Multimodal interaction with an autonomous forklift

5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 243-250

  Correa, Andrew ^a   Walter, Matthew R ^a   Fletcher, Luke ^a   Glass, Jim ^a   Teller, Seth ^a   Davis, Randall ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomous; Forklift; Interaction; Robotic; Tablet

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS; AUTONOMOUS ROBOTICS; CAMERA IMAGES; EFFECTIVE INTERACTIONS; HANDHELDS; HUMAN SUPERVISORS; KEY ELEMENTS; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; MULTIMODAL FRAMEWORKS; SKETCH INTERFACES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; MATERIALS HANDLING EQUIPMENT; ROBOTICS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 77951607291     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1734454.1734550     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. A. Adler and R. Davis. Speech and sketching: An empirical study of multimodal interaction. In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-based Interfaces and Modeling, pages 83-90, Riverside, CA, Aug. 2007.
2. J.L. Burke, R.R. Murphy, M.D. Coovert, and D.L. Riddle. Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1):85-116, June 2004.
3. R. Davis. Sketch understanding in design: Overview of work at the MIT AI Lab. In Proc. AAAI Spring Symposium on Sketch Understanding, pages 24-31, Stanford, CA, March 2002. AAAI Press.
4. J.L. Drury, J. Scholtz, and H.A. Yanco. Awareness in human-robot interactions. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), volume 1, pages 912-918, Washington, DC, October 2003.
5. F. Ferland, F. Pomerleau, C.T. Le Dinh, and F. Michaud. Egocentric and exocentric teleoperation interface using real-time, 3D video projection. In Proc. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 37-44, March 2009.
6. T. Fong, C. Thorpe, and C. Baur. Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 50(4):699-704, Aug. 2003.
7. T. Fong, C. Thorpe, and B. Glass. PdaDriver: A handheld system for remote driving. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Advanced Robotics, July 2003.
8. J.R. Glass. A probabilistic framework for segment-based speech recognition. Computer Speech and Language, 17:137-152, November 2003.
9. B. Hamilton-Baillie and P. Jones. Improving traffic behaviour and safety through urban design. Civil Engineering, 158(5):39-47, May 2005.
10. I.L. Hetherington. PocketSUMMIT: Small-footprint continuous speech recognition. In Proc. Interspeech, pages 1465-1468, Antwerp, Aug. 2007.
11. H. Holzapfel, K. Nickel, and R. Stiefelhagen. Implementation and evaluation of a constraint-based multimodal fusion system for speech and 3D pointing gestures. In Proc. International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), pages 175-182, State College, PN, October 2004.
12. M. Johnston, P.R. Cohen, D. McGee, S.L. Oviatt, J.A. Pittman, and I. Smith. Unification-based multimodal integration. In Proc. Eighth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 281-288, Morristown, NJ, 1997.
13. H. Kaymaz-Keskinpala and J.A. Adams. Objective data analysis for PDA-based human-robot interaction. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), volume 3, pages 2809-2814, The Hague, The Netherlands, October 2004.
14. H. Kaymaz-Keskinpala, J.A. Adams, and K. Kawamura. PDA-based human-robotic interface. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), volume 4, pages 3931-3936, Washington, DC, October 2003.
15. T. Matsumaru. Mobile robot with preliminary-announcement and indication function of forthcoming operation using flat-panel display. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1774-1781, 2007.
16. T. Matsumaru, K. Iwase, K. Akiyama, T. Kusada, and T. Ito. Mobile robot with eyeball expression as the preliminary-announcement and display of the robots following motion. Autonomous Robots, 18(2):231-246, 2005.
17. C.W. Nielsen, M.A. Goodrich, and R.W. Ricks. Ecological interfaces for improving mobile robot teleoperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):927-941, October 2007.
18. T.Y. Ouyang and R. Davis. Recognition of hand drawn chemical diagrams. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 846-851, 2007.
19. B. Paulson and T. Hammond. Paleosketch: Accurate primitive sketch recognition and beautification. In Proc. Int'l Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), pages 1-10, Gran Canaria, Jan. 2008.
20. D. Perzanowski, A.C. Schultz, W. Adams, E. Marsh, and M. Bugajska. Building a multimodal human-robot interface. Intelligent Systems, 16(1):16-21, Jan.-Feb. 2001.
21. D. Sakamoto, K. Honda, M. Inami, and T. Igarashi. Sketch and run: A stroke-based interface for home robots. In Proc. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 197-200, Boston, MA, April 2009.
22. M. Skubic, D. Anderson, S. Blisard, D. Perzanowski, and A. Schultz. Using a hand-drawn sketch to control a team of robots. Autonomous Robots, 22(4):399-410, May 2007.
23. S. Teller et al. A voice-commandable robotic forklift working alongside humans in minimally-prepared outdoor environments. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2010 (to appear).
24. P.R. Wurman, R. D'Andrea, and M. Mountz. Coordinating hundreds of cooperative, autonomous vehicles in warehouses. AI Magazine, 29(1):9-19, 2008. (Pubitemid 351577640)
25. B. Yu and S. Cai. A domain-independent system for sketch recognition. In GRAPHITE '03: Proc. 1st International Conference on Computer graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia, pages 141-146, New York, NY, 2003. ACM.