On making infrastructure visible: Putting the non-humans to rights

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 77-89

  Pinch, Trevor ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Infrastructure; Non humans; Ontology; Sociology; Technology

Indexed keywords

INFRASTRUCTURE; POLITICS; SOCIALISM;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 77950924860     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bep044     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ashmore, M. 1993. Behaviour modification of a catflap: a contribution to the sociology of things, Kennis en Methode, vol. 17, 214-29.
2. Akrich, M. 1992. The description of technical objects, pp. 202-25 in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
3. Bijker, W. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
4. Bijker, W.E. and Bijsterveld, K. 2000. Women walking through plans: technology, democracy, and gender identity, Technology and Culture, vol. 41, no. 3, 485-515.
5. Bijker, W., Hughes, T., and Pinch, T. (eds), 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
6. Bloor, D. 1999. Anti-Latour, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 30A, 81-112.
7. Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
8. Callon, M. and Latour, B. 1992. Don't throw the baby out with the bath school! A reply to Collins and Yearley, pp. 343-68 in Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practices and Culture, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
9. Collins, H. 1992. [1985]. Changing Order, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
10. Collins, H.M. and Yearley, S. 1992. Epistemological chicken, pp. 301-26 in Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practices and Culture, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press.
11. David, S. and Pinch, T. 2008. Six degrees of reputation: the uses and abuses of on-line reputation systems, pp. 341-73 in Pinch, T. and Swedberg, R. (eds), Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
12. Edgerton, D. 2006. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900, London, Profile Books.
13. Faulkner, P. and Runde, J. 2009. On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function, Academy of Management Review, vol. 34, no. 3, 442-462.
14. Haraway, D. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People and Significant Otherness, Chicago, Prickly Paradigm Press.
15. Kline, R. and Pinch, T. 1996. Users as agents of technological change: the social construction of the automobile in the rural United States, Technology and Culture, vol. 37, 763-95.
16. Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
17. Latour, B. 1992. Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts, pp. 225-58 in Bijker, W. and Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
18. Latour, B. 1999. For David Bloor....and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor's "Anti-Latour", Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 30A, 113-129.
19. MacKenzie, D. 1993. Inventing Accuracy, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
20. Madzini, R. 2009. Bareket: There is a Solution to the Secular-Ultra religious struggle over Eruv, YNET online newspaper, 7 May, available at http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/1,7340, L-3712622,00.html [date last accessed 29 June 2009], in Hebrew.
21. Mumford, L. 1934. Technics and Civilization, New York, Harcourt Brace and Co.
22. Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. 2003. How Users Matter, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
23. Pinch, T.J. 1986. Confronting Nature: The Sociology of Solar-Neutrino Detection, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer.
24. Pinch, T. and Bijker, W. 1984. The social construction of facts and artifacts, Social Studies of Science, vol. 14, 399-441.
25. Pinch, T. and Trocco, F. 2002. Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
26. Pinkney, D.H. 1958. Napoleon III and the Rebuilding of Paris, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
27. Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality, New York, Free Press.
28. Star, S.L. 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 43, 377-91.
29. Verbeek, P.-P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency and Design, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press.
30. von Hippel, E. 1988. The Sources of Innovation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
31. Winner, L. 1999. Do artifacts have politics? in MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (eds), The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia and Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
32. Woodruff, A., Augustin, S. and Foucault, B. 2007. Sabbath Day Home Automation: 'It's Like Mixing Technology and Religion', pp. 527-36 in Proceedings of the ACM CHI 07 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, San Jose, April 28-May 3, 2007.
33. Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials, in Law, J. (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London, Routledge.