Empirical Models of Spatial Inter-Dependence

The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Franzese, Robert J ^a   Hays, Jude C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

OLS; Political science; SAR model; Spatial error models; Spatial interdependence; Spatial lag models; Spatio temporal autoregressive model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924037439     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0025     Document Type: Chapter

References (131)

1. ANSELIN, L. 1980. Estimation methods for spatial autoregressive structures. Regional Science Dissertation and Monograph Series, Cornell University.
2. ANSELIN, L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
3. ANSELIN, L. 1992. Space and applied econometrics: introduction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22: 307-16.
4. ANSELIN, L. 1995. Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27: 93-115.
5. ANSELIN, L. 2001. Spatial econometrics. Pp. 310-30 in A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics, ed. B. Baltagi. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. ANSELIN, L. 2002. Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricultural Economics, 27: 247-67.
7. ANSELIN, L. 2003. Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review, 26: 153-66.
8. ANSELIN, L. 2006. Spatial econometrics. Pp. 901-41 in Palgrave Handbook of Econometrics, i: Econometric Theory, ed. T. C. Mills and K. Patterson. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. ANSELIN, L., BERA, A., FLORAX, R. J., and YOON, M. 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26: 77-104.
10. BAILEY, M., and ROM, M. 2004. A wider raceó Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics, 66: 326-47.
11. BALLA, S. 2001. Interstate professional associations and the diffusion of policy innovations. American Politics Research, 29: 221-45.
12. BASINGER, S., and HALLERBERG, M. 2004. Remodeling the competition for capital: how domestic politics erases the race-to-the-bottom. American Political Science Review, 98: 261-76.
13. BECK, N., GLEDITSCH, K. S., and BEARDSLEY, K. 2006. Space is more than geography: using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly, 50: 27-44.
14. BECK, N., and KATZ, J. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time series cross section data in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 89: 634-47.
15. BECK, N., KATZ, J. 1996. Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time series cross section models. Political Analysis, 6: 1-34.
16. BECK, P., DALTON, R., GREENE, S., and HUCKFELDT, R. 2002. The social calculus of voting: interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices. American Political Science Review, 96: 57-74.
17. BERON, K. J., MURDOCH, J. C., and VIJVERBERG, W. P. 2003. Why cooperateó Public goods, economic power, and the Montreal Protocol. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85: 286-97.
18. BERRY, F. S. 1994. Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22: 442-56
19. BERRY, F. S., and BERRY, W. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84: 395-415.
20. BERRY, F. S., and BERRY, W. 1999. Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. P. Sabatier. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
21. BERRY, W. D., FORDING, R. C., and HANSON, R. L. 2003. Reassessing the "race to the bottom" in state welfare policy. Journal of Politics, 65: 327-49.
22. BESAG, J. 1974. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36: 192-225.
23. BOEHMKE, F., and WITMER, R. 2004. Disentangling diffusion: the effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Political Research Quarterly, 57: 39-51.
24. BRANDSMA, A., and KETELLAPPER, R. H. 1979. A biparametric approach to spatial autocorrelation. Environment and Planning A, 11: 51-8.
25. BRAUN, D., and GILARDI, F. 2006. Taking "Galton's problem" seriously: towards a theory of policy diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18: 298-322.
26. BRAYBECK, B., and HUCKFELDT, R. 2002a. Spatially dispersed ties among interdependent citizens: connecting individuals and aggregates. Political Analysis, 10: 261-75.
27. BRAYBECK, B., and HUCKFELDT, R. 2002b. Urban contexts, spatially dispersed networks, and the diffusion of political information. Political Geography, 21: 195-220.
28. BRINKS, D., and COPPEDGE, M. 2006. Diffusion is no illusion: neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 39: 463-89.
29. BROOKS, S. 2005. Interdependent and domestic foundations of policy change: the diffusion of pension privatization around the world. International Studies Quarterly, 49: 273-94.
30. BRUECKNER, J. K. 2003. Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26: 175-88.
31. BRUNE, N., GARRETT, G., and KOGUT, B. 2004. The International Monetary Fund and the global spread of privatization. IMF Staff Papers, 51: 195-219.
32. Burridge, P. 1980. On the Cliff-Ord test for spatial autocorrelation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42: 107-8.
33. CALDEIRA, G. 1985. The transmission of legal precedent: a study of state supreme courts. American Political Science Review, 79: 178-94.
