Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases

Justice Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 382-407

  Hartley, Richard D ^a   Maddan, Sean ^b   Spohn, Cassia C ^c  

^a TEXAS A AND M INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crack cocaine; Federal; Powder cocaine; Prosecutorial discretion; Substantial assistance departures

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547468354     PISSN: 07418825     EISSN: 17459109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07418820701485379     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Albonetti, C. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21, 291-313.
2. Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
3. Angeli, D. H. (1997). A "second look" at crack cocaine sentencing policies: One more try for federal equal protection. American Criminal Law Review, 34, 1211-1241.
4. Berman, D. A. (2005). Resources on sentencing law: Booker basics. Available online at http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/faculty/berman/booker.php
5. Britt, C. L. (2000). Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions. Justice Quarterly, 17, 707-732.
6. Caulkins, J. P., Rydell, C. P., Schwabe, W. L., & Chiesa, J. (1998). Are mandatory minimum drug sentences cost effective? Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 8-73.
7. Engen, R. L., Gainey, R. R., Crutchfield, R. D., & Weis, J. G. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 41, 99-130.
8. Feeney, F., Dill, F., & Wier, A. (1983). Arrests without conviction: How often they occur and why. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
9. Frankel, M. E. (1972a). Lawlessness in sentencing. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 41, I.
10. Frankel, M. E. (1972b). Criminal sentences: Law without order. New York: Hill & Wang.
11. Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607-628.
12. Frohmann, L. (1997). Discrediting victims allegations of sexual assault: Prosecutorial accounts of case rejections. Social Problems, 38, 213-226.
13. Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. E. 1977. Statistical methods for social scientists. Academic Press: New York.
14. Hawkins, D. F. (1981). Causal attribution and punishment for crime. Deviant Behavior, 2, 207-230.
15. Hofer, P. J., Blackwell, K. R., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). The effect of the federal sentencing guidelines on inter-judge sentencing disparity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 90, 239.
16. Jacoby, J. E., Mellon, L., Ratledge, E., & Turner, S. (1982). Prosecutorial decision making: A national study. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
17. Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-671.
18. Kautt, P. M., & Spohn, C. (2002). Cracking down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions between offender race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19, 1-36.
19. Keil, T., & Vito, G. (1989). Race, homicide, severity and application of the death penalty: A consideration of the Barnett scale. Criminology, 26, 359-371.
20. Kerstetter, W. (1990). Gateway to justice: Police and prosecutorial response to sexual assaults against women. Criminology, 81, 267-313.
21. Kingsnorth, R., Lopez, J., Wentworrth, J., & Cummings, D. (1998). Adult sexual assault: The role of racial/ethnic composition in prosecution and sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 359-371.
22. Kingsnorth, R. F., Macintosh, R. C., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Criminal charge or probation violation? Prosecutorial discretion and implications for research in criminal court processing. Criminology, 40, 553-577.
23. Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court "corrections" to Pennsylvania's sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40, 897-931.
24. LaFree, G. (1980). The effect of sexual stratification by race on official reactions to rape. American Sociological Review, 45, 842-854.
25. Langan, P. A. (1996). Sentence reductions for drug traffickers for assisting federal prosecutors. Unpublished manuscript (US Department of Justice).
26. Mather, L. (1979). Plea bargaining or trial? Lexington, MA: Heath.
27. Maxfield, L. D., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). Substantial assistance: An empirical yardstick gauging equity in current federal policy and practice. Washington, DC: United States Sentencing Commission.
28. Miller, F. (1969). Prosecution: the decision to charge a suspect with a crime. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
29. Mirande, A. (1987). Gringo justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
30. Mustard, D. B. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the US federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 1-30.
31. Myers, M. (1982). Common law in action: The prosecution of felonies and misdemeanors. Sociological Inquiry, 52, 1-15.
32. Nagel, I., & Hagan, J. (1983). Gender and crime: Offense patterns and criminal court sanctions. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds), Crime and justice: An annual review of research, vol. 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Nagel, I., & Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A tale of three cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66, 501-566.
34. Neubauer, D. (1974). After the arrest: The charging decision in prairie city. Law and Society Review, 8, 475-517.
35. Paternoster, R. (1984). Prosecutorial discretion in requesting the death penalty: A case of victim-based racial discrimination. Law and Society, 18, 437-478.
36. Paternoster, R., Brame, R. Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
37. Radelet, M., & Pierce, G. (1985). Race and prosecutorial discretion in homicide cases. Law and Society Review, 19, 587-621.
38. Rauma, D. (1984). Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321-351.
39. Ruback, R. B., & Wroblewski, J. (2001). The federal sentencing guidelines: Psychological and policy reasons for simplification. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 739-775.
40. Schmidt, J., & Steury, E. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
41. Schulhofer, S., & Nagel, I. (1989). Negotiated pleas under the federal sentencing guidelines: The first fifteen months. American Criminal Law Review, 27, 231.
42. Secunda, P. M. (1997). Cleaning up the chicken coop of sentencing uniformity: Guiding the discretion of federal prosecutors through the use of the model rules of professional conduct. American Criminal Law Review, 34, 1267.
43. Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
44. Spohn, C., Beichner, D., & Frenzel, E. (2001). Prosecutorial justifications for sexual assault case rejection: guarding the "gateway to justice." Social problems, 48, 206-235.
45. Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1987). The impact of the ethnicity and gender of defendants on the decision to reject or dismiss felony charges. Criminology, 25, 175-191.
46. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-685.
47. Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
48. Spohn, C., & Spears, J. W. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13, 649-679.
49. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in US federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
50. Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-177.
51. Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
52. Stith, K., & Cabranes, J. A. (1998). Fear of judging: Sentencing guidelines in the federal courts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
53. Swiggert, V. L., & Farrell, R. A. (1976). Murder, Inequality, and the law. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
54. Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multi-level analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
56. Ulmer, J. T., & Miller, L. L. (2002). Plea agendas in federal sentencing: Quantitative and qualitative evidence from four district courts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology in Chicago.
57. United States Sentencing Commission. (1993). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. West Group.
58. United States Sentencing Commission. (1995). Substantial assistance departures in the United States courts. Draft Final Report. Washington, DC
59. United States Sentencing Commission. (1999). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. West Group.
60. United States Sentencing Commission. (2002). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
61. United States Sentencing Commission. (2004). Fifteen years of guidelines sentencing: An assessment of how well the federal criminal justice system Is achieving the goals of sentencing reform. Washington, DC: Author.
62. United States Sentencing Commission. (2005). Special post-Booker coding project: Data extraction date August 3, 2005. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
63. US v. Booker 543 US 220 (2005).
64. Wilmot, K., & Spohn, C. (2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 324-343.
65. Zatz, M. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
66. Zatz, M. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision-making: Looking toward the 21st century. In Criminal Justice 2000. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.