Complexity of categorical syllogisms: An integration of two metrics

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 391-421

  Zielinski, Tracey A ^a   Goodwin, Geoffrey P ^b   Halford, Graeme S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Categorical syllogisms; Deductive reasoning; Mental models; Reasoning strategies; Relational complexity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOMETRY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYLLOGISM; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 77951679937     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440902830509     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, G., Birney, D. P., & Halford, G. S. (2006). Relational processing and working memory in the comprehension of complex relative clause sentences. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1325-1340. (Pubitemid 46044221)
2. Andrews, G, & Halford, G S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153-219. (Pubitemid 39659783)
3. Andrews, G., Halford, G. S., Bunch, K. M., Bowden, D., & Jones, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74, 1476-1499. (Pubitemid 37268983)
4. Begg, I., & Denny, J. P. (1969). Empirical reconciliation of atmosphere and conversion interpretations of syllogistic reasoning errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 351-354.
5. Birney, D. P., & Halford, G S. (2002). Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task. Thinking and Reasoning, 8, 109-134.
6. Birney, D. P., Halford, G S., & Andrews, G (2006). The influence of relational complexity on reasoning: The development of the Latin Square Task. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 146-171. (Pubitemid 43189664)
7. Boag, C., Neal, A., Loft, S., & Halford, G (2006). An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task. Ergonomics, 14, 1508-1526. (Pubitemid 44530543)
8. Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 247-303.
9. English, L. D., & Halford, G S. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Espino, O., Santamaria, C., & Garcia-Madruga, J. A. (2000). Activation of end-terms in syllogistic reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 6, 67-89.
11. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: Extension and evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(3), 378-395. (Pubitemid 44829166)
12. Evans, J. S. B. T, Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Gibson, E. J. (2000). Commentary on perceptual and conceptual processes in infancy. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 43-48.
14. Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468-493.
15. Halford, G S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Halford, G S. (2009) Complexity provides a better explanation than probability for confidence in syllogistic inferences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 91-91.
17. Halford, G S., & Andrews, G (2004). The development of deductive reasoning: How important is complexity? Thinking and Reasoning, 10, 123-145. (Pubitemid 38706693)
18. Halford, G S., & Andrews, G (2006). Reasoning and problem solving. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 557-608). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Halford, G S., Andrews, G, Dalton, C., Boag, C., & Zielinski, T. (2002). Young children's performance on the balance scale: The influence of relational complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 417-445. (Pubitemid 36860458)
20. Halford, G S., Andrews, G, & Jensen, I. (2002). Integration of category induction and hierarchical classification: One paradigm at two levels of complexity. Journal of Cognition and Development, 3, 143-177. (Pubitemid 44783569)
21. Halford, G S., Baker, R., McCredden, J. E., & Bain, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16(1), 70-76. (Pubitemid 40176530)
22. Halford, G S., Cowan, N, & Andrews, G (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 236-242. (Pubitemid 46809558)
23. Halford, G S., Wilson, W H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-831. (Pubitemid 29067643)
24. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
25. Johnson-Laird, P. N, & Bara, B. G (1984). Syllogistic inference. Cognition, 16, 1-61.
26. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1996). Authors' response: Mental models and syllogisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 543-546.
28. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Steedman, M. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 64-99.
29. Markovits, H., & Barrouillet, P. (2002). The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review, 22, 5-36. (Pubitemid 39659773)
30. Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D., & Halford, G. S. (1986). Information processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 600-613.
31. Newstead, S. E., Handley, S. J, & Buck, E. (1999). Falsifying mental models: Testing the predictions of theories of syllogistic reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 27, 344-354. (Pubitemid 29190651)
32. Newstead, S. E., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2002). Generating alternatives: A key component in human reasoning? Memory and Cognition, 30, 129-137.
33. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34. Oberauer, K., Sub, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36(6), 641-652.
35. Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1995). Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychological Review, 102, 533-566.
36. Roberts, M. J. (2005). Expanding the universe of categorical syllogisms: A challenge for reasoning researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 37(4), 560-580.
37. Stadtler, M. A. (1992). Statistical structure and implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 318-327.
38. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
39. Stenning, K., & Yule, P. (1997). Image and language in human reasoning: A syllogistic illustration. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 109-159. (Pubitemid 127376012)
40. Stupple, E. J. N, & Ball, L. J. (2007). Figural effects in a syllogistic evaluation paradigm: An inspection time analysis. Experimental Psychology, 54(2), 120-127.
41. Van den Bos, E., & Poletiek, F. H. (2008). Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1122-1131.
42. Woodworth, R. S., & Sells, S. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in formal syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 451-460.