Roll- and pitch-plane-coupled hydro-pneumatic suspension. Part 2: Dynamic response analyses

Vehicle System Dynamics

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 507-528

  Cao, Dongpu ^a   Rakheja, Subhash ^b   Su, Chun Yi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anti pitch; Anti roll; Handling; Interconnected suspension; Nonlinear vehicle model; Ride

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; DESIGN FLEXIBILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS; ENERGY SAVING; HYDRO-PNEUMATIC SUSPENSION; INTERCONNECTED SUSPENSIONS; PASSIVE SUSPENSION; PERFORMANCE BENEFITS; PERFORMANCE POTENTIALS; RIDE AND HANDLING; ROAD EXCITATIONS; SUSPENSION PROPERTIES; UNCONNECTED SUSPENSION; VEHICLE MODEL; VEHICLE RIDE;

AUTOMOBILE PARTS AND EQUIPMENT; AUTOMOBILE SUSPENSIONS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ENERGY CONSERVATION; INTERCONNECTION NETWORKS; PNEUMATIC CONTROL; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); VEHICLES;

SUSPENSIONS (COMPONENTS);

EID: 77951138918     PISSN: 00423114     EISSN: 17445159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00423110902923461     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. X. Kang, S. Rakheja, and I. Stiharu, Effects of tank shape on the roll dynamic response of a partly filled tank vehicle, Vehicle System Dynamics 35 (2001), pp. 75-102.
2. D.J. Cole, Fundamental issues in suspension design for heavy road vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics 35 (2001), pp. 319-360.
3. E. Dahlberg, Yaw instability due to longitudinal load transfer during braking in a curve, SAE paper 1999-2001- 2952, 1999.
4. J.Y.Wong, Theory of Ground Vehicles 3rd ed.,Wiley, NewYork, USA.
5. R.S. Sharp,Vehicle dynamics and the judgment of quality, in Vehicle Performance, J.P. Pauwelussen, ed., Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, the Netherlands, pp. 87-96.
6. D. Cao, S. Rakheja, and C.-Y. Su, Heavy vehicle pitch dynamics and suspension tuning. Part I: Unconnected suspension, Vehicle System Dynamics 46 (2008), pp. 931-953.
7. R.A.Williams, Automotive active suspensions. Part 2: practical considerations, J. Automobile Eng. 211 (1997), pp. 427-444.
8. R. Rajamani, Vehicle Dynamics and Control, Springer, NY, USA.
9. D. Cao, S. Rakheja, and C.-Y. Su, Roll- and pitch-plane coupled hydro-pneumatic suspension. Part 1: Feasibility analysis and suspension properties, Vehicle System Dynamics, accepted.
10. S. Hegazy, H. Rahnejat, and K. Hussain, Multi-body dynamics in full-vehicle handling analysis under transient manoeuver, Vehicle System Dynamics 34 (2000), pp. 1-34.
11. A.R. Savkoor, H. Happel, and F. Horkay, Vehicle handling and sensitivity in transient manoeuvres, in Vehicle Performance, J.P. Pauwelussen, ed., Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, the Netherlands, pp. 121-147.
12. M. El-Gindy and J.Y.Wong, A comparison of various computer simulation models for predicting the directional responses of articulated vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics 16 (1987), pp. 249-268.
13. R.D. Ervin, The dependence of truck roll stability on size and weight variables, Int. J. Vehicle Des. 7 (1986), pp. 192-208.
14. D. Cebon, Handbook of Vehicle-road Interaction, Swets & Zeitlinger, the Netherlands.
15. E. Giangiulio, 14 d.o.f. VERTEC vehicle model VDSIM - Vehicle Dynamic SIMulator Implementation and validation, 3rd International Colloquium on Vehicle-Tyre-Road Interaction, Stuttgart, Germany.
16. T. Shim and C. Ghike, Understanding the limitations of different vehicle models for roll dynamics studies, Vehicle System Dynamics 45 (2007), pp. 191-216.
