Ethical issues in social psychology research

The SAGE Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 45-70

  Kimmel, Allan J ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951662069     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976190.n3     Document Type: Chapter

References (115)

1. Adair J. G. Dushenko T. W. Lindsay R. C. L. Ethical regulations and their impact on research practice American Psychologist 40 (1985) 59-72doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.1.59 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.1.59
2. Allen C. Spies like us: When sociologists deceive their subjects Lingua Franca 7 (1997) 30-39
3. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2002). Code of professional ethics and practices. Retrieved February 15, 2003, from http://www.aapor.org
4. American Psychological Association. (1982). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct 2002. Retrieved February 17, 2003, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
6. American Psychological Association, Ad Hoc Committee on Ethical Standards in Psychological Research. (1973). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J.(1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 1-79). Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Australian Psychological Society. (1986). Code of professional conduct. Parkville, Victoria, Australia: Author.
9. Azar B. Ethics at the cost of research? Monitor on Psychology 33 (2002) 38-40
10. Baumrind D. Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's 'Behavioral study of obedience.' American Psychologist 19 (1964) 421-423doi:10.1037/h0040128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040128
11. Baumrind D. Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited American Psychologist 40 (1985) 165-174doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.2.165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.2.165
12. Bearden W. O. Madden C. S. Uscategui K. The pool is drying up Marketing Research 10 (1998) 26-33
13. Behnke S. H. Kinscherff R. Must a psychologist report past child abuse? Monitor on Psychology 33 (2002) 56-57
14. Berenbeim, R. E.(1992). Corporate ethics practices. New York: The Conference Board.
15. Berkun M. Bialek H. M. Kern P. R. Yagi K. Experimental studies of psychological stress in man Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 76 (1962) 1-39doi:10.1037/h0093835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0093835
16. British Psychological Society. (1995). Code of conduct, ethical principles and guidelines. Leicester, UK: Author.
17. Broder A. Deception can be acceptable American Psychologist 53 (1998) 85-86doi:10.1037/h0092168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092168
18. Campbell D. Sanderson R. E. Laverty S. G. Characteristics of a conditioned response in human subjects during extinction trials following a single traumatic conditioning trial Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 68 (1964) 627-639doi:10.1037/h0042582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0042582
19. Canadian Psychological Association. (1991). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (Rev. ed.). Old Chelsea, Quebec: Author.
20. Ceci S. J. Peters D. Plotkin J. Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research American Psychologist 40 (1985) 994-1002doi:10.1037/0003-066X.40.9.994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.9.994
21. Chonko, L. B.(1995). Ethical decision-making in marketing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Christensen L. Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 14 (1988) 664-675doi:10.1177/0146167288144002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167288144002
23. Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos. (1993). Código deontológico del psicólogo [Deontological code of the psychologist]. Madrid: Author.
24. Collins F. L. Jr. Kuhn I. F. Jr. King G. D. Variables affecting subjects' ethical ratings of proposed experiments Psychological Reports 44 (1979) 155-164doi:10.2466/pr0.1979.44.1.155 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.44.1.155
25. Colombo J. Cost, utility, and judgments of institutional review boards Psychological Science 6 (1995) 318-319doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00518.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00518.x
26. Council for Marketing and Opinion Research. (1999). Respondent bill of rights. Retrieved February 15, 2003, from http://www.cmor.org
27. Council of American Survey Research Organizations. (1995). Code of standards for survey research. Port Jefferson, NY: Author.
