Advancing global capacity for engineering education research AGCEER: Relating research to practice policy and industry

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 107-119

  Jesiek, Brent K ^a   Borrego, Maura ^b   Beddoes, Kacey ^c  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Engineering Education 0218   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH; ENGINEERING TEACHINGS; GLOBAL CAPACITY; GLOBAL CONTEXT; INTERACTIVE SESSION; INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION; SESSION ATTENDEES; THEMATIC ANALYSIS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 77951150383     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01048.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abbott, A. 1981. Status and status strain in the professions. American Journal of Sociology 864 815-835
2. Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Annals of Research on Engineering EducationAREE). 2010. http://www.areeonline.org/last accessed, November 2009).
4. Australasian Association for Engineering Education. 2008. ERMEducational Research and Methods). AAEE Newsletter March 2008. http://www.aaee.com.au/ newsletters/Newsletter%20March%202008-files/index.htmllast accessed, November 2009).
5. Ball, D.L. 2003. Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
6. Becher, T. 1994. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 192 151-161 (Pubitemid 24795860)
7. Biesta, G. 2007. Bridging the gap between educational research and educational practice: The need for critical distance. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice 133 295-301.
8. Biglan, A. 1973. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 573 195-203.
9. Blume, S.S. 1985. After the darkest hour - Integrity and engagement in the development of university research. In The university research system: The public policies of the home of scientists5th ed.), eds. B. Wittrock and A. Elzinga, 139-165. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
10. Borrego, M. 2007. Conceptual difficulties experienced by engineering faculty becoming engineering education researchers. Journal of Engineering Education 962 91-102.
11. Borrego, M., K. Beddoes, and B.K. Jesiek. 2009. International perspectives on the need for interdisciplinary expertise in engineering education scholarship. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering EducationAAEE) Annual Conference. Adelaide, Australia.
12. Borrego, M., B.K. Jesiek, and K. Beddoes. 2008. Advancing global capacity for engineering education research: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the Frontiers in EducationFIE) 2008 Conference. Saratoga Springs, NY.
13. Borrego, M., R. Streveler, R.L. Miller, and K. A. Smith. 2008. A new paradigm for a new field: Communicating representations of engineering education research. Journal of Engineering Education 972 147-162 (Pubitemid 351667495)
14. Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Boyer, E.L. 1990. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
16. Bremer, D. 2008. Engineering the world. Online Journal of Global Engineering Education 32 13-18. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/ vol3/ iss2/2/last accessed, November 2009).
17. Burkhardt, H., and A. Schoenfeld. 2003. Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher 329 3-14. (Pubitemid 38184423)
18. European Commission. 2009. Evidence-based policy and practice: Call for proposals to develop networks of knowledge brokerage initiativesCall for proposals-EAC/26/2009). http://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/ calls/2609/call-en.pdflast accessed, August 2009).
19. Feldman, A., and J. Minstrell. 2000. Action research as a research methodology for the study of the teaching and learning of science. In Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, eds. A.E.Kelly and R.A. Lesh, 429-456. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Fensham, P.J. 2004. Defining an identity: The evolution of science education as a field of research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Grandin, J.M., and E.D. Hirleman. 2009. Educating engineers as global citizens: A call for action/A report of the national summit meeting on the globalization of engineering education. Online Journal of Global Engineering Education 41 10-25. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/ vol4/iss1/1/last accessed, November 2009).
22. Hakala, J. 1998. Internationalization of science: Views of the scientific elite in Finland. Science Studies 111 52-74.
23. Hutchings, P., and L.S. Shulman. 1999. The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change 315 10-15.
24. Jesiek, B.K., M. Borrego, and K. Beddoes. 2009. Mapping local trajectories of engineering education research to catalyze cross-national collaborations. Paper presented at the SEFI Annual Conference 2009. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
25. Jesiek, B.K., L.K. Newswander, and M. Borrego. 2009. Engineering education research: Field, community, or discipline? Journal of Engineering Education 981 39-52.
26. Knight J. 2005. An internationalization model: Responding to new realities and challenges. In Higher education in Latin America, eds. H. de Wit, C. Jaramillo, J. Gacel-Ávila and J. Knight, 1-38. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
27. Latour, B. 1988. The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Lemaine, G., R. Macleod, M. Mulkay, and P. Weingart. 1976. Introducti on: Problems in the emergence of new disciplines. In Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines, eds. G. Lemaine, R. Macleod, M. Mulkay, and P. Weingart, 1-23. Mouton, France: Parex.
29. Lohmann, J.R. 2008. Editor's page: A growing global footprint. Journal of Engineering Education 97(4 393-394
30. Lohmann, J.R. 2010. Editor's page. A global community: Year fiveand beyond. Journal of Engineering Education 992 97-102.
31. Lohmann, J.R., and E. de Graaff. 2008. Advancing the global capacity for engineering education researchAGCEER A year of international dialogue. Paper presente d at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
32. McGrath, J.E., and I. Altman. 1966. Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
33. National Research Council. 2007. Science and security in a post 9/11 world: A report based on regional discussions between the science and security communities. Committee on a New Government-University Partnership for Science and Security. Committee on Science, Technology, and Law. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
34. National Research Council. 2008. International collaborations in behavioral and social sciences: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
35. National Science Foundation. 2007. Course, curriculum, and laboratory improvementCCLI)No.NSF 07-543). Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf. gov/pubs/2007/nsf07543/nsf07543.htmlast accessed, November 2009).
36. Patton, M.Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
37. Rogers, E.M. 1995, 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
38. Seely, B. 1993. Research, engineering, and science in American engineering colleges: 1900-1960. Technology as Culture 342 344-386
39. Seely, B. 1999. The other re-engineering of engineering education: 1960-1965. Journal of Engineering Education 883 285-294
40. SEFI. 2008. Engineering education research. http://www.sefi.be/index.php? page-id=1192last accessed, December 2008).
41. Shaffer, D., and K. Squire. 2006. The Pasteurization of education. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences.Bloomington, IN.
42. Smith, K. 2008. Implications of research in engineering education for practice in engineering education. Paper presented at the 7th ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education. Cape Town, South Africa.
43. Stokes, D. 1997. Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institutions Press.
44. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory2nd ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Streveler, R.A., M. Borrego, and K.A. Smith. 2007. Moving from the 'scholarship of teaching and learning' to 'educational research': An example from engineering. In To improve the academyVol. 25), eds. D.R. Robertson and L.B. Nilson, 139-149. Boston, MA: Anker.
46. Stromquist, N.P. 2007. Internationalization as a response to globalization: Radical shifts in university environments. Higher Education 531 81-105.
47. Wæver, O. 1998. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization 524 687-727.
48. Weinstein, M. 2006. TAMS Analyzer: Anthropology as cultural critique in a digital age. Social Science Computer Review 241 68-77. (Pubitemid 43170685)