17. D.J. Cole, Evaluation of design alternatives for roll-control of road vehicles, Proceedings of AVEC 2000, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
18. D.J.M. Sampson and D. Cebon, Active roll control of single unit heavy road vehicles,Vehicle System Dynamics 40 (2003), pp. 229-270.
19. M.V. Blundell, The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 3: tyre modelling, J.Multi-Body Dynam. 214 (2000), pp. 1-32.
20. H.B. Pacejka, Tire and Vehicle Dynamics, SAE Inc, PA, USA, 2002.
21. D. Cao, S. Rakheja, and C.-Y. Su, A generalized model of a class of interconnected hydro-pneumatic suspensions and analysis of pitch properties, Proceedings of ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Chicago, IMECE2006-13961, USA.
22. J.E. Bernard, C.B. Winkler, and P.S. Fancher, A computer based mathematical method for predicting the directional response of trucks and tractor-trailers, The University of Michigan, UMTRI Technical Report UM-HSRI-PF-73-81, USA.
23. J. Klasson, A generalized crosswind model for vehicle simulation purposes, Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 37 (2002), pp. 350-359.
24. E. Bakker, L. Byborg, and H.B. Pacejka, Tyre modeling for use in vehicle dynamic studies, SAE paper 870421.
25. H.B. Pacejka and E. Bakker, The magic formula tyre model, Proceedings of 1st Tyre Colloquium, Delft, The Netherlands.
26. R.W.Murphy, J.E. Bernard, and C.B.Winkler,A computer based mathematical method for predicting the braking performance of trucks and tractor-trailers, UMTRI Report UM-HSRI-PF-72-81, The University of Michigan, USA.
27. P.S. Fancher, Generic data for representing truck tire characteristics in simulations of braking and braking-ina- turn maneuvers, UMTRI Report 95-134, The University of Michigan, USA.
28. P.S. Fancher, R.D. Ervin, C.B. Winkler, and T.D. Gillespie, A factbook of the mechanical properties of the components for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks, UMTRI Report UMTRI-86-112, The University of Michigan, USA.
29. C.B. Winkler, J.E. Bernard, P.S. Fancher, C.C. Macadam, and T.M. Post, Predicting the braking performance of trucks and tractor-trailers, UMTRI Report UM-HSRI-76-26-31, The University of Michigan, USA.
30. M.-W. Suh, Y.-K. Park, S.-J. Kwon, S.-H. Yang, and B.-C. Park, A simulation program for the braking characteristics of tractor-semitrailer vehicle, SAE paper 2000-2001-3415.
31. T. Kaneko, I. Kageyama, and H. Tsunashima, Braking stability of articulated vehicles on highway, Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 37 (2002), pp. 1-11.
32. D. Cao, S. Rakheja, and C.-Y. Su, Dynamic analyses of heavy vehicle with pitch-interconnected suspensions, Int. J. Heavy Vehicle Systems 15 (2008), pp. 272-308.
33. J.C. Dixon, Tires, Suspension and Handling 2nd ed., SAE Inc, PA, USA.
34. R.S. Sharp, Influence of suspension kinematics on pitching dynamics of cars in longitudinal maneuvering, Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 33 (1999), pp. 23-36.
35. E.P. Timoney and S.S. Timoney, A review of the development of independent suspension for heavy vehicles, SAE paper 2003-2101-3433.
36. S. Rakheja, Z.Wang, and A.K.W. Ahmed, Urban bus optimal passive suspension study. Phase II: Enhancement of road- and driver-friendliness of urban buses through optimal suspension damping, Transportation Canada Report T-8200-4-4556, Canada.
37. T.D. Gillespie, Heavy truck ride, SAE paper 850001.
38. ISO 2631-2641, Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration-Part 1: general requirements, International Organization of Standardization, 1997.