Reasoning about relations

Psychological Review

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 468-493

  Goodwin, Geoffrey P ^a   Johnson Laird, P N ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; HUMAN; LOGIC; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; LOGIC; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 16244420144     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.468     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Allen, J. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 26, 832-843.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 85, 249-277.
3. Andrews, G., & Halford, G. S. (1994). Relational complexity and sentence processing. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46(Suppl. 1), 1.
4. Andrews, G., & Halford, G. S. (2002). A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 153-219.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
6. Bara, B., Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). The development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 157-193.
7. Barclay, J. R. (1973). The role of comprehension in remembering sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 229-254.
8. Bar-Hillel, Y. (1967). Dictionaries and meaning rules. Foundations of Language, 3, 409-414.
9. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
10. Barwise, J. (1993). Everyday reasoning and logical inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 337-338.
11. Bauer, M. I., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). How diagrams can improve reasoning. Psychological Science, 4, 372-378.
12. Bell, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). A model theory of modal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 22, 25-51.
13. Berendt, B. (1996). Explaining preferred mental models in Allen inferences with a metrical model of imagery. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 489-494). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Birney, D. P., & Halford, G. S. (2002). Cognitive complexity of suppositional reasoning: An application of the relational complexity metric to the knight-knave task. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 109-134.
15. Braine, M. D. S., & O'Brien, D. P. (Eds.). (1998). Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Brainerd, C. J., & Kingma, J. (1984). Do children have to remember to reason: A fuzzy-trace theory of transitivity development. Developmental Review, 4, 311-377.
17. Breslow, L. (1981). Reevaluation of the literature on the development of transitive inferences. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 325-351.
18. Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Strategies in syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Science, 23, 247-303.
19. Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (in press). Naïve deontics: A theory of meaning, representation, and reasoning. Cognitive Psychology.
20. Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564-575.
21. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Carreiras, M., & Santamaría, C. (1997). Reasoning about relations: Spatial and non-spatial problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 191-208.
23. Cech, C. C., & Shoben, E. J. (1980). Componential reasoning in kinship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 393-421.
24. Cedrus Corporation. (1999). SuperLab Pro (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. San Pedro, CA: Author.
25. Cherubini, P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Does everyone love everyone? The psychology of iterative inferences. Thinking & Reasoning, 10, 31-53.
26. Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 76, 387-404.
27. Clement, C. A., & Falmagne, R. J. (1986). Logical reasoning, world knowledge, and mental imagery: Interconnections in cognitive processes. Memory & Cognition, 14, 299-307.
28. Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and action (pp. 81-95). Pittsburgh, PA: The University Press.
29. De Soto, C. B., London, M., & Handel, S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 513-521.
30. Dierckx, V., Vandierendonck, A., & Pandelaere, M. (2003). Is model construction open to strategic decisions? An exploration of the field of linear reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 9, 97-131.
31. Dipert, R. (1996). Reflections on iconicity, representation, and resemblance: Peirce's theory of signs, Goodman on resemblance, and modern philosophies of language and mind. Synthese, 106, 373-397.
32. Egan, D. E., & Grimes-Farrow, D. D. (1982). Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 10, 297-307.
33. Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296-306.
34. English, L. D. (1998). Children's reasoning in solving relational problems of deduction, Thinking & Reasoning, 4, 249-281.
35. Evans, J. St. B. T. (1980). Thinking: Experimental and information processing approaches. In G. Claxton (Ed.), Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 275-299), London: Routledge.
36. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454-459.
37. Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., Harper, C. N. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Reasoning about necessity and possibility: A test of the mental model theory of deduction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1495-1513.
38. Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Evans, J. St. B. T., Over, D. E., & Handley, S. H. (in press). Rethinking the model theory of conditionals. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendonck, W. Schroyens, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), The mental models theory of reasoning: Refinements and extensions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Poos, P. W., Smith, K. H., Sabol, M. A., & Mynatt, B. T. (1976). Constructive processes in simple linear order problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 759-766.
41. Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. V. (1996). The mental models theory of language comprehension. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 313-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Goldvarg, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2001). Naïve causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning. Cognitive Science, 25, 565-610.
43. Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
44. Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004a). Fallacies in reasoning about relations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
45. Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004b). Reasoning about relations between relations. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Hagert, G. (1984). Modeling mental models: Experiments in cognitive modeling of spatial reasoning. In T. O'Shea (Ed.), Advances in artificial intelligence (pp. 389-398). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
47. Halford, G. S. (1984). Can young children integrate premises in transitivity and serial order tasks? Cognitive Psychology, 16, 65-93.
48. Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Halford, G. S., Baker, R., McCredden, J. E., & Bain, J. D. (2005). How many variables can humans process? Psychological Science, 16, 70-76.
