Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: Implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making

Journal of Drug Issues

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 119-146

  Lindquist, Christine H ^a   Krebs, Christopher P ^a   Lattimore, Pamela K ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; DRUG COURT PROGRAM; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645825640     PISSN: 00220426     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002204260603600106     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. (Eds.) 1978 Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003a Probation and parole in the United States, 2002. NCJ 201135.
3. Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003b Prisoners in 2002. NCJ 200248.
4. Burns, S., & Peyrot, M. 2003 Tough love: Nuturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems, 50(3), 416-438.
5. California Association of Drug Court Professionals 1997 Survey of current drug court programs in California. San Francisco, CA: California Association of Drug Court Professionals.
6. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 1997 Planning chart: Treatment-based drug courts. Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
7. Cooper, C.S. 1995 Drug courts: A profile of operational programs. Paper presented at the State Justice Institute National Symposium on the Implementation and Operation of Drug Courts, Portland, OR.
8. Cresswell, L.S., & Deschenes, E.P. 2001 Minority and nonminority perceptions of drug court program severity and effectiveness. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 259-292.
9. Drug Courts Program Office 1997 Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
10. General Accounting Office 2005 Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO-05-219.
11. Goldkamp, J.S. 1994 Justice and treatment innovation: The drug court movement. Washington DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.
12. Harrell, A., & Roman, J. 2001 Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 207-232.
13. Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morrall, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., Deschenes, E., & Iguchi, M. 2001 Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 7-26.
14. Marlowe, D.B., & Kirby, K.C. 1999 Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: Lessons from behavioral research National Drug Court Institute Review, II, 1-15.
15. Nagin, D.S. 1998 Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of the research: Vol. 23 (pp. 1-42). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Sherin, K.M., & Mahoney, B. 1996 Treatment drug courts: Integrating substance abuse treatment with legal case processing (Treatment Improvement Protocol [TIP] Series 23). Washington, DC: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services.
17. Tauber, J.S. 1994 Drug Courts: A judicial manual. California Center for Judicial Education and Research Journal. Summer.
18. Terry, W.C. 1999 The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
19. Williams, K., & Hawkins, R. 1986 Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law and Society Review, 20, 545-572.