28. Department of Health and Human Services Final regulations amending basic HHS policy for the protection of human research subjects (45 CFR, Pt. 46) Federal Register 46 (16) (1981, January 26) 8366-8391
29. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Protection of human subjects: Technical amendments (45 CFR, Pt. 46) Federal Register 40 (1975, March 13) 11854-11858
30. Diamond S. S. Morton D. R. Empirical landmarks in social psychology Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4 (1978) 217-221doi:10.1177/014616727800400208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400208
31. Diener E. Over-concern with research ethics Dialogue 16 (2001) 2
32. Diener, E., & Crandall, R.(1978). Ethics in social and behavioral research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
33. Diener E. Matthews R. Smith R. Leakage of experimental information to potential future subjects by debriefed subjects Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 6 (1972) 264-267
34. Epstein Y. M. Suedfeld P. Silverstein S. J. The experimental contract: Subjects' expectations of and reactions to some behaviors of experimenters American Psychologist 28 (1973) 212-221doi:10.1037/h0034454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034454
35. European Federation of Psychology Associations. (1998). Ethical principles for Scandinavian psychologists. Brussels: Author.
36. Fédération Suisse des Psychologues. (1991). Code déontologique. Lausanne, Switzerland: Author.
37. Fischman, M. W.(2000). Informed consent. In B. D. Sales & S. Folkman (Eds.), Ethics in research with human participants (35-48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Frankena, W. K.(1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. French Psychological Society. (1976). Code de déontologie. Paris: Author.
40. Geller, D. M.(1982). Alternatives to deception: Why, what, and how? In J. E. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Surveys and experiments (39-55). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_2
41. German Association of Professional Psychologists. (1986). Professional code of ethics for psychologists. Bonn: Author.
42. Gray B. Cooke R. A. The impact of institutional review boards on research Hastings Center Report 10 (1980) 36-41doi:10.2307/3560505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3560505
43. Greenberg M. Role playing: An alternative to deception? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 7 (1967) 152-157doi:10.1037/h0025000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0025000
44. Grundner, T. M.(1986). Informed consent: A tutorial. Owings Mills, MD: National Health Publishing.
45. Hansen C. Regulatory changes affecting IRBs and researchers APS Observer 14 (7) (2001) 13-14, 25
46. Haywood H. C. The ethics of doing research and of not doing it American Journal of Mental Deficiency 81 (1976) 311-317
47. Holmes D. S. Debriefing after psychological experiments American Psychologist 31 (1976) 858-867doi:10.1037/0003-066X.31.12.858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.31.12.858
48. Horowitz, I. L.(1967). The rise and fall of Project Camelot. Cambridge: MIT Press.
49. Humphrey, L.(1970). Tearoom trade. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
50. Ilgen D. R. Bell B. S. Informed consent and dual purpose research American Psychologist 56 (2001) 1177doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.12.1177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.12.1177
51. International Chamber of Commerce/European Society for Opinion and Marketing Research. (2001). ICC/ESOMAR international code of marketing and social research practice. Retrieved February 14, 2003 from http://www.esomar.nl
52. Jones S. E. Ethics code draft published for comment Monitor on Psychology 32 (2) (2001) 76
53. Kamins M. A. Folkes V. S. Perner L. Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news Journal of Consumer Psychology 6 (1997) 165-187doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0602_03 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0602_03
54. Kelman H. C. Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments Psychological Bulletin 67 (1967) 1-11doi:10.1037/h0024072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024072
55. Kelman, H. C.(1996). Foreword. In A. J. Kimmel, Ethical issues in behavioral research: A survey (pp. xiii-xv). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
56. Kimmel, A. J.(1988). Ethics and values in applied social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. Kimmel A. J. Predictable biases in the ethical decision making of American psychologists American Psychologist 46 (1991) 786-788doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.7.786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.7.786
58. Kimmel, A. J.(1996). Ethical issues in behavioral research: A survey. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
59. Kimmel A. J. Ethical trends in marketing and psychological research Ethics & Behavior 11 (2001) 131-149doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1102_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1102_2
60. Kimmel, A. J., & Audrain, A.-F.(2002, August). Rumor control strategies within French consumer goods firms. Paper presented at the 110th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
