The rise and fall of deception in social psychology and personality research, 1921 to 1994

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 69-77

  Nicks, Sandra D ^a   Korn, James H ^b   Mainieri, Tina ^c  

^a CHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deception; History of psychology; Research methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HISTORY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGY; RECUMBENCY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL CHANGE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ATTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; DECEPTION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HISTORY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HUMANS; LITERATURE; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SOCIAL CHANGE; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0030667574     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0701_6     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Adair, J. G., Dushenko, T. W., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1985). Ethical regulations and their impact on research practice. American Psychologist, 40, 59-72.
2. Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
3. American Psychological Association. (1973). Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, DC: Author.
4. Aronson, E., Brewer, M., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1985). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 441-486). New York: Random House.
5. Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1968). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-79). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6. Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Bury, A. S. (1990). A comparative citation analysis of attribution theory and the theory of cognitive dissonance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 274-283.
7. Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "Behavioral study of obedience." American Psychologist, 19, 421-423.
8. Cason, H. (1925). Influence of suggestion on imagery in a group situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20, 294-299.
9. Christensen, L. (1988). Deception in psychological research: When is its use justified? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 664-675.
10. Christie, R. (1965). Some implications of research trends in social psychology. In O. Klineberg & R. Christie (Eds.), Perspectives in social psychology (pp. 141-152). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
11. Craik, K. H. (1986). Personality research methods: An historical perspective. Journal of Personality, 54, 18-51.
12. Faden, R. R., & Beauchamp, T. L. (1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.