Beneficial effects of resistant starch on laxation in healthy adults

International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition

Volumn 60, Issue SUPPL.4, 2009, Pages 296-305

  Maki, Kevin C ^a,b   Sanders, Lisa M ^c   Reeves, Matthew S ^a,b   Kaden, Valerie N ^a,b   Rains, Tia M ^a,b   Cartwright, Yolanda ^a,b  

^a Provident Clinical Research   (United States)

^b Provident Clinical Research   (United States)

^c Tate and Lyle Speciality Sweeteners   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Fibre; Laxation; Resistant starch

Indexed keywords

LAXATIVE; STARCH;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEFECATION; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FECES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GASTROINTESTINAL TRANSIT; HUMAN; MAIZE; MALE; METABOLISM; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DEFECATION; DIET; DIETARY FIBER; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FECES; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL FOOD; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; GASTROINTESTINAL TRANSIT; HUMANS; LAXATIVES; MALE; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEEDS; STARCH; YOUNG ADULT; ZEA MAYS;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 77951442303     PISSN: 09637486     EISSN: 14653478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09637480903130538     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aichbichler BW, Wenzl HH, Santa Ana CA, Porter JL, Schiller LR, Fordtran JS. 1998. A comparison of stool characteristics from normal and constipated people. Dig Dis Sci 43:2353-2362.
2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B 57:289-300.
3. Bird AR, Brown IL, Topping DL. 2000. Starches, resistant starches, the gut microflora and human health. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 1:25-37.
4. Birkett A, Muir J, Phillips J, Jones G, O'Dea K. 1996. Resistant starch lowers fecal concentrations of ammonia and phenols in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 63:766-772.
5. Brouns F, Arrigoni E, Langkilde AM, Verkooijen I, Fassler C, Andersson H, Kettlitz B, van Nieuwenhoven M, Philipsson H, Amado R. 2007. Physiological and metabolic properties of a digestion-resistant maltodextrin, classified as type 3 retrograded resistant starch. J Agric Food Chem 55:1574-1581.
6. Brown I,Warhurst M, Arcot J, Playne M, Illman RJ, Topping DL. 1997. Fecal numbers of bifidobacteria are higher in pigs fed Bifidobacterium longum with a high amylose cornstarch than with a low amylose cornstarch. J Nutr 127:1822-1827.
7. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. 1972. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet 30:1408-1412.
8. Cummings JH, Beatty ER, Kingman S, Bingham S, Englyst HN. 1992. Laxative effects of resistant starches. Gastroenterology 102:A548.
9. Cummings JH, Edwards C, Gee JM, Nagengast FM, Mathers JC. 1995. In: Asp NG, Van Amelsvoort JMM, Hautvast JGAJ, editors. Proceedings of the Concluding Plenary Meeting of EURESTA. Physiological effects of resistant starch in the large bowel. Den Haag, The Netherlands: CIP-data Koninklijke Bibliotheek. pp 38-55.
10. Cummings JH, Beatty ER, Kingman SM, Bingham SA, Englyst HN. 1996. Digestion and physiological properties of resistant starch in the human large bowel. Br J Nutr 75:733-747.
11. Games PA. 1977. An improved t table for simultaneous control on g contrasts. J Am Stat Assoc 72: 531-534.
12. Grabitske HA, Slavin JL. 2009. Gastrointestinal effects of low-digestible carbohydrates. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 49:327-360.
13. Haack VS, Chesters JG, Vollendorf NW, Story JA, Marlett JA. 1998. Increasing amounts of dietary fiber provided by foods normalizes physiologic response of the large bowel without altering calcium balance or fecal steroid excretion. Am J Clin Nutr 68:615-622.