61. Kimmel A. J. Smith N. C. Deception in marketing research: Ethical, methodological, and disciplinary implications Psychology & Marketing 18 (2001) 663-689doi:10.1002/mar.1025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.1025
62. Korn J. H. Students' roles, rights, and responsibilities as research participants Teaching of Psychology 15 (1988) 74-78doi:10.1207/s15328023top1502_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1502_2
63. Kuschel R. The necessity for code of ethics in research Psychiatry Today: Journal of the Yugoslav Psychiatric Association 30 (1998) 247-274
64. Landis M. H. Burtt H. E. A study of conversations Journal of Comparative Psychology 4 (1924) 81-89doi:10.1037/h0071502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0071502
65. Latané, B., & Darley, J. M.(1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
66. Lindsay R.C.L. Holden R. R. The introductory psychology subject pool in Canada Canadian Psychology 28 (1987) 45-52doi:10.1037/h0079868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0079868
67. McCord D. M. Ethics-sensitive management of the university human subject pool American Psychologist 46 (1991) 151doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.151.a http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.151.a
68. McNamara J. R. Woods K. M. Ethical considerations in psychological research: A comparative review Behavior Therapy 8 (1977) 703-708doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80202-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894%2877%2980202-5
69. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67 (1963) 371-378doi:10.1037/h0040525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
70. Miller A. G. Collins B. E. Brief D. E. Perspectives on obedience to authority: The legacy of the Milgram experiments Journal of Social Issues 51 (1995) 1-19doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01331.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01331.x
71. Mills J. A procedure for explaining experiments involving deception Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2 (1976) 3-13doi:10.1177/014616727600200102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616727600200102
72. Mirvis, P. H., & Seashore, S. E.(1982). Creating ethical relationships in organizational research. In J. E. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Surveys and experiments (79-104). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5719-6_4
73. Moore H. T. Further data concerning sex differences Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 17 (1922) 210-214doi:10.1037/h0064645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0064645
74. Mordock J. B. Institutional review boards in applied settings: Their role in judgments of quality and consumer protection Psychological Science 6 (1995) 320-321doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00519.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00519.x
75. Mueller J. H. Furedy J. J. Reviewing for risk: What's the evidence that it works? APS Observer 14 (7) (2001) 1, 26-28
76. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
77. National Research Act, Public Law 93-348, Title II Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (Part A). (1974).
78. Netherlands Institute of Psychologists. (1988). Professional code for psychologists. Amsterdam: Author.
79. Nicks S. D. Korn J. H. Mainieri T. The rise and fall of deception in social psychology and personality research, 1921 to 1994 Ethics & Behavior 7 (1997) 69-77doi:10.1207/s15327019eb0701_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0701_6
80. Nosek B. A. Banaji M. R. Greenwald A. G. E-research: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet Journal of Social Issues 58 (2002) 161-176doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00254
81. Nuremberg Code. (1949). In Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, 2 (181-182). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
82. Office for Protection From Research Risks, Protection of Human Subjects. (1991, June 18). Protection of human subjects: Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 (GPO 1992 O-307-551). OPRR Reports, 4-17.
83. Orne M. T. The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 58 (1959) 277-299doi:10.1037/h0046128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046128
84. Orne M. T. Holland C. H. On the ecological validity of laboratory deceptions International Journal of Psychiatry 6 (1968) 282-293
85. Ortmann A. Hertwig R. Is deception acceptable? American Psychologist 52 (1997) 746-747doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.746
86. Patten S. C. Milgram's shocking experiments Philosophy 52 (1977) 425-440doi:10.1017/S0031819100028916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100028916
87. Prentice E. D. Antonson D. L. A protocol review guide to reduce IRB inconsistency IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 9 (1987) 9-11doi:10.2307/3563646 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3563646
88. Psychological Association of Slovenia. (1982). Code of ethics for psychologists. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Author.
