A spatial model incorporating dynamic, endogenous network interdependence: A political science application

Statistical Methodology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 406-428

  Hays, Jude C ^a   Kachi, Aya ^a   Franzese Jr , Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdependence; Network dependence; Spatial econometrics; Spatial lag

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950916309     PISSN: 15723127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2009.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. M. Allers, J.P. Elhorst, Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands, University of Groningen, 2005, unpublished manuscript
2. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models (1988), Kluwer Academic, Boston
3. Anselin L. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26 2 (2003) 153-166
4. Basinger S., and Hallerberg M. Remodeling the competition for capital: How domestic politics erases the race to the bottom. American Political Science Review 98 2 (2004) 261-276
5. Beck N., Gleditsch K.S., and Beardsley K. Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50 (2006) 27-44
6. A. Bhattacharjee, C. Jensen-Butler, Estimation of spatial weights matrix, with an application to diffusion in housing demand, School of Economics and Finance, University of St. Andrews, UK, 2006. http://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/crieff/papers/dp0519.pdf
7. Boots B., and Dufournaud C. A programming approach to minimizing and maximizing spatial autocorrelation statistics. Geographical Analysis 26 (1994) 54-66
8. Brueckner J.K., and Saavedra L.A. Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition?. National Tax Journal 54 2 (2001) 203-229
9. Cameron D. The expansion of the public economy: A comparative analysis. American Political Science Review 72 4 (1978) 1243-1261
10. Case A.C., Rosen H.S., and Hines J.R. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: Evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics 52 3 (1993) 285-307
11. Chen X., and Conley T. A new semiparametric spatial model for panel time series. Journal of Econometrics 105 1 (2001) 59-83
12. Conley T. GMM estimation with cross-sectional dependence. Journal of Econometrics 92 1 (1999) 1-45
13. Elhorst J.P. Dynamic models in space and time. Geographical Analysis 33 (2001) 119-140
14. Elhorst J.P. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review 26 (2003) 244-268
15. Elhorst J.P. Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geographical Analysis 37 (2005) 85-106
16. E. Fernandez-Vazquez, J. Rodriguez-Valez, Taking off some hoods: Estimating spatial models with a non-arbitary W matrix, Paper Presented at the 2007 Meeting of the Spatial Econometric Association, 2007. http://fp.paceprojects.f9.co.uk/Vazquez.pdf
17. R. Franzese, J. Hays, Empirical modeling strategies for spatial interdependence: Omitted-variable vs. simultaneity biases, Presented at the 21st Summer Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, 2004
18. R. Franzese, J. Hays, Spatiotemporal models for political-science panel and time-series-cross-section data, Presented at the Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, 2006
19. Franzese R., and Hays J. Strategic interaction among EU governments in active-labor-market policymaking: Subsidiarity and policy coordination under the European employment strategy. European Union Politics 7 2 (2006) 167-189
20. Franzese R., and Hays J. Empirical models of international capital-tax competition. In: Gregoriou G., and Read C. (Eds). International Taxation Handbook (2007), Elsevier Press 43-72
21. Franzese R., and Hays J. Spatial-econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political-science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis 15 2 (2007) 140-164
22. Franzese R., and Hays J. Empirical models of spatial interdependence. In: Box-Steffensmeier J., Brady H., and Collier D. (Eds). Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (2008), Oxford UP, Oxford 570-604
23. Franzese R., and Hays J. Interdependence in comparative politics: Theoretical- & empirical-model specification, estimation, interpretation, and presentation. Comparative Political Studies 41 4-5 (2008) 742-780
24. R. Franzese, J. Hays, Spatial Econometric Models of Interdependence, Book manuscript, 2008
25. R. Franzese, J. Hays, A comparison of the small-sample properties of several estimators for spatial-lag count-models, Presented at the Summer Meeting of the Political Methodology Society, 2009
26. R. Franzese, J. Hays, The spatial probit model of interdependent binary outcomes: Estimation, interpretation, and presentation, Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, 2009
27. Fredriksson P.G., and Millimet D.L. Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across US states. Journal of Urban Economics 51 1 (2002) 101-122
28. Garrett G. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy (1998), Cambridge UP, New York
29. Getis A., and Aldstadt J. Constructing the spatial weights matrix using a local statistic. Geographical Analysis 36 2 (2004) 90-104
30. Getis A., and Aldstadt J. Using AMOEBA to create a spatial weights matrix and identify spatial clusters. Geographical Analysis 38 4 (2006) 327-343
31. Getis A., and Griffith D. Comparative spatial filtering in regression analysis. Geographical Analysis 34 (2002) 130-140