50. Halford, G. S., Smith, S. B., Dickson, J. C., Maybery, M. T., Kelly, M. E., Bain, J. D., & Stewart, J. E. M. (1995). Modeling the development of reasoning strategies: The roles of analogy, knowledge, and capacity. In T. J. Simon & G. S. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modeling (pp. 77-156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., Quo, J., Gayler, R. W., Wiles, J., & Stewart, J. E. M. (1994). Connectionist implications for processing capacity limitations in analogies. In K. J. Holyoak & J. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2: Analogical connections (pp. 363-415). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
52. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998a). Authors' response: Relational complexity metric is effective when assessments are based on actual cognitive processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 848-864.
53. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998b). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803-831.
54. Haviland, S., & Clark, E. (1974). This man's father is my father's son: A study of the acquisition of kin terms. Journal of Child Language, 1, 23-47.
55. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
56. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). A process model of human transitive inference. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 279-305). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization. Psychological Review, 110, 220-264.
58. Hunt, E., & Lansman, M. (1982), Individual differences in attention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 207-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Hunter, I. M. L. (1957). The solving of three term series problems. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 286-298.
60. Huttenlocher, J. (1968), Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75, 550-560.
61. Jahn, G., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Knauff, M. (2004). Reasoning about consistency with spatial mental models: Hidden and obvious indeterminacy in spatial descriptions. In C. Freksa, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.), Spatial cognition IV - Reasoning, action, interaction (pp. 165-180). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
62. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Holt.
63. Jeffrey, R. (1981). Formal logic: Its scope and limits (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The three-term series problem. Cognition, 1, 57-82.
65. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Peirce, logic diagrams, and the elementary operations of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 69-95.
67. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byme, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference. Psychological Review, 109, 646-678.
69. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. ( 2004). Reasoning from inconsistency to consistency. Psychological Review, 111, 640-661.
70. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Hasson, U. (2003). Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1105-1113.
71. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. (2000, April 21). Illusions in reasoning about consistency. Science, 288, 531-532.
72. Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., Legrenzi, M. S., & Caverni, J.-P. (1999). Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 106, 62-88.
73. Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., & Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 3, 9-47.
74. Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Reasoning, models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 559-573.
75. Knauff, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Imagery can impede inference. Memory & Cognition, 30, 363-371.
76. Knauff, M., Jola, C., & Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In D. R. Montello (Ed.), Spatial information theory: Foundations of geographic information science. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (pp. 447-457). New York: Springer.
77. Knauff, M., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen's calculus. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The development of logic. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
79. Kroger, J. K., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Varieties of sameness: The impact of relational complexity on perceptual comparisons. Cognitive Science, 28, 335-358.
80. Lansman, M., & Hunt, E. B. (1982). Individual differences in secondary task performance. Memory & Cognition, 10, 10-24.
81. Leeuwenberg, E. L. L. (1969). Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 76, 216-220.
82. Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 470-475.
83. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: Freeman.
84. Maybery, M. T., Bain, J. D., & Halford, G. S. (1986). Information processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 600-613.
85. McTaggart, J. M. E. (1927). The nature of existence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
86. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1982). Transformational studies of the internal representations of three-dimensional objects. In R. N. Shepard & L. A. Cooper (Eds.), Mental images and their transformations (pp. 25-71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Reprinted from Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium, by R. L. Solso, Ed., 1974, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)
87. Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N. (1982). Transformational studies of the internal representations of three-dimensional objects. In R. N. Shepard & L. A. Cooper (Eds.), Mental images and their transformations (pp. 25-71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Reprinted from Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium, by R. L. Solso, Ed., 1974, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum)
88. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
89. Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
90. Montague, R. (1974). Formal philosophy: Selected papers. New Haven: Yale University Press.
91. Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., & Griggs, R. A. (1986). Response bias in relational reasoning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 95-98.
92. Oaksford, M. (2002). Contrast classes and matching bias as explanations of the effects of negation on conditional reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 135-151.
93. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101, 608-631.
94. Oberauer, K., & Wilhelm, O. (2000). Effects of directionality in deductive reasoning: I. The comprehension of single relational premises. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1702-1712.
95. Oden, G. C., & Lopes, L. L. (1980). Kin search: Answering questions about relations among relatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 479-491.
96. Ohlsson, S. (1984). Induced strategy shifts in spatial reasoning. Acta Psychologica, 57, 46-67.
97. Ormerod, T. C., & Richardson, J. (2003). On the generation and evaluation of inferences from single premises. Memory & Cognition, 31, 467-478.
98. Ormrod, J. E. (1979). Cognitive processes in the solution of three-term series problems. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 235-255.
99. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. (8 Vols.; C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Piaget, J. (1928). Judgment and reasoning in the child. London: Routledge.