89. Raupp C. D. Cohen D. C. 'A thousand points of light' illuminate the psychology curriculum: Volunteering as a learning experience Teaching of Psychology 19 (1992) 25-30doi:10.1207/s15328023top1901_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1901_5
90. Resnick J. H. Schwartz T. Ethical standards as an independent variable in psychological research American Psychologist 28 (1973) 134-139doi:10.1037/h0034208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034208
91. Reynolds, P. D.(1979). Ethical dilemmas and social science research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
92. Rosenthal R. Science and ethics in conducting, analyzing, and reporting psychological research Psychological Science 5 (1994) 127-134doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00646.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00646.x
93. Rosenthal R. Rosnow R. L. Applying Hamlet's question to the ethical conduct of research: A conceptual addendum American Psychologist 39 (1984) 561-563doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.5.561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.5.561
94. Rosnow R. L. Hedgehogs, foxes, and the evolving social contract in psychological science: Ethical challenges and methodological opportunities Psychological Methods 2 (1997) 345-356doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.345 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.4.345
95. Rosnow R. L. Aiken L. S. Mediation of artifacts in behavioral research Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9 (1973) 189-201doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90009-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2873%2990009-7
96. Rosnow R. L. Rotheram-Borus M. J. Ceci S. J. Blanck P. D. Koocher G. P. The institutional review board as a mirror of scientific and ethical standards American Psychologist 48 (1993) 821-826doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.7.821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.7.821
97. Ross L. Lepper M. R. Hubbard M. Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1975) 880-892doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
98. Schlenker B. R. Forsyth D. R. On the ethics of psychological research Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13 (1977) 369-396doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90006-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2877%2990006-3
99. Schuler, H.(1982). Ethical problems in psychological research. New York: Academic Press.
100. Sharf, B. F.(1999). Beyond Netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (243-256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452231471 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231471
101. Sharpe D. Adair J. G. Roese N. J. Twenty years of deception research: A decline in subjects' trust? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18 (1992) 585-590doi:10.1177/0146167292185009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185009
102. Shea C. Don't talk to the humans: The crackdown on social science research Lingua Franca 10 (2000) 26-34
103. Smith C. P. How (un)acceptable is research involving deception? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 3 (1981) 1-4doi:10.2307/3564313 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3564313
104. Smith, N. C., & Klein, J. G.(1999). Ethics in marketing research and the use of remedial measures to mitigate the deception of respondents. Unpublished manuscript, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University.
105. Smith, N. C., Klein, J. G., & Kimmel, A. J.(2002). The ethics of deception in consumer research. Unpublished manuscript, London Business School.
106. Stricker L. J. Messick S. Jackson D. N. Suspicion of deception: Implications for conformity research Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5 (1967) 379-389doi:10.1037/h0021209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0021209
107. Sullivan D. S. Deiker T. A. Subject-experimenter perceptions of ethical issues in human research American Psychologist 28 (1973) 587-591doi:10.1037/h0034831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0034831
108. Tanke, E. D., & Tanke, T. J.(1982). Regulation and education: The role of the institutional review board in social science research. In J. E. Sieber (Ed.), The ethics of social research: Fieldwork, regulation, and publication (131-149). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5722-6_6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5722-6_6
109. Taylor K. M. Shepperd J. A. Probing suspicion among participants in deception research American Psychologist 51 (1996) 886-887doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.8.886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.8.886
110. Toy D. Olson J. Wright L. Effects of debriefing in marketing research involving 'mild' deceptions Psychology & Marketing 6 (1989) 69-85doi:10.1002/mar.4220060105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220060105
111. Toy D. Wright L. Olson J. A conceptual framework for analyzing deception and debriefing effects in marketing research Psychology & Marketing 18 (2001) 663-689doi:10.1002/mar.1026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.1026
112. Tybout A. M. Calder B. J. Sternthal B. Using information processing theory to design marketing strategies Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1981) 73-79doi:10.2307/3151315 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151315
113. Vinacke W. E. Deceiving experimental subjects American Psychologist 9 (1954) 155doi:10.1037/h0055445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0055445
114. Vitelli R. The crisis issue assessed: An empirical analysis Basic and Applied Social Psychology 9 (1988) 301-309doi:10.1207/s15324834basp0904_5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0904_5
115. Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, J. B.(1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.