, Washington, DC
68. Zarkin G.A., Dunlap L.J., Belenko S., and Dynia P.A. A benefit-cost analysis of the Kings County District Attorney's Office Drug Treatment Alternative to Prison (DTAP) Program. Justice Res Pol 7 (2005) 1-26
69. Alemi F., Taxman F., Baghi H., Vang J., Thanner M., and Doyon V. Costs and benefits of combining probation and substance abuse treatment. J Ment Health Pol Econ 9 (2006) 57
70. Barton G. Harford County District Court Adult Drug Court Outcome and Cost Evaluation (2008), NPC Research, Portland, OR
71. Fabelo T. Three year recidivism tracking of offenders participating in substance abuse treatment programs (2009), Criminal Justice Policy Council, Austin, TX