On the identity of technological objects and user innovations in function

Academy of Management Review

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 442-462

  Faulkner, Philip ^a   Runde, Jochen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67249119841     PISSN: 03637425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2009.40632318     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Adamson, R. 1952. Functional fixedness as related to problem solving: A repetition of three experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44: 288-291.
2. Akrich, M. 1992. The de-scription of technological objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change: 205-224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Archer, M. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Baldwin, C, Hienerth, C, & von Hippel, E. 2006. How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35: 12911313.
5. Bhaskar, R. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Press.
6. Bhaskar, R. 1989. Reclaiming reality: Critical introduction to contemporary philosophy. London: Verso.
7. Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of bicycles, bakelite, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). 1987. The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. (Translated by R. Nice.) Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Brewster, B., & Broughton, F. 1999. Last night a DJ saved my life: The history of the disc jockey. London: Headline Book.
11. Cage, J. 1939. Imaginary landscape no. 1 (musical composition for two variable-speed phono turntables, frequency recordings, muted piano, and cymbal). Edition Peters 6716©1960. New York: Henmar Press.
12. CBS News. 2004. Turntablism 101: The turntable as an instrument. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/25/sunday/ main808774.shtml, March 28.
13. Chang, J. 2005. Can't stop won't stop: A history of the hip-hop generation. London: Edbury Press.
14. Cohen, M. D., & Bacdayan, P. 1994. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. Organization Science, 5: 554-568.
15. Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., & Winter, S. 1996. Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653-698.
16. David, P. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75: 332-337.
17. Demby, E. 2003. Learn to turntable. Washingtonpost.com. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A408782003JuIl0?, July 13.
18. Faraone, C. 2007. Grandmaster class, http://www.berklee.edu/ news/2007/11/grandmasteT-flash.html, November 1.
19. Feldman, M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11: 611-629.
20. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94-118.
21. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. 2005. Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14: 793-815.
22. Fotion, N. 2000. John Searle. London: Acumen Press.
23. Franke, N., & Shah, S. 2003. How communities support inno-vative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end users. Research Policy, 32: 157-178.
24. Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. 2006. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23: 301-315.
25. German, T., & Barrett, H. 2005. Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16: 1-5.
26. Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. Hacking, I. 2002. Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Hargadon, A. B., & Douglas, Y. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 475-501.
29. Hayes, R. 2004. Berklee turns tables on music education: Hiphop-inspired turntable course is another Berklee first. http://www.berklee.edu/opi/2004/ 0217Jitml, February 17.
30. Hienerth, C. 2006. The commercialization of user-innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management, 36: 273-294.
31. Hodgkinson, T. 1987. Pierre Schaeffer: An interview with the pioneer of musique concrète. Recommended Records Quarterly Magazine, 2(1): 4-9.
32. Hodgson, G. M. 2008. The concept of a routine. In M. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organization routines: 15-28. Cheltenham, UK & Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
33. Jam, B. Undated. Creator of the scratch: Grand Wizard Theodore. Hip hop slam, http://www.hiphopslam.com/ articles/int-grandwizardtheo.html.
34. Kitwana, B. 2002. The hip hop generation: Young blacks and the crisis in African-American culture. New York: BasicCivitas Books.
35. Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. 2002. The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27: 28-52.
36. Kline, R., & Pinch, T. 1996. Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37: 763-795.
37. Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. 2006. The dual nature of technical artefacts. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37: 1-4.
38. Lawson, T. 1997. Economics and reality. London: Routledge.
39. Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.
40. Lawson, C. 2008. An ontology of technology: Artefacts, relations and functions. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. 12: 48-64.
