Objective and subjective measures: Assessment of three measures of participation among people with spinal cord injuries

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 16-25

  Forchheimer, Martin B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

CHART SF; Community Integration Measure; ICF; PAR PRO; Participation; Quality of life; Reliability; Subjective assessment; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION MEASURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRAIG HANDICAP ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING TECHNIQUE SHORT FORM; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH PERCEPTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAR PRO MEASURE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VALIDITY;

EID: 77951453363     PISSN: 10820744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/sci1504-16     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A Manual of Classification Relating to the Consequences of Disease. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
3. Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, Clearman R, Young ME. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):552-557.
4. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2002. Chicago, IL: ASIA; 2002.
5. Steeves JD, Lammertse D, Curt A, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:206-221.
6. Keith R, Granger C, Hamilton B, Sherwin F. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg M, Grzesiak R, eds. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation. New York: Springer Publishing Co; 1987:618.
7. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Fiedler R, Granger CV, Maislin G. Functional Independence Staging: conceptual foundation, face validity, and empirical derivation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(1):29-37.
8. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-483.
9. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap - a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519-526.
10. Ostir GV, Granger CV, Black T, et al. Preliminary results for the PAR-PRO: a measure of home and community participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(8):1043-1051.
11. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11- 12):577-587.
12. Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Whiteneck G, Bogner J, Rodriguez E. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1445-1460
13. Ueda S, Okawa Y. The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: what is it and what is it for? Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11- 2):596-601.
14. Magasi SR, Heinemann AW, Whiteneck GG, Quality of Life/Participation Committee. Participation following traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(2):145-156.
15. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for postacute care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(1):5771.
16. Craig Hospital Research Department. Short- Form Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 2000.
17. McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):429-434.
18. Hall KM, Dijkers M, Whiteneck G, Brooks CA, Krause JS. The Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART): metric properties and scoring topics. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil. 1998;4(1):16-30.
19. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability - Beta-2. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
20. Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;41:71-75.
21. SPSS Statistics. Version V17.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc; 2009.
22. Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(12):936-941.
23. Cusick CP, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. The use of proxies in community integration research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(8):1018-1024.
24. Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future. In: Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin L, eds. Workshop on Disability in America, A New Look. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006:50-66.
25. Post MWM, de Witte LP, Schrijvers AJP. Quality of life and the ICIDH: towards an integrated conceptual model for rehabilitation outcomes research. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13:5-15.