The effect of message frame in anti-smoking public service announcements on cognitive response and attitude toward smoking

Health Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 11-21

  Shen, Lijiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PASSIVE SMOKING; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; SMOKING; TOBACCO SMOKE POLLUTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950976972     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410230903473490     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arpan, L., Rhodes, N., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2007). Attitude accessibility: Theory, methods, and future directions. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. L. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (pp. 351-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Biener, L. (2000). Adult and youth response to the Massachusetts antitobacco television campaign. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 6, 40-44.
3. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Health, United States, 2004.
4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269-277.
6. Dillard, J. P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and structure of affect. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 309-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2001). Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. Human Communication Research, 27, 38-68.
8. Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasion. Communication Monographs, 72, 144-168.
9. Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1996). Framing social reality: The relevance of relational judgments. Communication Research, 23, 703-723.
10. Farrelly, M. C., Niederdeppe, J., & Yarsevich, J. (2003). Youth tobacco prevention mass media campaigns: Past, present, and future directions. Tobacco Control, 12(Suppl. I), i35-i47.
11. Farrelly, M. C., Healton, C. G., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C., & Haviland, M. L. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 901-907.
12. Fishbein, M., & Cappella, J. (2006). The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication, 56, S1-S17.
13. Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication Theory, 13, 164-183.
14. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Goldman, L. K., & Glantz, S. A. (1998). Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of American Medical Association, 279, 772-777.
16. Grandpre, J., Alvario, E., Burgoon, M., Miller, C., & Hall, J. (2003). Adolescence reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication, 15, 349-366.
17. Hersey, J. C., Niederdeppe, J., Evans, W. D., Nonnemaker, J., Blahut, S., Farrelley, M. C., Holden, D., Messeri, P., & Haviland, M. L. (2005). The theory of "truth": How counterindustry media campaigns affect smoking behavior among teens. Health Psychology, 24, 22-31.
18. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski, (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
19. Hornik, R. (Ed.). (2002). Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Morgan, S., Palmgreen, P., Stephension, M., Hoyle, R., & Lorch, E. (2003). Association between message features and subjective evaluation of the sensation value of anti-drug public service announcements. Journal of Communication, 53, 512-526.
21. Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30, 224-247.
22. Niederdeppe, J. (2005). Syntactic indeterminacy, perceived message sensation value-enhancing features, and message processing in the context of anti-tobacco advertisements. Communication Monographs, 72, 324-344.
23. Niederdeppe, J., Farrelly, M. C., & Haviland, M. L. (2004). Confirming "truth": More evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 255-257.
24. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2005). Framing and the understanding of citizenship. In S. Dunwoody, L. B. Becker, G. M. Kosicki, & D. McLeod (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts (pp. 167-207) Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
25. Pechmann, C., & Knight, S. J. (2002). An experimental investigation of the joint effects of advertising and peers on adolescents' beliefs and intentions about cigarette consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 5-19.
26. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). New values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication science (pp. 173-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
28. Rhodes, N., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Hull, C. A., & Monahan, J. L. (2007). Anti-smoking PSAs: Message themes and smoking functions. Poster presentation, National Conference on Tobacco and Health.
29. Samp, J. A., & Solomon, D. H. (2005). Toward a theoretical account of goals in message features. Communication Monographs, 72, 22-45.
30. Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O'Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061-1086.
31. Sly, D. F., Trapido, E., & Ray, S. (2002). Evidence of the dose effects of antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Preventive Medicine, 35, 511-518.
32. Terry-Mcelrath, Y., Wakefield, M., Ruel, E., Balch, G. I., Emery, S., Sczcypka, G., Glegg-Smith, K., & Flay, B. (2005). The effect of antismoking advertisement executional characteristics on youth comprehension, appraisal, recall, and engagement. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 127-143.
33. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
34. Wakefield, M., Flay, B., Nichter, M., & Giovino, G. (2003). Effects of anti-smoking advertising on youth smoking: A review. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 229-247.
35. Wechsler, H., Rigotti, N. A., Gledhill-Hoyt, J., & Lee, H. (1998). Increased levels of cigarette use among college students: A cause for national concern. Journal of American Medical Association, 18, 1673-1678.