Determination of the in vivo structural DNA loop organization in the genomic region of the rat albumin locus by means of a topological approach

DNA Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-35

  Rivera Mulia, Juan Carlos ^a,b   Aranda Anzaldo, Armando ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b INSTITUTO DE FISIOLOGÍA CELULAR   (Mexico)

Author keywords

DNA topology; loop attachment regions; matrix attachment regions; nuclear matrix; nucleotype

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; ALBUMINOID; DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA STRUCTURE; GENE LOCUS; GENOME; IN VIVO STUDY; LIVER CELL; MALE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FAMILY; RAT; ANIMAL; BASE PAIRING; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CHROMOSOME MAP; CONFORMATION; GENETICS; KINETICS; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; WISTAR RAT;

METAZOA; RATTUS;

ALBUMINS; ANIMALS; BASE PAIRING; BASE SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA; GENETIC LOCI; GENOME; KINETICS; MALE; MATRIX ATTACHMENT REGIONS; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; PHYSICAL CHROMOSOME MAPPING; RATS; RATS, WISTAR;

EID: 77951929935     PISSN: 13402838     EISSN: 17561663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsp027     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Nickerson, J.A. 2001, Experimental observations of a nuclear matrix, J. Cell Sci., 114, 463-474
2. Tsutsui, K.M., Sano, K. and Tsutsui, K. 2005, Dynamic view of the nuclear matrix, Acta Med. Okayama, 59, 113-120
3. Mika, S. and Rost, B. 2005, NMPdb: database of nuclear matrix proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D160-3.
4. Ottaviani, D., Lever, E., Takousis, P. and Sheer, D. 2008, Anchoring the genome, Genome Biol., 9, 2011.
5. Razin, S.V. 2001, The nuclear matrix and chromosomal DNA loops: is there any correlation between partitioning of the genome into loops and functional domains?, Cell Mol. Biol. Lett., 6, 59-69.
6. Maya-Mendoza, A., Hernández-Muñoz, R., Gariglio, P. and Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2003, Gene positional changes relative to the nuclear substructure correlate with the proliferating status of hepatocytes during liver regeneration, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 6168-6179
7. Heng, H.H.Q., Goetze, S., Ye, J.C., et al. 2004, Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions, J. Cell Sci., 117, 999-1008.
8. Petrova, N.V., Iarovaia, O.V., Verbovoy, V.A. and Razin, S.V. 2005, Specific radial positions of human chromosomes X, 1 and 19 remain unchanged in chromatin depleted nuclei of primary human fibroblasts: evidence for the organizing role of the nuclear matrix, J. Cell. Biochem., 96, 850-857
9. Berezney, R. 1979, Dynamic properties of the nuclear matrix, In: Busch, H. (ed.), The Cell Nucleus, Academic Press: Orlando, pp. 413-456
10. Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 1989, On the role of chromatin higher-order structure and mechanical interactions in the regulation of gene expression, Speculations Sci. Technol., 12, 163-176
11. Hakes, D.J. and Berezney, R. 1991, DNA binding properties of the nuclear matrix and individual nuclear matrix proteins, J. Biol. Chem., 266, 11131-11140
12. Berezney, R. and Buchholtz, L.A. 1981, Dynamic association of replicating DNA fragments with the nuclear matrix of regenerating liver, Exp. Cell Res., 132, 1-13.
13. Maya-Mendoza, A., Hernández-Muñoz, R., Gariglio, P. and Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2005, Natural ageing in the rat liver correlates with progressive stabilisation of DNA-nuclear matrix interactions and withdrawal of genes from the nuclear substructure, Mech. Ageing Dev., 126, 767-782
14. Bode, J., Ŕos-Raḿrez, M., Mielke, C., Stengert, M., Kay, V. and Klehr-Wirth, D. 1995, Scaffold/matrix-attached regions: structural properties creating transcriptionally active loci, Int. Rev. Cytol., 162A, 389-454.
15. Zhang, Y., Xi, Z., Hedge, R.S., Shakked, Z. and Crothers, D.M. 2004, Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 8337-8341
