A localist-cum-distributed (LCD) framework for lexical processing

From Inkmarks to Ideas: Current Issues in Lexical Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 76-94

  Taft, Marcus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951150789     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203841211     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1052-1086.
3. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch:Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
4. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homophony, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 489-511.
5. Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes are functional units of reading. Memory and Cognition, 18, 419-427.
6. Burani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2, 217-227.
7. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud:Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
9. Coltheart, V., Patterson, K., & Leahy, J. (1994). When a ROWS is a ROSE: Phonological effects in written word comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 917-955.
10. Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition:True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
11. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
12. Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactiveactivation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Kay, J., & Marcel, A. J. (1981). One process, not two, in reading aloud: Lexical analogies do the work of nonlexical rules. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 397-414.
14. McCann, R. S., Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1988). Word recognition and identification:Do word-frequency effects reflect lexical access? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 693-706.
15. Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
16. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
17. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537.
18. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
20. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
21. Shallice, T., & McCarthy, R. (1985). Phonological reading: From patterns of impairment to possible procedures. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
22. Shallice, T., Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111-138.
23. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street:Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
24. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
25. Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Memory and Cognition, 10, 465-474.
26. Taft, M. (1986). Lexical access codes in visual and auditory word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 49-60.
27. Taft, M. (1987). Morphographic processing: The BOSS re-emerges. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII. Hove, UK Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
28. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
29. Taft, M. (1992). The body of the BOSS: Subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1004-1014.
30. Taft, M. (2001). Processing of orthographic structure by adults of different reading ability. Language and Speech, 44, 351-376.
31. Taft, M. (2002). Orthographic processing of polysyllabic words by native and non-native English speakers. Brain and Language, 81, 532-544.
32. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words. Amsterdam:Kluwer.
33. Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 745-765.
34. Taft, M., & Ardasinski, S. (in press). Obligatory decomposition in reading prefixed words. The Mental Lexicon.
35. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
36. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
37. Taft, M., & Kougious, P. (2004). The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words. Brain and Language, 90, 9-16.
38. Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
39. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
40. Treiman, R. (1983). The structure of spoken syllables: Evidence from novel word games. Cognition, 15, 49-74.
41. Treiman, R. (1986). The division between onsets and rimes in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 476-491.
42. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset-and rime-like units in printed words? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
43. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
44. Unsworth, S. J., & Pexman, P. M. (2003). The impact of reader skill on phonological processing in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 63-81.
45. Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition, 15, 181-198.