The Subjective Index for Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) in Stroke: Investigation of its subscale structure

BMC Neurology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Kersten, Paula ^a   Ashburn, Ann ^a   George, Steve ^b   Low, Joseph ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTEGRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RASCH ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STROKE; SUBJECTIVE INDEX OF PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FITNESS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN RELATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICAL FITNESS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; STROKE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951216473     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-10-26     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mant J, Wade DT, Winner S. Health Care Needs Assessment: Stroke. Health care needs assessment: the epidemiologically based needs assessment reviews. 2007, Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, Stevens A, Raftery J, Mant J, Simpson S.
2. National Audit Office Reducing Brain Damage: Faster access to better stroke care. 2005, London: National Audit Office, National Audit Office.
3. Department of Health National Stroke Strategy. London 2007, Department of Health.
4. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party National clinical guideline for stroke. 2008, London: Royal College of Physicians, Third, Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party.
5. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999, 30:2131-40.
6. Trigg R, Wood VA, Hewer RL. Social reintegration after stroke: The first stages in the development of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil 1999, 13:341-53. 10.1191/026921599676390259, 10460122.
7. Kersten P, George S, Low J, Ashburn A, McLellan L. The subjective index of physical and social outcome: Its usefulness in a younger stroke population. Int J Rehabil Res 2004, 27:59-63. 10.1097/00004356-200403000-00008, 15097171.
8. Trigg R, Wood VA. The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO): A new measure for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil 2000, 14:288-99. 10.1191/026921500678119607, 10868724.
9. Trigg R, Wood VA. The validation of the subjective index of physical and social outcome (SIPSO). Clin Rehabil 2003, 17:283-9. 10.1191/0269215503cr609oa, 12735535.
10. Geyh S, Cieza A, Kollerits B, Grimby G, Stucki G. Content comparison of health-related quality of life measures used in stroke based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2007, 16:833-51. 10.1007/s11136-007-9174-8, 17294283.
11. Kersten P, Low JTS, Ashburn A, George SL, McLellan DL. The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: Results of a national UK survey. Disabil Rehabil 2002, 24:860-6. 10.1080/09638280210142167, 12450462.
12. Low JTS, Kersten P, Ashburn A, George S, McLellan DL. A study to evaluate the met and unmet needs of members belonging to young stroke groups affiliated with the stroke association. Disabil Rehabil 2003, 25:1052-6. 10.1080/0963828031000069753, 12944160.
13. Harrington R, Taylor G, Hollinghurst S, Reed M, Kay H, Wood VA. A community-based exercise and education scheme for stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation. Clin Rehabil 2010, 24:3-15. 10.1177/0269215509347437, 20026571.
14. Lord S, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008, 22:215-25. 10.1177/0269215507081922, 18285431.
15. Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2001, 144-6. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. 1960, Copenhagen: Danish Institution for Educational Research.
17. Horn JL. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica 1965, 30:179-85.
18. Mokken RJ. The theory and procedure of scale analysis with applications in political research. 1971, New York, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, Mouton.
19. Mokken RJ, Lewis C. A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Appl Psychol Meas 1982, 6:417-30.
20. Molenaar IW. A weighted Loevinger H-coefficient extending Mokken scaling to multicategory items. Kwantitatieve Methoden 1988, 9:115-26.
21. van Shuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric Item response theory. Political Analysis 2003, 11:139-63.
22. Andrich D. Rasch models for measurement series: quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 68. 1988, London: Sage Publications.
23. Tennant A, Conaghan PG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?. Arthritis Care Res 2007, 57:1358-62.
24. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. 1979, Chicago: Mesa press.
25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995, 310:170. 2548561, 7833759.
26. SPSS Inc SPSS 15.0 for Windows. Release 15.0.1 2007, SPSS Inc.
27. StataCorp Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. 2007, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, StataCorp.
28. Andrich D, lyne A, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM 2020. 2003, Perth: RUMM Laboratory.
29. Fisher W. Reliability Statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1992, 6:238.
30. Perline R, Wright BD, Wainer H. The Rasch model as additive conjoint measurement. Appl Psychol Meas 1979, 3:237-56.
31. Rasch G. On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1980, 321-34. IV. Berkeley: University of Chicago Press.
32. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999, 30:1362-9.
33. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, Di Guiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, et al. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002, 324:1183-5. 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183, 111107, 12016181.
34. Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. 1992, London: Continuum, 2.
35. Bowling A. Research methods in health. Investigating health and health services 1997, Buckingham: Open University Press.
36. Healthcare Commission Survey of patients 2006. Caring for people after they have had a stroke. A follow-up survey of patients. Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection 2006, Healthcare Commission.
37. Department of Health Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. 2005, London, Department of Health, 2, Department of Health.