16. Tsutsui, K., Tsutsui, K. and Muller, M.T. 1988, The nuclear scaffold exhibits DNA-binding sites selective for supercoiled DNA, J. Biol. Chem., 263, 7235-7241
17. Wei, X., Samarabandu, J., Devdhar, R.S., Siegel, A.J., Acharya, R. and Berezney, R. 1998, Segregation of transcription and replication sites into higher order domains, Science, 281, 1502-1505
18. Cook, P.R. 1999, The organization of replication and transcription, Science, 282, 1790-1795
19. Anachkova, B., Djeliova, V. and Russev, G. 2005, Nuclear matrix support of DNA replication, J. Cell Biochem., 96, 951-961
20. Aranda-Anzaldo, A. and Dent, M.A.R. 1997, Loss of DNA-loop supercoiling and organization in cells infected by herpes simplex virus type 1, Res. Virol., 148, 397-408.
21. Aranda-Anzaldo, A., Orozco-Velasco, F., Garća-Villa, E. and Gariglio, P. 1999, p53 is a rate-limiting factor in the repair of higher-order DNA structure, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1446, 181-192
22. Gombert, W.M., Farris, S.D., Rubio, E.D., Morey-Rosler, K.M., Schubach, W.H. and Krumm, A. 2003, The c-myc insulator element and matrix attachment region define the c-myc chromosomal domain, Mol. Cell Biol., 23, 9338-9348
23. Iarovaia, O.V., Bystritsky, A., Ravcheev, D., Hancock, R. and Razin, S.V. 2004, Visualization of individual DNA loops and a map of loop domains in the human dystro-phin gene, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 2079-2086
24. Petrov, A., Pirozhkova, I., Carnac, G., Laoudj, D., Lipinski, M. and Vassetzky, Y.S. 2006, Chromatin loop domain organization within the 4q35 locus in faciosca-pulohumeral dystrophy patients versus normal human myoblasts, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 6982-6987
25. Hair, A. and Vassetzky, Y. 2007, Determination of the chromatin domain structure in arrayed repeated regions: organization of the somatic 5S RNA domain during embryogenesis in Xenopus laevis, J. Cell Biochem., 102, 1140-1148
26. Kumar, P., Bischof, O., Purbey, P., et al. 2007, Functional interaction between PML and SATB1 regulates chromatin-loop architecture and transcription of the MHC class 1 locus, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 45-56.
27. Frisch, M., Frech, K., Klingenhoff, A., Cartharius, K., Liebich, I. and Werner, T. 2002, In silico prediction of scaffold/matrix attachment regions in large genomic sequences, Genome Res., 12, 349-354
28. Evans, K., Ott, S., Hansen, A., Koentges, G. and Wernisch, L. 2007, A comparative study of S/MAR prediction tools, BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 71.
29. Ottaviani, D., Lever, E., Mitter, R., et al. 2008, Reconfiguration of genomic anchors upon transcrip-tional activation of the human major histocompatibility complex, Genome Res., 18, 1778-1786.
30. Linnemann, A.K., Platts, A.E. and Krawetz, S.A. 2009, Differential nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment marks expressed genes, Hum. Mol. Genet., 18, 645-654
31. Maya-Mendoza, A. and Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2003, Positional mapping of specific DNA sequences relative to the nuclear substructure by direct polymerase chain reaction on nuclear matrix-bound templates, Anal. Biochem., 313, 196-207.
32. Singh, G.B., Kramer, J.A. and Krawetz, S.A. 1997, Mathematical model to predict regions of chromatin attachment to the nuclear matrix, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 1419-1425
33. van Drunen, C.M., Sewalt, R.G.A.B., Oosterling, R.W., Weisbeek, P.J., Smeekens, S.C.M. and van Driel, R. 1999, A bipartite sequence element associated with matrix/scaffold attachment regions, Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 2924-2930
34. Glazko, G.V., Rogozin, I.B. and Glazkov, M.V. 2001, Comparative study and prediction of DNA fragments associated with various elements of the nuclear matrix, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1517, 351-364
35. Nelson, D.L. and Cox, M.M. 2000, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 3rd edition, Worth Publishers: New York, pp. 915-918
36. Calladine, C.R., Drew, H.R., Luisi, B.F. and Travers, A.A. 2004, Understanding DNA, 3rd edition, Elsevier-Academic Press: London, pp. 94-138.