101. Potts, G. R. (1978). The role of inference in memory for real and artificial information. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer (Eds.), Human reasoning (pp. 139-161). New York: Wiley.
102. Potts, G. R., & Scholtz, K. W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 439-452.
103. Proctor, P. (Ed.). (1978). The Longman dictionary of contemporary English (LCODE). London: Longman.
104. Psychology Software Tools. (2002). E-Prime (Version 1.1) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
105. Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16-45.
106. Pylyshyn, Z. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 25, 157-238.
107. Quinton, G., & Fellows, B. J. (1975). "Perceptual" strategies in the solving of three-term series problems. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 69-78.
108. Richardson, J. T. E. (1987). The role of mental imagery in models of transitive inference. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 189-203.
109. Riley, C. A. (1976). The representation of comparative relations and the transitive inference task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 1-22.
110. Riley, C. A., & Trabasso, T. (1974). Comparatives, logical structures and encoding in a transitive inference task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 187-203.
111. Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
112. Roberts, M. J. (2000). Strategies in relational inference. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 1-26.
113. Schaeken, W. S., Girotto, V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). The effect of an irrelevant premise on temporal and spatial reasoning. Kognitionswisschenschaft, 7, 27-32.
114. Schaeken, W. S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Strategies in temporal reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 6, 193-219.
115. Schaeken, W. S., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). Mental models and temporal reasoning. Cognition, 60, 205-234.
116. Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2001). The processing of negations in conditional reasoning: A meta-analytic case study in mental model and/or mental logic theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 7, 121-172.
117. Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., & Handley, S. J. (2003). In search of counter-examples: Deductive rationality in human reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56(A), 1129-1145.
118. Shaver, P., Pierson, L., & Lang, S. (1975). Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving. Cognition, 3, 359-375.
119. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971, February 19). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
120. Shin, S.-J. (1994). Peirce and the logical status of diagrams. History and Philosophy of Logic, 15, 45-68.
121. Shin, S.-J. (2002). The iconic logic of Peirce's graphs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
123. Sloutsky, V. M., & Goldvarg, Y. (1999). Effects of externalization on representation of indeterminate problems. In M. Hahn & S. Stones (Eds.), Proceeding of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 695-700). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Sowa, J. F. (1984). Conceptual structures: Information processing in mind and machine. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
125. Springer, K. (1992). Children's awareness of the biological implications of kinship. Child Development, 63, 950-959.
126. Springer, K. (1995). Acquiring a naïve theory of kinship through inference. Child Development, 66, 547-558.
127. Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
128. Steedman, M. J. (1982). Reference to past time. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 125-157). London: Wiley.
129. Stenning, K. (1996). The cognitive impact of diagrams. In A. Clark, J. Ezquerro, & J. M. Larrazabal (Eds.), Philosophy and cognitive science; Categories, consciousness, and reasoning (pp. 181-196). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
130. Stenning, K., & Oberlander, J. (1995). A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19, 97-140.
131. Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 119-159.
132. Sternberg, R. J., & Weil, E. M. (1980). An aptitude-strategy interaction in linear syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 226-239.
133. Trabasso, T., Riley, C. A., & Wilson, E. G. (1975). The representation of linear order and spatial strategies in reasoning: A developmental study. In R. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process (pp. 201-229). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
134. Van der Henst, J.-B. (2002). Mental model theory versus the inference rule approach in relational reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 193-203.
135. Van der Henst, J.-B., Sperber, D., & Politzer, G. (2002). When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 8, 1-20
136. Van der Henst, J.-B., Yang, Y., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002). Strategies in sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 425-468.
137. Vandierendonck, A., & De Vooght, G. (1996). Evidence for mental-model-based reasoning: A comparison of reasoning with time and space. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 249-272.
138. Vandierendonck, A., De Vooght, G., Desimpelaere, C., & Dierckx, V. (1999). Model construction and elaboration in spatial linear syllogisms. In W. S. Schaeken, G. De Vooght, A. Vandierendonck, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), Deductive reasoning and strategies (pp. 191-207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
139. Verweij, A. C., Sijtsma, K., & Koops, W. (1999). An ordinal scale for transitive reasoning by means of a deductive strategy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 241-264.
140. Walsh, C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Co-reference and reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 32, 96-106.
141. Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boone, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M., et al. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119-125.
142. Winkelmann, J. H. (1980). Semantic representation of kinship systems. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 133-140.
143. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
144. Wood, D. J. (1969, July 5). Approach to the study of human reasoning. Nature, 223, 102-103.
145. Wood, D. J., & Shotter, J. D. (1973). A preliminary study of distinctive features in problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 504-510.
146. Wood, D. J., Shotter, J. D., & Godden, D. (1974). An investigation of the relationships between problem solving strategies, representation and memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 252-257.
147. Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. New York: Holt.