Delay, interference and bilingual development: The acquisition of verbal morphology in children learning Basque and Spanish

International Journal of Bilingualism

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 447-479

  Austin, Jennifer ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951263973     PISSN: 13670069     EISSN: 17566878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1367006909353234     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. ALDRIDGE, M. (1989). The acquisition of INFL. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications.
2. AUSTIN, J. (2007). Grammatical interference and the acquisition of ergative case in bilingual children learning Basque and Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 315-331.
3. BARREÑA, A. (1993). Haur euskaldunen hizkuntzaren jabekuntza-garapena: INFL eta KONP funtziokategorien erabileraz. Doctoral dissertation, University of the Basque Country.
4. BEL, A. (1998). Teoria lingüística i adquisició del llenguatge: Análisi comparada dels trets morfologics em catalá i en castellá. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
5. BEL, A. (2001).The projection of Aspect: A key in the acquisition of finiteness? In M. Almgren et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th conference of the international association for the study of child language. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
6. BEL, A. (2002). Early verbs in the acquisition of tense features in Spanish and Catalan. In A. Pérez- Leroux & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 1-34). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. BEL, A. (2003). The syntax of subjects in the acquisition of Spanish and Catalan. Probus, 15, 1-26.
8. BERNARDINI, P., & SCHLYTER, S. (2004). Growing syntactic structure and code-mixing in the weaker language: The Ivy Hypothesis. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(1), 49-69.
9. BLOM, E. (2003). From root infinitive to finite sentence: The acquisition of verbal inflections and auxiliaries. PhD thesis, Utrecht.
10. BLOM, E. (2007). Modality, infinitives, and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition, 14(1), 75-113.
11. BLOM, E., & WIJNEN, F. (2000). How Dutch children's root infinitives become modal. In S. Howell, S. Fish & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of BUCLD 24. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
12. BLOM, E., & WIJNEN, F. (2006). Development need not be embarrassing: The demise of the root infinitive and related changes in Dutch child language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam/Utrecht University.
13. BLUME, M. (2002). Tenseless verb forms in the acquisition of Spanish as a first language. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
14. BULLOCK, B., & TORIBIO, J. (2004). Introduction: Convergence as an emergent property in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 91-93.
15. CLAHSEN, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multi-disciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991-1060.
16. DE HOUWER, A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. DEUCHAR, M., & QUAY, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition: Theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. DÖPKE, S. (1998). Competing language structures: The acquisition of verb placement by bilingual German-English children. Journal of Child Language, 25, 555-584.
19. DÖPKE, S. (2001). On the complementarity between UG and other acquisition models. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 28-30.
20. EZEIZABARRENA, M. (1996). Adquisición de la morfología verbal en euskera y castellano por niños bilingües. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
21. EZEIZABARRENA, M. (2002). Root infinitives in two pro-drop languages. In A. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1/L2 connection (pp. 33-64). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
22. FERDINAND, A. (1996). The development of functional categories: The acquisition of the subject in French. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
23. GATHERCOLE, V. (2002). Monolingual and bilingual acquisition: Learning different treatments of that-trace phenomena. In D. K. Oller & R. Eilers (Eds.), Language and literacy in bilingual children (pp. 220-254). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
24. GATHERCOLE, V. (2007). Miami and North Wales, so far and yet so near: A constructivist account of morphosyntactic development in bilingual children. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(3), 224-247.
25. GAVRUSEVA, E. (2003). Aksionart, aspect, and the acquisition of finiteness in early child grammar. Linguistics, 41(4), 723-755.
26. GAWLITZEK-MAIWALD, I., & TRACY, R. (1996). Bilingual bootstrapping. Linguistics, 34, 901-926.
27. GENESEE, F., PARADIS, J., & CRAGO, M. (2004). Dual language development and disorders: A handbook on bilingualism and second language learning. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
28. GUASTI, M. (1992). Verb syntax in Italian child grammar. Geneva Generative Papers, 1-2, 115-122.
29. GUILFOYLE, E., & NOONAN, M. (1992). Functional categories and language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 241-272.
30. HALLE, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 30, 425-449.
31. HALLE, M., & MARANTZ, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20 (pp. 111-176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. HARLEY, H., & NOYER, R. (1999). State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International, 4(4), 3-9.
33. HARRIS, T., & WEXLER, K. (1996). The optional infinitive stage in child grammars. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 1-42). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
34. HOEKSTRA, T., & HYAMS, N. (1998). Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua, 10, 81-112.
35. HULK, A. (1997). The acquisition of French object pronouns by a Dutch/French bilingual child. In A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (Eds.), Language acquisition: Knowledge, representations and processing. Proceedings of the GALA 1997 conference on language acquisition (pp. 521-526). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
36. HULK, A., & MÜLLER, N. (2000). Crosslinguistic influence at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227-244.
37. HYAMS, N. (1994). V2, null arguments and COMP positions. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 21-56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. HYAMS, N. (1996). The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 91-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39. INGRAM, D., & THOMPSON, W. (1996). Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the modal hypothesis. Language, 72, 97-120.
40. KIPARSKY, P. (1973). 'Elsewhere' in phonology. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 93-106). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
41. KUPISCH, T. (2003). The DP, a vulnerable domain? In N. Müller (Ed.), (In) vulnerable domains in multilingualism (pp. 1-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. KUPISCH, T. (2007). Determiners in bilingual German-Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 57-78.