37. Bode, J., Kowhi, Y., Dickinson, L., et al. 1992, Biological significance of unwinding capability of nuclear matrix-associating DNAs, Science, 255, 195-197
38. Benham, C., Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. and Bode, J. 1997, Stress-induced duplex destabilization in scaffold/matrix attachment regions, J. Mol. Biol., 2774, 181-196
39. Maya-Mendoza, A., Hernández-Muñoz, R., Gariglio, P. and Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2004, Gene positional changes relative to the nuclear substructure during carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats, J. Cell Biochem., 93, 1084-1098
40. Lewin, B. 1980, Gene Expression 2, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons: New York, pp. 360-362
41. Gromova, I.I., Nielsen, O.F. and Razin, S.V. 1995, Long-range fragmentation of the eukaryotic genome by exogenous and endogenous nucleases proceeds in a specific fashion via preferential DNA cleavage at matrix attachment sites, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 18685-18690
42. Jin, L., Long, L., Green, M.A. and Spear, B.T. 2009, The alpha-fetoprotein enhancer region activates the albumin and alpha-fetoprotein promoters during liver development, Dev. Biol., doi:10.1016/j.dbio.2009. 09.026.
43. Razin, S.V. 1987, DNA interaction with the nuclear matrix and spatial organization of replication and transcription, BioEssays, 6, 19-23.
44. Rollini, P., Namciu, S.J., Marsden, M.D. and Fournier, R.E.K. 1999, Identification and characterization of nuclear matrix-attachment regions in the human serpin gene cluster at 14q32.1, Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 3779-3791
45. Gromova, I.I., Thomsen, B. and Razin, S.V. 1995, Different topoisomerase II antitumor drugs direct similar specific long-range fragmentation of an amplified c-myc gene locus in living cells and in high-salt-extracted nuclei, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 102-106
46. Davie, J.R. 1996, Histone modifications, chromatin structure and the nuclear matrix, J. Cell Biochem., 62, 149-157
47. Kantidze, O.L. and Razin, S.V. 2009, Chromatin loops, illegitimate recombination and genome evolution, BioEssays, 31, 278-286
48. Lazarevich, N.L. 2000, Molecular mechanisms of alpha-fetoprotein gene expression, Biochemistry (Mosc.), 65, 117-133
49. Pinkert, C.A., Ornitz, D.M., Brinster, R.L. and Palmiter, R.D. 1987, An albumin enhancer located 10 kb upstream functions along with its promoter to direct efficient, liver-specific expression in transgenic mice, Genes Dev., 1, 268-276
50. Mitchell, J.A. and Fraser, P. 2008, Transcription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcription, Genes Dev., 22, 20-25
51. Jackson, D.A. and Pombo, A. 1998, Replicon clusters are stable units of chromosome structure: evidence that nuclear organization contributes to the efficient activation and propagation of S phase in human cells, J. Cell Biol., 140, 1285-1295
52. Dimitrova, D.S. and Berezney, R. 2002, The spatio-temporal organization of DNA replication sites is identical in primary, immortalized and transformed mammalian cells, J. Cell Sci., 115, 4037-4051
53. Osborne, C.S., Chakalova, L., Mitchell, J.A., et al. 2007, Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh, PLoS Biol., 5, e192.
54. Linnemann, A.K. and Krawetz, S.A. 2009, Maintenance of a functional higher order chromatin structure: the role of the nuclear matrix in normal and disease states, Gene Ther. Mol. Biol., 13, 231-243
55. Mart́inez-Ramos, I., Maya-Mendoza, A., Gariglio, P. and Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2005, A global but stable change in HeLa cell morphology induces reorganization of DNA structural loop domains within the cell nucleus, J. Cell Biochem., 96, 79-88.
56. Aranda-Anzaldo, A. 2009, A structural basis for cellular senescence, Aging, 1, 598-607.
57. Lemaitre, J-M., Danis, E., Pasero, P., Vassetzky, Y. and Mechali, M. 2005, Mitotic remodelling of the replicon and chromosome structure, Cell, 123, 787-801.
58. Bennett, M.D. 1977, The time and duration of meiosis, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 277, 201-226