Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design

Dental Materials

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 533-538

  Clausen, Jan Ole ^a   Abou Tara, Milia ^a   Kern, Matthias ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

All ceramic; Fatigue; Fracture resistance; Full coverage molar restoration

Indexed keywords

ALL-CERAMIC; CLINICAL APPLICATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; COVERAGE RESTORATION; DYNAMIC FATIGUE; FATIGUE; FATIGUE FRACTURE RESISTANCE; FINISHING LINES; FOUR-GROUP; FRACTURE RESISTANCE; LITHIUM DISILICATE; LITHIUM DISILICATE GLASS; PREPARATION DESIGN; REINFORCED GLASS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINES;

CERAMIC MATERIALS; DESIGN; ENAMELS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TESTING; GLASS; LITHIUM; MASTICATION; RESINS; SECONDARY BATTERIES; SWITCHING SYSTEMS; UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SYSTEMS;

RESTORATION;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; GLASS; IPS E.MAX PRESS; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LEUCITE; LITHIA DISILICATE; OPTIBOND FL; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK; WATER;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BITE FORCE; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH PREPARATION; WATER;

EID: 77951205060     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kelly J.R. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 652-661
2. Rosenblum M.A., and Schulman A. A review all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 128 (1997) 297-307
3. Van Dijken J.W. All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20 (1999) 1115-1124
4. Felden A., Schmalz G., Federlin M., and Hiller K.A. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 2 (1998) 161-167
5. El-Mowafy O., and Brochu J.F. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations - a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 68 (2002) 233-237
6. Kramer N., and Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 262-271
7. Otto T., and De Nisco S. Computer-manufactured, direct ceramic restorations: a prospective, clinical 10-year study of Cerec CAD-CAM inlays and onlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 113 (2003) 156-169
8. Attia A., and Kern M. Influence of cyclic loading and luting agents on the fracture load of two all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 92 (2004) 551-566
9. Heintze S.D., Cavalleri A., Zellweger G., Buchler A., and Zappini G. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols. Dent Mater 24 (2008) 1352-1361
10. Stappert C.F., Att W., Gerds T., and Strub J.R. Fracture resistance of different partial-coverage ceramic molar restorations: an in vitro investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 137 (2006) 514-522
11. Stoll R., Sieweke M., Pieper K., Stachniss V., and Schulte A. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns. A retrospective study at a dental school clinic. Clin Oral Investig 3 (1999) 100-104
12. Malament K.A., and Socransky S.S. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 511-519
13. Mota C.S., Demarco F.F., Camacho G.B., and Powers J.M. Tensile bond strength of four resin luting agents bonded to bovine enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 558-564
14. Piemjai M., and Arksornnukit M. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems. J Prosthodont 16 (2007) 457-464
15. Bates J.F., Stafford G.D., and Harrison A. Masticatory function - a review of the literature. III. Masticatory performance and efficiency. J Oral Rehabil 3 (1976) 57-67
16. Steiner M., Mitsias M.E., Ludwig K., and Kern M. In vitro evaluation of a mechanical testing chewing simulator. Dent Mater 25 (2009) 494-499
17. Kern M., Fechtig T., and Strub J.R. Influence of water storage and thermal cycling on the fracture strength of all-porcelain, resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 71 (1994) 251-256
18. Stappert C.F., Abe P., Kurths V., Gerds T., and Strub J.R. Masticatory fatigue, fracture resistance, and marginal discrepancy of ceramic partial crowns with and without coverage of compromised cusps. J Adhes Dent 10 (2008) 41-48
19. Kern M., Strub J.R., and Lü X.-Y. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 26 (1999) 372-378
20. Körber K.H., and Ludwig K. Maximale Kaukraft als Berechnungsfaktor zahntechnischer Konstruktionen. Dent Labor 31 (1983) 55-60
21. DeLong R., and Douglas W.H. Development of an artificial oral environment for testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 62 (1983) 32-36
22. Dietschi D., Maeder M., Meyer J.M., and Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 21 (1990) 823-831