Behavioral consequences of plant invasion: An invasive plant alters rodent antipredator behavior

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 556-561

  Mattos, Kaitlin J ^a   Orrock, John L ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Antipredator behavior; Foraging; Giving up densities; Invasive species; Rodent

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DECIDUOUS FOREST; FOOD PREFERENCE; INVASIVE SPECIES; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; RODENT; SHRUB; TROPHIC LEVEL;

MISSOURI; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALIA; CARYA; LONICERA; LONICERA MAACKII; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS LEUCOPUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 77951104742     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq020     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allan BF, Keesing F, Ostfeld RS. 2003. Effect of forest fragmentation on Lyme disease risk. Cons Biol. 17:267-272. (Pubitemid 36234419)
2. Bartuszevige AM, Gorchov DL. 2006. Avian seed dispersal of an invasive shrub. Biol Invasions. 8:1013-1022.
3. Blumstein DT, Daniel JC. 2005. The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands. Proc Royal Soc B. 272:1663-1668.
4. Brown JS. 1988. Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, pre-dation risk, and competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 22:37-47.
5. Brown JS, Kotler BP. 2004. Hazardous duty pay and the foraging cost of predation. Ecol Lett. 7:999-1014.
6. Caro TM. 2005. Antipredator defenses in birds and mammals: interspecific interactions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
7. Chaneton EJ, Bonsall MB. 2000. Enemy-mediated apparent competition: empirical patterns and the evidence. Oikos. 88:380-394. (Pubitemid 30118978)
8. Collier MH, Vankat JL, Hughes MR. 2002. Diminished plant richness and abundance below Lonicera maackii, an invasive shrub. Am Mid Nat. 147:60-71.
9. Connell JH. 1990. Apparent versus "real" competition in plant communities. In: Grace JB, Tilman D, editors. Perspectives on plant competition. New York: Academic Press.
10. Gorchov DL, Trisel DE. 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol. 166:13-24.
11. Gordon DR. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol Appl. 8:975-989.
12. Gould AM, Gorchov DL. 2000. Effects of the exotic invasive shrub Lonicera maackii on the survival and fecundity of three species of native annuals. Am Mid Nat. 144:36-50.
13. Hartman KM, McCarthy BC. 2007. A dendro-ecological study of forest overstorey productivity following the invasion of the non-indigenous shrub Lonicera maackii. Appl Veg Sci. 10:3-14.
14. Holt RD, Kotler BP. 1987. Short-term apparent competition. Am Nat. 130:412-430.
15. Hutchinson TF, Vankat JL. 1997. Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Cons Biol. 11:1117-1124.
16. Jones CG, Ostfeld RS, Richard MP, Schauber EM, Wolff JO. 1998. Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science. 279:1023-1026.
17. Kotler BP, Brown JS, Hasson O. 1991. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology. 72:2249-2260.
18. Lackey JA, Huckaby DG, Ormiston BG. 1985. Peromyscus leucopus. Mamm Species. 247:1-10.
19. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD. 1996. SAS system for mixed models. Cary (NC): SAS Institute.
20. Longland WS. 1994. Effects of artificial bush canopies and illumination on seed patch selection by Heteromyid rodents. Am Mid Nat. 132:82-90.
21. Loria R, Scharf I, Subach A, Ovadia O. 2008. The interplay between foraging mode, habitat structure, and predator presence in an-tlions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:1185-1192.
22. Mandelik Y, Jones M, Dayan T. 2003. Structurally complex habitat and sensory adaptations mediate the behavioural responses of a desert rodent to an indirect cue for increased predation risk. Evol Ecol Res. 5:501-515. (Pubitemid 38681676)
23. Manson RH, Ostfeld RS, Canham CD. 2001. Long-term effects of rodent herbivores on tree invasion dynamics along forest-field edges. Ecology. 82:3320-3329.
24. Manson RH, Stiles EW. 1998. Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields. Oikos. 82: 37-50. (Pubitemid 28244429)
25. Matlack RS, Kaufman DW, Kaufman GA. 2008. Influence of woody vegetation on small mammals in tallgrass prairie. Am Mid Nat. 160:7-19.
26. McCormick JT, Meiners SJ. 2000. Season and distance from forest: old field edge affect seed predation by white-footed mice. Northeast Nat. 7:7-16.