34. CASE, A., HINES, J., and ROSEN, H. 1993. Budget spillovers and fiscal policy interdependence: evidence from the states. Journal of Public Economics, 52: 285-307.
35. CHO, W. T. 2003. Contagion effects and ethnic contribution networks. American Journal of Political Science, 47: 368-87.
36. CHO, W. T., and GIMPEL, J. 2007. Spatial dimensions of Arab American voter mobilization after September 11. Political Geography, 26: 330-51.
37. CHO, W. T., and RUDOLPH, T. 2008. Emanating political participation: untangling the spatial structure behind participation. British Journal of Political Science, 38: 273-89.
38. CLIFF, A., and ORD, J. 1973. Spatial Autocorrelation. London: Pion.
39. CLIFF, A., and ORD, J. 1981. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.
40. CRAIN, R. 1966. Fluoridation: diffusion of an innovation among cities. Social Forces, 44: 467-76.
41. CRESSIE, N. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. New York: Wiley.
42. DAHL, R. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
43. DALEY, D., and GARAND, J. 2005. Horizontal diffusion, vertical diffusion, and internal pressure in state environmental policymaking, 1989-1998. American Politics Research, 33: 615-44.
44. DARMOFAL, D. 2006. Spatial econometrics and political science. Society for Political Methodology Working Paper Archive.
45. DOW, M. A. 1984. Biparametric approach to network autocorrelation: Galton's problem. Sociological Methods and Research, 13: 201-17.
46. EISING, R. 2002. Policy learning in embedded negotiations: explaining EU electricity liberalization. International Organization, 56: 85-120.
47. ELHORST, J. P. 2001. Dynamic models in space and time. Geographical Analysis, 33: 119-40.
48. ELHORST, J. P. 2003. Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Science Review, 26: 244-68.
49. ELHORST, J. P. 2005. Unconditional maximum likelihood estimation of linear and log-linear dynamic models for spatial panels. Geographical Analysis, 37: 85-106.
50. ELKINS, Z., GUZMAN, A., and SIMMONS, B. 2006. Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000. International Organization, 60: 811-46.
51. ELKINS, Z., and SIMMONS, B. 2005. On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 33-51.
52. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2004. Empirical modeling strategies for spatial interdependence: omitted-variable vs. simultaneity biases. Summer meetings of the Political Methodology Society.
53. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2006a. Spatio-temporal models for political-science panel and time-series-crosssection data. Summer meetings of the Political Methodology Society.
54. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2006b. Strategic interaction among EU governments in active-labor-market policymaking: subsidiarity and policy coordination under the European Employment Strategy. European Union Politics, 7: 167-89.
55. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2007a. Empirical models of international capital-tax competition. Pp. 43-72 in International Taxation Handbook, ed. G. Gregoriou and C. Read. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2007b. Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis, 15: 140-64.
57. FRANZESE, R., and HAYS, J. 2008. Interdependence in comparative politics: theory, empirics, substance. Comparative Political Studies, 41: 742-80.
58. FRIEDEN, J., and ROGOWSKI, R. 1996. The impact of the international economy on national policies: an analytical overview. In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, ed. R. O. Keohane. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. GARTZKE, E., and GLEDITSCH, K. S. 2006. Identity and conflict: ties that bind and differences that divide. European Journal of International Relations, 12: 53-87.
60. GENSCHEL, P. 2002. Globalization, tax competition, and the welfare state. Politics and Society, 30: 245-75.
61. GILARDI, F. 2005. The institutional foundations of regulatory capitalism: the diffusion of independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 84-101.
62. GLEDITSCH, K. S. 2002. All International Politics is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
63. GLEDITSCH, K. S. 2007. Civil war and its spread. In Handbook on Conflict Resolution, ed. J. Bercovitch, V. Kremenyuk, and I. W. Zartman. London: Sage.
64. GLEDITSCH, K. S., and BEARDSLEY, K. 2004. Nosy neighbors: third party actors in Central American civil conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48: 379-402.
65. GLEDITSCH, K. S., and WARD, M. 2000. War and peace in space and time: the role of democratization. International Studies Quarterly, 44: 1-29.