32. Grenander U. Abstract Inference (1981), Wiley Series, New York
33. Griffith D.A. Some guidelines for specifying the geographic weight matrix contained in spatial statistical models. In: Arlinghaus S.L. (Ed). Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics (1996), CRC, Boca Raton 65-82
34. Griffith D. Spatial Autocorrelation and Spatial Filtering: Gaining Understanding through Theory and Scientific Visualization (2003), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
35. Griffith D.A. Assessing spatial dependence in count data: Winsorized and spatial filter specification alternatives to the auto-Poisson model. Geographical Analysis 38 2 (2006) 160-179
36. J. Hays, Bucking the system: Using simulation methods to estimate and analyze systems of equations with qualitative and limited dependent variables, Paper given at the St. Louis Area Methods Meeting, SLAMM, Washington University in St. Louis, 2009. http://slamm.wustl.edu
37. Hays J. Globalization and the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism (2009), Oxford UP, Oxford
38. Hays J., Ehrlich S., and Peinhardt C. Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization 59 2 (2005) 473-494
39. J. Hays, A. Kachi, Estimating interdependent duration models with an application to government formation and survival, Paper Given at the Political Methodology Society Summer Meeting, 2008. http://polmeth.wustl.edu/conferences/methods2008/program.html
40. Heckman J.J. Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica 46 4 (1978) 931-959
41. Hoff P.D., Raftery A.E., and Handcock M.S. Latent space approaches to social network analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97 460 (2002) 1090-1099
42. Hoff P.D., and Ward M.D. Modeling dependencies in international relations networks. Political Analysis 12 2 (2004) 160-175
43. P.D. Hoff, A. Westveld, A bayesian mixed effects model for longitudinal social network data, University of Washington, 2007 (unpublished)
44. Iversen T., and Cusack T.R. The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization?. World Politics 52 3 (2000) 313-349
45. Katzenstein P. Small States in World Markets (1985), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
46. Kitschelt H. The Transformation of European Social Democracy (1994), Cambridge UP
47. Kooijman S. Some remarks on the statistical analysis of grids especially with respect to ecology. Annals of Systems Research 5 (1976)
48. Leenders, T.A.J. Roger, Structure and influence, Dissertation, ICS/University of Groningen, ISBN 90-5170-329-5, 1995
49. Leenders, and Roger T.A.J. Longitudinal behavior of network structures and actor attributes: Modeling interdependence of contagion and selection. In: Doreian P., and Stokman F. (Eds). Evolution of Social Networks (1997), Routledge, Amsterdam 165-184
50. LeSage J.P., and Pace R. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics (2009), CRC Press
51. Meen G. Spatial aggregation, spatial dependence and predictability in the UK housing market. Housing Studies 11 3 (1996) 345-372
52. Openshaw S. Optimal zoning systems for spatial interaction models. Environment and Planning A 9 (1977) 169-184
53. Ord J.K., and Getis A. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: Distributional issues and an application. Geographical Analysis 27 (1995) 286-306
54. Overman H.G., and Puga D. Regional unemployment clusters: Nearness matters within and across Europe's borders. Economic Policy 17 34 (2002) 117-147
55. Pinkse J., Slade M.E., and Brett C. Spatial price competition: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 70 3 (2002) 1111-1153
56. T. Plümper, E. Neumayer, Model specification in the analysis of spatial dependence, SSRN Working Paper #1092113, 2008
57. M. Redoano, Fiscal interactions among European countries, Warwick Economic Research Papers No. 680, 2003
58. Rodrik D. Has Globalization Gone Too Far? (1997), Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
59. Ruggie J.G. International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization 36 2 (1982) 195-231
60. Smith T.E. Estimation bias in spatial models with strongly connected weight matrices. Geographical Analysis 41 (2009) 307-332
61. Snijders T.A.B. Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. In: Doreian P., and Stokman F. (Eds). Evolution of Social Networks (1997), Routledge, Amsterdam 185-208
62. Snijders T.A.B. The Statistical Evaluation of Social Network Dynamics. In: Sobel M.E., and Becker M.P. (Eds). Sociological Methodology vol. 31 (2001) 361-395
63. Snijders T.A.B. Models for longitudinal network data. In: Carrington P., Scott J., and Wasserman S. (Eds). Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis (2005), Cambridge UP, New York (Chapter 11)
64. Snijders T.A.B., and Borgatti S.P. Non-parametric standard errors and tests for network statistics. Connections 22 2 (1999) 161-170
65. T.A.B. Snijders, C. Steglich, P. West, Applying SIENA: An illustrative analysis of the co-evolution of adolescents' friendship networks, taste in music, and alcohol consumption, 2006
66. Snijders T.A.B., Steglich C., and Schweinberger M. Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In: van Montfort K., Oud H., and Satorra A. (Eds). Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 41-71 (Chapter 3)
67. Swank D. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States (2002), Cambridge UP, Cambridge