27. McEvoy NL, Durtsche RD. 2004. Effect of the invasive shrub Lonicera maackii (Caprifoliaceae; Amur honeysuckle) on autumn herpetofau-na biodiversity. J Kentucky Acad Sci. 65:27-32.
28. McKinney AM, Goodell K. 2010. Shading by invasive shrub reduces seed production and pollinator services in a native herb. Biol Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-009-9680-4
29. M#Closkey RT, Lajoie DT. 1975. Determinants of local distribution and abundance in white-footed mice. Ecology. 56:467-472.
30. McShea WJ. 2000. The influence of acorn crops on annual variation in rodent and bird populations. Ecology. 81:228-238.
31. Meiners SJ. 2007. Apparent competition: an impact of exotic shrub invasion on tree regeneration. Biol Invasions. 9:849-855.
32. Miller KE, Gorchov DL. 2004. The invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, reduces growth and fecundity of perennial forest herbs. Oecologia. 139:359-375.
33. Morris DW, Davidson DL. 2000. Optimally foraging mice match patch use with habitat differences in fitness. Ecology. 81:2061-2066.
34. Orrock JL, Danielson BJ. 2004. Rodents balancing a variety of risks: invasive fire ants and indirect and direct indicators of predation risk. Oecologia. 140:662-667.
35. Orrock JL, Danielson BJ. 2009. Temperature and cloud cover, but not predator urine, affect winter foraging of mice. Ethology. 115: 641-648.
36. Orrock JL, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff RJ. 2004. Rodent foraging is affected by indirect, but not by direct, cues of predation risk. Behav Ecol. 15:433-437.
37. Orrock JL, Holt RD, Baskett M. 2010. Refuge-mediated apparent competition in plant-consumer interactions. Ecol Lett. 13:11-20.
38. Orrock JL, Witter MS, Reichman OJ. 2008. Apparent competition with an exotic plant reduces native plant establishment. Ecology. 89: 1168-1174.
39. Ostfeld RS, Jones CG, Wolff JO. 1996. Of mice and mast. Bioscience. 46:323-330.
40. Preisser EL, Bolnick DI, Benar MF. 2005. Scared to death? The effects of intimidation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ecology. 86:501-509.
41. Rodewald AD, Shustack DP, Hitchcock LE. 2010. Exotic shrubs as ephemeral ecological traps for nesting birds. Biol Invasions. 12: 33-39.
42. Schmidt KA, Whelan CJ. 1999. Effects of exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on songbird nest predation. Cons Biol. 13:1502-1506.
43. Sih A, Bolnick B, Luttbeg B, Orrock JL, Peacor SC, Pintor M, Preisser E, Rehage JS, Vonesh JR. 2010. Predator-prey naivete, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18039.x.
44. Snyder WE, Evans EW. 2006. Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Ann Review Ecol Evol and Syst. 37: 95-122.
45. Stankowich T, Blumstein DT. 2005. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc Royal Soc B. 272:2627-2634. (Pubitemid 41796567)
46. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP. 2006. Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett. 9:354-371.
47. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stage of invasion. New Phytol. 176:256-273.
48. Veech JA. 2001. The foraging behavior of granivorous rodents and short-term apparent competition among seeds. Behav Ecol. 12: 467-474.
49. Verdolin JL. 2006. Meta-analysis of foraging and predation risk tradeoffs in terrestrial systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 60:457-464.
50. Vitousek PM. 1986. Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA, Drake JA, editors. Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Ecological Studies. Vol.58. New York: Springer-Verlag.
51. Werner EE, Peacor SD. 2003. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology. 84:1083-1100.
52. White JA, Geluso K. 2007. Seasonal differences in onset of surface activity of Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). J Mammal. 88: 234-240. (Pubitemid 46363967)
53. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 1998. Threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience. 48:607-615.
54. Williams CE, Ralley JJ, Taylor DH. 1992. Consumption of seeds of the invasive Amur honeysuckle Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim., by small mammals. Nat Areas J. 12:86-89.
55. Wolf M, Batzli G. 2004. Forest edge: high or low quality habitat for white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus)? Ecology. 85:756-769. (Pubitemid 38398288)