Preferences for different questions when testing hypotheses in an abstract task: Positivity does play a role, asymmetry does not

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 162-174

  Cherubini, Paolo ^a   Rusconi, Patrice ^a   Russo, Selena ^b   Di Bari, Selenia ^a   Sacchi, Simona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Hypothesis testing; Information selection; Probabilistic reasoning

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951022558     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Baron J., Beattie J., Hershey J.C. Heuristics and biases in diagnostic reasoning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1988, 42:88-110.
2. Beyth-Marom R., Fischhoff B. Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983, 45(6):1185-1195.
3. Cameron J.A., Trope Y. Stereotype-biased search and processing of information about group members. Social Cognition 2004, 22(6):650-672.
4. Cheng P.W., Holyoak K.J. Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology 1985, 17:391-416.
5. Cherubini P., Castelvecchio E., Cherubini A.M. Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: An information theory approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2005, 58:309-332.
6. Crupi V., Tentori K., Gonzalez M. On Bayesian theories of evidential support: Normative and descriptive considerations. Philosophy of Science 2007, 74:229-252.
7. Doherty M.E., Mynatt C.R., Tweney R.D., Schiavo M.D. Pseudodiagnosticity. Acta Psychologica 1979, 43:111-121.
8. Doherty, M. E., & Mynatt, C. R. (1986). The magical number one. In D. Moates & R. Butrick (Eds.), Inference Ohio University Interdisciplinary Conference 86 (Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Conference on Inference; pp. 221-230). Athens: Ohio University.
9. Evans J.St.B.T. Matching bias in conditional reasoning: Do we understand it after 25 years?. Thinking and Reasoning 1998, 4:45-82.
10. Fiedler K. Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling theory of judgments biases. Psychological Review 2000, 107:659-676.
11. Fiedler K., Brinkmann B., Betsch T., Wild B. A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond base rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2000, 129:399-418.
12. Fischhoff B., Beyth-Marom R. Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review 1983, 90(3):239-260.
13. Gale M., Ball L.J. Dual-goal facilitation in Wason's 2-4-6 task: What mediates successful rule discovery?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:873-885.
14. Garcia-Marques L., Sherman S.J., Palma-Oliveira J.M. Hypothesis testing and the perception of diagnosticity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 37:183-200.
15. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive thought 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
16. Good I.J. Probability and the weighing of evidence 1950, Charles Griffin & Company, London.
17. Good I.J. Weight of evidence, corroboration, explanatory power, information and the utility of experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 1960, 22:319-331.
18. Good I.J. Good thinking: The foundations of probability and its applications 1983, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
19. Hammond K.R. Beyond rationality: The search for wisdom in a troubled time 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
20. Henrion M., Fischhoff B. Assessing uncertainty in physical constants. American Journal of Physics 1986, 54:791-798.
21. Jones M., Sugden R. Positive confirmation bias in the acquisition of information. Theory and Decision 2001, 50:59-99.
22. Kareev Y., Halberstadt N., Shafir D. Improving performance and increasing the use of non-positive testing in a rule-discovery task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1993, 46A:729-742.
23. Klayman J. Varieties of confirmation bias. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 1995, 32:385-418.
24. Klayman J., Ha Y.-W. Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review 1987, 94(2):211-228.
25. Klayman J., Ha Y.W. Hypothesis testing in rule discovery: Strategy, structure, and content. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1989, 15:596-604.
26. Koehler D.J. The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1993, 56:28-55.
27. Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37(11):2098-2109.
28. Mandel D.R., Lehman D.R. Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998, 127:269-285.
29. McDonald J. Is strong inference superior to simple inference?. Syntheses 1992, 92:261-282.
30. McKenzie C.R.M. Hypothesis testing and evaluation. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2004, 200-219. Blackwell, London. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
31. Newman J., Wolff W.T., Hearst E.J. The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1980, 6:630-650.
32. Nickerson R.S. Hempel's paradox and Wason's selection task: Logical and psychological puzzles of confirmation. Thinking and Reasoning 1996, 2:1-31.
33. Nickerson R.S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 1998, 2:175-220.
34. Nisbett R.E., Ross L.D. Human inference. Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment 1980, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
35. Oaksford M., Chater N. A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review 1994, 101:608-631.
36. Oaksford M., Chater N. Optimal data selection: Revision, review, and re-evaluation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2003, 10:289-318.
37. Oaksford M., Chater N. Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
38. Osteyee D.B., Good I.J. Information, weight of evidence, the singularity between probability measures and signal detection, lecture notes in mathematics 1974, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York.
39. Poletiek F.H., Berndsen M.T. Hypothesis testing as risk behaviour with regard to beliefs. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making 2000, 13:107-123.
40. Poses R.M., Bekes C., Copare F.J., Scott W.E. What difference do two days make? The inertia of physicians' sequential prognostic judgments for critically ill patients. Medical Decision Making 1990, 10:6-14.
41. Ross L., Anderson C. Shortcomings in the attribution process: On the origins and maintenance of erroneous social assessments. Judgement under uncertainty: Heursitics and biases 1982, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, P. Slovic (Eds.).
42. Rossi S., Caverni J.P., Girotto V. Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery problem: When a focused procedure is effective. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2001, 54:263-267.
43. Skov R.B., Sherman S.J. Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 22:93-121.
44. Slowiaczek L.M., Klayman J., Sherman S.J., Skov R.B. Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: What is a good question, and what is a good answer?. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:392-405.
45. Snyder M., Swann W.B. Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1978, 36(11):1202-1212.
46. Spellman B.A., Lopez A., Smith E.E. Hypothesis testing: Strategy selection for generalising versus limiting hypotheses. Thinking and Reasoning 1999, 5:67-91.
47. Sperber D., Cara F., Girotto V. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 1995, 57:31-95.
48. Trope Y., Bassok M. Confirmatory and diagnosing strategies in social information gathering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982, 43(1):22-34.
49. Trope Y., Thompson E.P. Looking for truth in all the wrong places? Asymmetric search of individuating information about stereotyped group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73(2):229-241.
50. Vallée-Tourangeau F., Austin N.G., Ramkin S. Inducing a rule in Wason's 2-4-6 task: A test of the information-quantity and goal-complementarity hypotheses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1995, 48A:895-914.
51. Villejoubert G., Mandel D.R. The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes's theorem and the additivity principle. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:171-178.
52. Wason P.C. On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1960, 12:129-140.
53. Wason P.C. Reasoning. New horizons in psychology I 1966, Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK. B.M. Foss (Ed.).
54. Wason P.C. Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 20:273-281.
55. Zuckerman M., Knee C.R., Hodgins H.S., Miyake K. Hypothesis confirmation: The joint effect of positive test strategy and acquiescence response set. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995, 68:52-60.