Genetic testing and risk interpretation: How do women understand lifetime risk results?

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 116-123

  Hanoch, Yaniv ^a   Miron Shatz, Talya ^b,c   Himmelstein, Mary ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ONO ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Genetic counseling; Lifetime risk; Numeracy; Risk perception

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951952098     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ancker, J. S., & Kaufman, D. (2007). Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14,713-721.
2. Armstrong, K., Eisen, A., & Weber, B. (2000). Assessing the risk of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 564-471.
3. Brewer, N. T., Tzeng, J. P., Lillie, S. E., Edwards, A. S., Peppercorn, J. M., & Rimer, B. K. (2009). Health literacy and cancer risk perception: Implications for genomic risk communication. Medical Decision Making, 9,57-66.
4. Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A. & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: A systematic review. Medical Journal of Australia, 178, 77-81.
5. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2005). How making risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 57, 294-299.
6. Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Ubel, P. A., Jankovic, Al., Derry, H. A., & Smith, D. M. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 27, 672-680.
7. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2008). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53-96
8. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). A 30% chance of rain tomorrow: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25, 623-629
9. Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., & Armstrong, K. (2004). The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Medical Decision Making, 24, 265-271
10. Hallowell, N., Statham, H., & Murton, F. (1998). Women's understanding of their risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer before and after genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 7, 345-364.
11. Harmon, A. (2007, Sept 16). Cancer free at 33, but weighing a mastectomy. New York Times. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/16/health/16gene.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=cancer+free+at+33&st=nyt3
12. Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 10, 19-32.
13. Hopwood, P., Howell, A., Lalloo, F., & Evans, G. (2003). Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with family history of breast cancer. Community Genetics, 6, 214-223
14. Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications (pp. 48-81). New York: Cambridge University Press
15. Katapodi, M. C., Lee, K. A., Faciona, N. C., & Dodd, M. J. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine, 38, 388-402.
16. Lipkus, I. M., Biradavolu, M., Fenn, K., Keller, P., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). Informing women about their breast cancer risks: Truth and consequences. Health Communication, 13, 205-229.
17. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001) General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37-44.
18. Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M., et al. (2003). Women's preference and consultants' communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: Impact and patient outcome. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40,1-8
19. Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Larson, M. G., Beiser, A. & Levy, D. (1999). Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet, 353, 89-92.
20. MacDonald, D. J., Choi, J., Sand, S., McCaffrey, S., Blazer, K. R., Grant, M., et al. (2002). Concerns of women presenting to a comprehensive cancer centre for genetic cancer risk assessment. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39, 526-530.
21. Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counseling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1462-1470.
22. Murphy, A. H., Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Winkler, R. L. (1980). Misinterpretation of precipitation probability forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 61, 695-701.
23. National Cancer Institute. (2002, February). National cancer institute fact sheet, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: It's your choice. Retrieved April 10, 2009, from the National Cancer Institute Web Site: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/risk/brca
24. Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I., & Peters, E. (2008). Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice. Annals of behavioral medicine, 35,261-274.
25. Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407-413.
26. Reyna, V. F. (2001). Genetic testing and medical decision making. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161, 24062408.
27. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2007). The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 147159.
28. Sivell, S., Elwyn, E., Gaff, C. L., Clarke, A. J., Iredale, R., Shaw, C., Dundon, J., Thornton, H., & Edwards, A. (2008). How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: Systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 30-63.
29. Slaytor, E. K., & Ward, J. E. (1998). How risk of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: Analysis of 58 pamphlets. British Medical Journal, 317, 263-264.
30. Vernon, S. W. (1999). Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: A review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 101-119.
31. Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. (1999). Women's perception of breast cancer risk: How you ask matters. Medical Decision Making, 19, 221-229.
32. Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Smith, D. M., Ubel, P.A., & Fagerlin, A. (2007). Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making, 27: 663-671.