41. Lazaric, N. 2000. The role of routines, rules and habits in collective learning: Some epistemological and ontological considerations. European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, 14: 157-171.
42. Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Lüthje, C. 2003. Customers as co-inventors: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of customer-driven innovations in the field of medical equipment. Proceedings of the 32nd EMAC Conference, Glasgow.
44. Lüthje, C, Herstatt, C, & von Hippel, E. 2005. User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking. Research Policy, 34: 951-965.
45. Malone, M. 2005. DJ Grand Wizard Theodore interview, http:/1 www.ukhh.com, December 14.
46. Meijers, A. 2000. The relational ontology of technical artifacts. In P. Kroes & A. Meijers (Eds.), The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology: 81-96. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
47. Mitcham, C. 1994. Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Morrison, P., Roberts, J., & Midgley, D. 2004. The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status. Research Policy, 33: 351-362.
49. Murph, J. 2006. Spinning a new song: DJ Logic goes legit with the turntables. Downbeat, 73(11): 38-40.
50. Muther, C. 2004. Berklee professor takes DJ class out for a spin. Boston Globe, February 17.
51. Newman, M. 2003. Pedestrian: History of turntablism. http:// www.pedestrian.info/PedestrianHistoryofTurntablism.pdf.
52. Nightingale, P. 2003. If Nelson and Winter are only half right about tacit knowledge, which half? A Searlean critique of "codification." Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 149-183.
53. Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. 2003. How users matter: The coconstruction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Panasonic. Undated. Introduction to the SL-DZ1200. http:// www.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/technics-dj/ prod-intro-sldzl200.asp.
55. Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. 1987. The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: 17-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Pinch, T., & Troceo, F. 2002. AnaJog days: The invention and impact of the Moog synthesizer. Boston: Harvard University Press.
57. Rose, T. 1994. Black music: Rap music and black culture in contemporary America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
58. Runde, J. 2002. Filling in the background. Journal of Economic Methodology, 9: 11-30.
59. Runde, J., Jones, M., Munir, K., & Nikolychuk, L. 2009. On technological objects and the adoption of technological product innovations: Rules, routines and the transition from analogue photography to digital imaging. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 1-24.
60. Russell, S. 1986. The social construction of artefacts: A response to Pinch and Bijker. Social Studies of Science, 16: 331-346.
61. Saddler, J. Undated. Videoclip declaration prior to entering website, http://www.grandmasterilash.com/.
62. Schelling, T. C. 1960. The strategy of conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Schloss, J. G. 2004. Making beats: The art of sample-based hip-hop. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
64. Searle, J. R. 1995. The construction of social reality. Middlesex: Allen Lane, Penguin Press.
65. Searle, J. R. 1999. Mind, language and society. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
66. Searle, J. R. 2001. Rationality in action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Shah, S. K. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52: 1000-1014.
68. Sherwin, A. 2007. Guitar sales boom means hip-hop has had its day. Times Online, http://www.timesonline.co.uk/ article/0,2-2547585.html.
69. Small, M. Undated. Faculty profile: Stephen Webber's long and winding road, http://www.berklee.edu/bt/153/ bb-iaculty-profile.html.
70. Souvignier, T. 2003. The world of DJs and the turntable culture. Milwaukee: Hal Leonard Corporation.
71. Sudnow, D. 2001. Ways of the hand: A rewritten account. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
72. Tietz, R., Morrison, P. D., Lüthje, C, & Herstatt, C. 2005. The process of user-innovation: A case study on user innovation in a consumer goods setting. International JournaJ of Product Development, 2: 321-338.
73. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
74. von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Wansink, B., & Gilmore, J. 1999. New uses that revitalize old brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2): 90-98.
76. Webber, S. 2003. TurntabJe technique: The art of the DJ. Boston: Berklee Press.
77. White, M. 1996. The phonograph turntable and performance practice in hip hop music. Ethnomusicology OnLine, http://www.research.umbc.edU/eol/2/ white/index.html.
78. Wilder, E. 2006. Endtroducing... New York: Continuum International.
79. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. (Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe.) Oxford: Blackwell.
80. Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: 57-99. London: Routledge.