Lawlessness in the federal sentencing process: A test for uniformity and consistency in sentence outcomes

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 362-393

  Anderson, Amy L ^a   Spohn, Cassia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Judges; Multilevel modeling; Sentencing; Sentencing guidelines

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951660157     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820902936683     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247-266.
2. Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review, 31(4), 789-822.
3. Albonetti, C. A. (2002). The joint conditioning effect of defendant's gender and ethnicity on length of imprisonment under the federal sentencing guidelines for drug trafficking/manufacturing offenders. Journal of Gender, Race, and Justice, 6(1), 39-60.
4. Anderson, J. M., Kling, J. R., & Stith, K. (1999). Measuring interjudge sentencing disparity: Before and after the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1, Part 2), 271-307.
5. Berry, D. A. (1987). Logarithmic transformations in ANOVA. Biometrics, 43, 439-456.
6. Bontrager, S., Bales, W., & Chiricos, T. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43(3), 589-622.
7. Bridges, G., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
8. Britt, C. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17(4), 707-732.
9. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park: Sage.
10. Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1157-1198.
11. Eisenstein, J., Flemming, R. B., & Nardulli, P. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
12. Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminol-ogy, 38(4), 1207-1230.
13. Everett, R. S., & Wojtkiewicz, R. A. (2002). Difference, disparity, and race/ethnicity bias in federal sentencing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 189-211.
14. Fearn, N. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 452-487.
15. Frankel, M.(1972a). Criminal sentences: Law without order. New York: Hall & Wang.
16. Frankel, M. (1972b). Lawlessness in sentencing. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 41, 1-54.
17. Gibson, J. L. (1978). Race as a determinant of criminal sentences: A methodological critique and a case study. Law & Society Review, 12, 455-478.
18. Goldman, S., Slotnick, E., Gryski, G., Zuk, G., & Schiavoni, S. (2005). W. Bush remaking the judiciary Like father, like son? In E. Slotnick (Ed.), Judicial politics: Readings from judicature (pp. 86-111). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
19. Gruhl, J., Spohn, C., & Welch, S. (1981). Women as policymakers: The case of trial judges. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 308-322.
20. Hartley, R., Madden, S., & Spohn, C. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407.
21. Hawkins, D. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 1, 191-215.
22. Helms, R., & Jacobs, D. (2002). The political context of sentencing: An analysis of community and individual determinants. Social Forces, 81(2), 577-604.
23. Heydebrand, W., & Seron, C. (1990). Rationalizing justice: The political economy of federal district courts. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
24. Hofer, P. J., Blackwell, K. R., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). The effect of the federal sentenc-ing guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 90(1), 239-322.
25. Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
26. Johnson, B. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(3), 761-796.
27. Johnson, B. (2006). The multilevel context of criminal sentencing: Integrating judge- and county-level influences. Criminology, 44(2), 259-298.
28. Johnson, B., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (2008). The social context of guide-lines circumvention: The case of the federal district courts. Criminology, 46(3), 737-783.
29. Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633-671.
30. Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. (2002). Crack-ing down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions between offender race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 1-35.
31. Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sample, L. L. (2001). Have the federal sentencing guidelines reduced severity? An examination of one circuit. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 17(2), 111-144.
32. Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guide-lines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 81-106.
33. Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Kritzer, H. M. (1978). Political correlates of the behavior of federal district judges: A "best case" analysis. Journal of Politics, 40, 25-58.
35. LaCasse, C., & Payne, A. A. (1999). Federal sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences: Do defendants bargain in the shadow of the judge? Journal of Law and Economics, 42, 245-269.
36. Maxfield, L. D., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). Substantial assistance: An empirical yardstick gauging equity in current federal policy and practice. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
37. Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 285-314.
38. Myers, M. A. (1988). Social background and the sentencing behavior of judges. Criminology, 26, 649-675.
39. Myers, M. A., & Talarico, S. (1987). The social contexts of criminal sentencing. New York: Springer-Verlag.
40. Nagel, I. H., & Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66, 501-566.
41. Nardulli, P. F., Eisenstein, J., & Flemming, R. B. (1988). The tenor of justice: Crimi-nal courts and the guilty plea process. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
42. Pasko, L. (2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 307-328.
43. Payne, A. A. (1997). Does inter-judge disparity really matter? An analysis of the effects of sentencing reforms in three federal district courts. International Review of Law and Economics, 17, 337-366.
44. Sabol, W. J., & McGready, J. (1999). Time served in prison by federal offenders, 1986-97: Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
45. Savelsberg, J. J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as neoclas-sical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1346-1381.
46. Schanzenbach, M. (2005). Racial and sex disparities in prison sentences: The effect of district-level judicial demographics. Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 57-92.
47. Spohn, C. (1990a). Decision making in sexual assault cases: Do black and female judges make a difference? Women & Criminal Justice, 2, 83-105.
48. Spohn, C. (1990b). The sentencing decisions of black and white judges: Expected and unexpected similarities. Law & Society Review, 24, 1197-1216.
49. Spohn, C.(2002). How do judges decide? The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Spohn, C. (2005). Sentencing decisions in three U.S. District Courts: Testing the assumption of national uniformity in the federal sentencing process. Justice Research and Policy, 7, 1-28.
51. Spohn, C., & Fornango, R. (in press). U.S. attorneys and substantial assistance departures: Testing for the inter-prosecutor disparity. Criminology.
52. Stacey, A. M., & Spohn, C.(2006). Gender and the social costs of sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. District Courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 43-76.
53. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705-729.
54. Steffensmeier, D., & Hebert, C. (1999). Women and men policymakers: Does the judge's gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants? Social Forces, 77(3), 1163-1196.
55. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-798.
56. Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Uhlman, T. M. (1978). Black elite decision making: The case of trial judges. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 884-895.
59. Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
60. Ulmer, J. T. (2005). The localized uses of federal sentencing guidelines in four U.S. District Courts: Evidence of processual order. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 255-279.
61. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137-178.
62. USGAO (United States General Accounting Office). (1992). Sentencing guidelines: Central questions remain unanswered. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.
63. USSC (United States Sentencing Commission). (1991a). The federal sentencing guidelines: A report on the operation of the guidelines system and short-term impacts on disparity in sentencing, use of incarceration, and prosecutorial discretion and plea bargaining. Washington, DC: USSC.
64. USSC. (1991b). Special report to Congress: Mandatory minimum penalties in the federal criminal justice system. Washington, DC: USSC.
65. USSC. (1993). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. St. Paul, MN: West.
66. USSC. (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: USSC.
67. USSC. (2006). 2004 Sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Washington, DC: USSC.
68. Waldfogel, J. (1991). Aggregate inter-judge disparity in federal sentencing: Evidence from three districts. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 4, 151.
69. Walker, T. G., & Barrow, D. J. (1985). The diversification of the federal bench: Policy and process ramifications. Journal of Politics, 47, 596-617.
70. Weidner, R. R., Frase, R. S., & Schultz, J. S. (2005). The impact of contextual factors on the decision to imprison in large urban jurisdictions: A multilevel analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 51(3), 400-424.
71. Welch, S., Combs, M., & Gruhl, J. (1988). Do black judges make a difference? American Journal of Political Science, 32(1), 126-136.