43. KUPISCH, T., & RINKE, E. (2007). A fresh look at root infinitives from a cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Anderssen & M. Westergaard (Eds.), Papers from the Language Acquisition Workshop SCL 2006. Tromsø: CASTL.
44. LANZA, E. (1997). Language mixing in infant bilingualism: A sociolinguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. LASSER, I. (1997). The interpretation of root infinitive constructions in adult and child German. In J. C. Schaeffer (Ed.), The interpretation of root infinitives and bare nouns (pp. 26-64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. LICERAS, J., BEL, A. & PERALES, S. (2006). 'Living with optionality': Root infinitives, bare forms and inflected forms in child null subject languages. In N. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics symposium (pp. 203-216). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
47. LICERAS, J., VALENZUELA, E., & DÍAZ, L. (1999). L1/L2 Spanish grammars and the pragmatic deficit hypothesis. Second Language Research, 15(2), 161-190.
48. MCCARTHY, C. (2006). Default morphology in second language Spanish: Missing inflection or underspecified inflection? In C. Nishida & J. Montreuil (Eds.), New perspectives on Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 35th LSRL (pp. 201-212). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
49. MEISEL, J. (1986). Word order and case marking in early child language: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages. Linguistics, 24(1), 123-183.
50. MEISEL, J. (Ed.). (1990). Two first languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
51. MEISEL, J. (Ed.). (1992). The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
52. MEISEL, J. (2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 495-514.
53. MEISEL, J., & EZEIZABARRENA, M. (1996). Subject-verb and object-verb agreement in early Basque. In H. Clausen (Ed.), Language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations, cross-linguistic comparisons (pp. 201-239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54. MONTRUL, S. (2004a). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125-142.
55. MONTRUL, S. (2004b). The acquisition of Spanish: Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. MÜLLER, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 151-171.
57. MÜLLER, N. & HULK, A. (2001). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 1-21.
58. OLLER, D. K., & EILERS, R. (2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.
59. PARADIS, J., CRAGO, M., & GENESEE, F. (2005/2006). Domain-general versus domain-specific accounts of Specific Language Impairment: Evidence from bilingual children's acquisition of object pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13(1), 33-62.
60. PARADIS, J., & GENESEE, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1-25.
61. PARADIS, J., & NAVARRO, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language, 30, 1-23.
62. PFAFF, C. (1992). The issue of grammaticalization in early German second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 273-296.
63. PHILLIPS, C. (1995). Syntax at two: Cross-linguistic differences. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger & K. Broihier (Eds.), Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 225-282.
64. PIERCE, A. (1989). On the emergence of syntax: A cross-linguistic study. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
65. PLATZACK, C. (2001). The vulnerable C-domain. Brain and Language, 77, 364-377.
66. POEPPEL, D., & WEXLER, K. (1993). The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1-33.
67. PYE, C. (1983). Mayan Telegraphese. Language, 59(3), 583-604.
68. RHEE, J., & WEXLER, K. (1995). Optional Infinitives in Hebrew. In C. Schütze, J. Ganger & K. Broihier (eds), Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 383-402.
69. RIECKBORN, S. (2006). The development of forms and functions in the acquisition of tense and aspect in German-French bilingual children. In C. Lleó (Ed.), Interfaces in multilingualism: Acquisition and representation (pp. 61-89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
70. RIZZI, L. (1994). Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra & B. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
71. SALUSTRI, M., & HYAMS, N. (2003). Is there a RI analogue in Romance languages? In B. Beachley, A. Brown & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the BUCLD 27. Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
72. SÁNCHEZ, L. (2003). Quechua-Spanish bilingualism: Interference and convergence in functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
73. SÁNCHEZ, L. (2004). Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua-Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 147-162.
74. SANO, T., & HYAMS, N. (1994). Agreement, finiteness, and the development of null arguments. Proceedings of NELS 24. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
75. SCHLYTER, S. (1993). The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viberg (Eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives (pp. 289-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. SCHLYTER, S. (1994). Early morphology in Swedish as the weaker language in French-Swedish bilingual children. Scandinavian Working Papers in Bilingualism, 1, 49-66.
77. SERRATRICE, L., SORACE, A., & PAOLI, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatic interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3), 183-205.
78. SORACE, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130-151). Oxford: Blackwell.
79. TORRENS, V. (1995). The acquisition of inflection in Spanish and Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 451-472.
80. TSIMPLI, I. (1992). Functional categories and maturation: The prefunctional stage. PhD Thesis, University College, London.
81. UNSWORTH, S. (2003). Testing Hulk & Müller 2000 on cross-linguistic influence: RIs in a bilingual German/English child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6(2), 143-158.
82. WEXLER, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement, and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305-350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. WEXLER, K. (1995). Feature interpretability and optionality in early child grammar. Paper presented at the Workshop on Optionality, University of Utrecht.
84. WEXLER, K., SCHAEFFER, J., & BOL, G. (2004). Verbal syntax and morphology in typically developing Dutch children and children with SLI: How developmental data can play an important role in morphological theory. Syntax, 7(2), 148-198.
85. WEVERINK, M. (1989). The subject in relation to inflection in child language. MA thesis, University of Utrecht.
86. WIJNEN, F. (1997). Temporal reference and eventivity in root infinitives. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 12, 1-15.
87. WIJNEN, F. (1998). The temporal interpretation of Dutch children's root infinitives: The effect of eventivity. First Language, 18, 379-402.
88. YIP, V., & MATTHEWS, S. (2000). Syntactic transfer in a Cantonese-English bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 193-208.
89. ZWANZIGER, E., ALLEN, S., & GENESEE, F. (2005). Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: Subject omission in learners of Inuktitut and English. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 893-909.