The Connectivity Paradox: Using Technology to Both Decrease and Increase Perceptions of Distance in Distributed Work Arrangements

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 85-105

  Leonardi, Paul M ^a   Treem, Jeffrey W ^a   Jackson, Michele H ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Distance; Distributed Work; Organizational Change; Telework

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951227397     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880903483599     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383-400.
2. Barley, S. R., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76-95.
3. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18(1), 93-117.
4. Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34-49.
5. Belanger, F., & Allport, C. D. (2008). Collaborative technologies in knowledge in knowledge telework: An exploratory study. Information Systems Journal, 18(1), 101-121.
6. Binder, J., Howes, A., & Sutcliffe, A. (2009). The problem of conflicting social spheres: Effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. Paper presented at the CHI, Boston, MA.
7. Boudreau, M.-C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3-18.
8. Brooks, J. (1976). Telephone: The first hundred years. New York: HarperCollins.
9. Butler, E. S., Aasheim, C., & Williams, S. (2007). Does telecommuting improve productivity? Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 101-103.
10. Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15(4), 279-306.
12. Contractor, N. S., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 143-172). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Contractor, N. S., & Seibold, D. R. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self- organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 528-563.
14. Cousins, K., & Robey, D. (2005). Human agency in a wireless world: Patterns of technology use in nomadic computing environments. Information and Organization, 15(2), 151-180.
15. Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge probelm and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346-371.
16. Daniels, K., Lamond, D., & Standen, P. (2001). Teleworking: Frameworks for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 38(8), 1151-1185.
17. DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693-703.
18. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
19. Dimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: supervision and flexibility revisited. New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 181-195.
20. Ellison, N. B. (2004). Telework and social change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Frolick, M. N., Wilkes, R. B., & Unilever, R. (1993). Telecommuting as a workplace alternative: An identification of significant factors in American firms' determination of work-at-home policies. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2(3), 206-222.
22. Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2007). Which telework? Defining and testing a taxonomy of technology-mediated work at a distance. Social Science Computer Review, 25(1), 27-47.
23. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
25. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociological Press.
26. Golden, T. (2007). Co-workers who telework and the impact on those in the office: Understanding the implications of virtual work for co-worker satisfaction and turnover intentions. Human Relations, 60(11), 1641-1667.
27. Golden, T. D. (2006). Avoiding depletion in virtual work: Telework and the intervening impact of work exhaustion on commitment and turnover intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1),176-187.
28. Golden, T. D., Veiga, J. F., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting's differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1340-1350.
29. Greenhill, A., & Wilson, M. (2006). Haven or hell? Telework, flexibility and family in the e-society: A Marxist analysis. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 379-388.
30. Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615-632.
31. Hislop, D., & Axtell, C. (2007). The neglect of spatial mobility in contemporary studies of work: the case of telework. New Technology Work and Employment, 22(1), 34-51.
32. Hylmo, A., & Buzzanell, P. (2002). Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: An empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery. Communication Monographs, 69(4),329-356.
33. Jessup, L. M., & Robey, D. (2002). The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environments. Communications of the ACM, 45(12), 88-91.
34. Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? In P. J. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Leonardi, P. M. (2007). Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organization Science, 18(5), 813-831.
37. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). The mutual constitution of technology and organizing across development and use activities. Communication Theory, 19, 277-309.
38. Leonardi, P. M., Jackson, M. H., & Marsh, N. N. (2004). The strategic use of "distance" among virtual team members: A multi-dimensional communication model. In S. Godar & S. P. Ferris (Eds.), Virtual and collaborative teams: Process, technologies, and practice (pp. 156-172). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
39. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Marsh, K., & Musson, G. (2008). Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework. Gender Work and Organization, 15(1), 31-48.
41. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Nilles, J. M. (1975). Telecommunications and organizational decentralization. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23, 1142-1147.
43. O'Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433-452.
44. O'Mahony, S., & Barley, S. R. (1999). Do telecommunications technologies affect work and organizations? The state of our knowledge. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, (vol. 21, pp. 125-161). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
45. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139-178.
46. Olson, J. S., Covi, L., Rocco, E., Miller, W. J., & Allie, P. (1998). A room of your own: What would it take to help remote groups work as well as collocated groups? Proceedings of the CHI'98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 279-280.
47. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428.
48. Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2),145-165.
49. Rice, R. E., & Gattiker, U. (2001). New media and organizational structuring. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 544-581). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Tan, D., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., & Pausch, R. (2006). Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction (ToCHI), 13(1), 71-99.
52. Vaast, E., & Walsham, G. (2005). Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization, 15(1), 65-89.
53. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual commu- nity. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
54. WorldatWork (2009). WorldatWork telework trendlines 2009. Retrieved September 29, 2009, from http://www.worldatwork.org/waw/adimLink?id31115