Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 252-256

  Iordanidou, Vasiliki ^a   Hamard, Pascale ^a   Gendron, Gael ^a,b   Labbé, Antoine ^a,c,d   Raphael, Mathilde ^e   Baudouin, Christophe ^a,c,d  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

^b BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^d INSERM   (France)

^e SAINT LOUIS HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Corneal hysteresis; Deep sclerectomy; Tonometry

Indexed keywords

ALPHA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CARBONATE DEHYDRATASE INHIBITOR; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR STIMULATING AGENT; COLLAGEN IMPLANT; PROSTAGLANDIN;

ADULT; ANALYZER; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA HYSTERESIS; CORNEA RESISTANCE FACTOR; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL COMPENSATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETRY; GOLDMANN CORRELATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCLERECTOMY; TONOMETRY; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

AGED; COLLAGEN; CORNEA; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; SCLERA; TIME FACTORS; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 77951493830     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181aff419     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:156-162.
2. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, et al. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyzer to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29:257-262.
3. Broman AT, Congdon NG, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and othe ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:581-588.
4. Ortiz D, Pinero D, Shabayek MH, et al. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33: 1371-1375.
5. Hager A, Loge K, Füllhas MO, et al. Changes in Corneal Hysteresis After Clear Corneal Cataract Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144:341-346.
6. Herndon LW. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:115-119.
7. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714-720.
8. Streho M, Dariel R, Giraud JM, et al. Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2008;31:953-960.
9. Montard R, Kopito R, Touzeau O, et al. Ocular Response Analyzer: feasibility study and correlation with normal eyes. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2007;30:978-984.
10. Hager A, Schroeder B, Sadeghi M, et al. Influence of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmologe. 2007;104:484-489.
11. Luce D, Taylor D. Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer measures corneal biomechanical properties and IOP: provides new indicators for corneal specialties and glaucoma management. Ocular Response Analyzer White Paper. Available at: http://www.ocular-responseanalyzer.com/downloads.html. Accessed on: March 2006.
12. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central Corneal Thickness and Corneal Hysteresis Associated with Glaucoma Damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:868-875.
13. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, et al. Ocular Response Analyzer versus Goldmann Applanation Tonometry for Intraocular Pressure Measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4410-4414.
14. Kirwan C, O'Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142: 990-992.
15. Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Cunliffe I, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis in normal subjects: relevance in clinical context. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34:114-118.
16. Kida T, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Effect of 24-hour corneal biomechanical changes on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4422-4426.
17. Shen M, Wang J, Qu J, et al. Diurnal variation of ocular hysteresis, corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1185-1192.
18. Baudouin C, Riancho L, Warnet JM, et al. In vitro studies of antiglaucomatous prostaglandin analogues: travoprost with and without benzalkonium chloride and preserved latanoprost. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4123-4128.
19. Baudouin C, Liang H, Hamard P, et al. The ocular surface of glaucoma patients treated over the long term expresses inflammatory markers related to both T-Helper 1 and T-Helper 2 pathways. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:109-115.
20. Viestenz A, Martus P, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, et al. Impact of prostaglandin-F (2alpha)-analogues and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors on central corneal thickness- a cross-sectional study on 403 eyes. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221:753-756.
21. Wirtitsch MG, Findl O, Heinzl H, et al. Effect of dorzolamide hydrochloride on central corneal thickness in humans with cornea guttata. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:1345-1350.
22. Ehongo A, De Maertelaer V, Pourjavan S. Effect of topical corneal anaesthesia on ocular response analyzer parameters: pilot study. Int Ophthalmol. 2008; June 11. [Epub ahead of print].
23. Touboul D, Roberts C, Kérautret J, et al. Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:616-622.
24. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts C, et al. Corneal thickness and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5337-5347.
25. Wells AP, Garway-Heath DF, Poostchi A, et al. Corneal hysteresis but not corneal thickness correlates with optic nerve surface compliance in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3262-3268.
26. Johnson CS, Mian SI, Moroi S, et al. Role of corneal elasticity in damping of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2540-2544.