14. Health Canada. 2005. Guideline Concerning the Safety and Physiological Effects of Novel Fibre Sources and Food Products Containing Them. Available at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/legislation/guide-ld/ novel-fibre-nouvelle-gui-eng. php. (Accessed 3 August, 2009).
15. Heijnen M-LA, van Amelsvoort JMM, Deurenberg P, Beynen AC. 1998. Limited effect of consumption of uncooked (RS2) or retrograded (RS3) resistant starch on putative risk factors for colon cancer in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 67:322-331.
16. Hylla S, Gostner A, Dusel G, Anger H, Bartram HP, Christl SU, Kasper H, Scheppach W. 1998. Effects of resistant starch on the colon in healthy volunteers: Possible implications for cancer prevention. Am J Clin Nutr 67:136-142.
17. Institute of Medicine. 2005. Dietary Reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids (macronutrients).Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
18. Jenkins DJ, Vuksan V, Kendall CW, Würsch P, Jeffcoat R, Waring S, Mehling CC, Vidgen E, Augustin LS, Wong E. 1998. Physiological effects of resistant starches on fecal bulk, short chain fatty acids, blood lipids and glycemic index. J Am Coll Nutr 17:609-616.
19. Jenkins DJ, Kendall CW, Vuksan V, Augustin LS, Li Y-M, Lee B, Mehling CC, Parker T, Faulkner D, Sevler H, Vidgen E, Fulgoni III V. 1999. The effect of wheat bran particle size on laxation and colonic fermentation. J Am Coll Nutr 18:339-345. (Pubitemid 29377194)
20. Muir JG, Walker KZ, Kaimakamis MA, Cameron MA, Govers MJ, Lu ZX, Young GP, O'Dea K. 1998. Modulation of fecal markers relevant to colon cancer risk: A high-starch Chinese diet did not generate expected beneficial changes relative to a Western-type diet. Am J Clin Nutr 68:372-379.
21. Noakes M, Clifton PM, Nestel PJ, Le Leu R, McIntosh G. 1996. Effect of high-amylose starch and oat bran on metabolic variables and bowel function in subjects with hypertriglyceridemia. Am J Clin Nutr 64:944- 951.
22. Nordgaard I, Mortensen PB, Langkilde AM. 1995. Small intestinal malabsorption and colonic fermentation of resistant starch and resistant peptides to short-chain fatty acids. Nutrition 11:129-137.
23. Nugent AP. 2005. Health properties of resistant starch. Nutr Bull 30:27-54.
24. Phillips J, Muir JG, Birkett A, Lu ZX, Jones GP, O'Dea K, Young GP. 1995. Effect of resistant starch on fecal bulk and fermentation-dependent events in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 62:121-130.
25. Prosky L, Asp NG, Furda I, DeVries JW, Schweizer TF, Harland BF. 1985. Determination of total dietary fiber in foods and food products: Collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68:677-679.
26. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, Paffenbarger RS, Jr. 1985. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. Am J Epidemiol 121:91-106.
27. Schneeman BO. 1999. Fiber, inulin, and oligofructose: Similarities and differences. J Nutr 129: 1424S-1427S.
28. Sharma A, Yadav BS, Ritika. 2008. Resistant starch: Physiological roles and food applications. Food Rev Int 24:193-234.
29. Shetty PS, Kurpad AV. 1986. Increasing starch intake in the human diet increases fecal bulking. Am J Clin Nutr 43:210-212.
30. Stephen AM, Cummings JH. 1980. Mechanism of action of dietary fibre in the human colon. Nature 284:283-284.
31. Storey D, Lee A, Bornet F, Brouns F. 2007. Gastrointestinal responses following acute and medium term intake of retrograded resistant maltodextrins, classified as type 3 resistant starch. Eur J Clin Nutr 61:1262-1270.
32. Tomlin J, Read NW. 1990. The effect of resistant starch on colon function in humans. Br J Nutr 64: 589-595.
33. van Munster IP, de Boer HM, Jansen MC, de Haan AF, Katan MB, van Amelsvoort JM, Nagengast FM. 1994. Effect of resistant starch on breath-hydrogen and methane excretion in healthy volunteers. Am J Clin Nutr 59:626-630.
34. Wrick KL, Robertson JB, Van Soest Pj, Lewis BA, Rivers JM, Roe DA, Hackler LR. 1983. The influence of dietary fiber source on human intestinal transit and stool output. J Nutr 113:1464-1479.