66. GLEDITSCH, K. S., and WARD, M. 2006. Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60: 911-33.
67. GLEDITSCH, K. S., and WARD, M. 2007. Diffusion and the spread of democratic institutions. In The Global Diffusion of Democracy and Markets, ed. F. Dobbins, G. Garret, and B. Simmons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. GODWIN, M., and SCHROEDEL, J. 2000. Policy diffusion and strategies for promoting policy change: evidence from California local gun control ordinances. Policy Studies Journal, 28: 760-76.
69. GOLDENBERG, E. N., TRAUGOTT, M. W., and BAUMGARTNER, F. K. 1986. Preemptive and reactive spending in U.S. House races. Political Behavior, 8: 3-20.
70. GOVEA, R., and WEST, G. 1981. Riot contagion in Latin America, 1949-1963. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 25: 349-68.
71. GRAY, V. 1973. Innovation in the states: a diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67: 1174-85.
72. GROSSBACK, L., NICHOLSON-CROTTY, S., and PETERSON, D. 2004. Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research, 32: 521-45.
73. HAINING, R. 1990. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. HOFF, P., and WARD, M. 2004. Modeling dependencies in international relations networks. Political Analysis, 12: 160-75.
75. HORDIJK, L. 1974. Spatial correlation in the disturbances of a linear interregional model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 4: 117-40.
76. HUCKFELDT, R., and SPRAGUE, J. 1993. Citizens, contexts, and politics. Pp. 281-303 in Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. A. W. Finifter. Washington, DC: APSA.
77. HUCKFELDT, R., JOHNSON, P. E., and SPRAGUE, J. 2005. Individuals, dyads and networks: autoregressive patterns of political influence. In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, ed. A. S. Zuckerman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
78. HUNTINGTON, S. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
79. JAHN, D. 2006. Globalization as "Galton's problem:" the missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization, 60: 401-31.
80. KAYSER, M. A. 2007. Partisan waves: international sources of electoral choice, Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
81. KELEJIAN, H. H., and PRUCHA, I. 1998. A generalized spatial two stage least squares procedures for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17: 99-121.
82. KELEJIAN, H. H., and PRUCHA, I. 1999. A generalized moments estimator for the autoregressive parameter in a spatial model. International Economic Review, 40: 509-33.
83. KELEJIAN, H. H., and PRUCHA, I. 2001. On the asymptotic distribution of the Moran I test statistic with applications. Journal of Econometrics, 104: 219-57.
84. KIM, C.-W., PHIPPS, T. T., and ANSELIN, L. 2003. Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45: 24-39.
85. KNILL, C. 2005. Introduction: cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12: 764-74.
86. KNOKE, D. 1982. The spread of municipal reform: temporal, spatial, and social dynamics. American Journal of Sociology, 87: 1314-39.
87. KRASNO, J., GREEN, D., and COWDEN, J. 1994. The dynamics of campaign fundraising in House elections. Journal of Politics, 56: 459-74.
88. LACOMBE, D. J. 2004. Does econometric methodology matteró An analysis of public policy using spatial econometric techniques. Geographical Analysis, 36: 105-18.
89. LEE, C. K., and STRANG, D. 2006. The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: network emulation and theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60: 883-909.
90. LESAGE, J. P. 2000. Bayesian estimation of limited dependent variable spatial autoregressive models. Geographical Analysis, 32: 19-35.
91. LESAGE, J. P. 1999. Spatial econometrics.
92. LI, R., and THOMPSON, W. 1975. The "coup contagion" hypothesis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19: 63-88.
93. LIN, T. M., WU, C. E., and LEE, F. Y. 2006. "Neighborhood" influence on the formation of national identity in Taiwan: spatial regression with disjoint neighborhoods. Political Research Quarterly, 59: 35-46.
94. LUTZ, J. 1987. Regional leadership patterns in the diffusion of public policies. American Politics Quarterly, 15: 387-98.
95. MC MILLEN, D. P. 1992. Probit with spatial autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, 32: 335-48.
96. MESEGUER, C. 2004. What role for learningó The diffusion of privatisation in OECD and Latin American countries. Journal of Public Policy, 24: 299-325.
97. MESEGUER, C. 2005. Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 67-82.
98. MINTROM, M. 1997a. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41: 738-70.
99. MINTROM, M. 1997b. The state-local nexus in policy innovation diffusion: the case of school choice. Publius: Journal of Federalism, 27: 41-59.
100. MINTROM, M., and VERGARI, S. 1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: the case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics, 60: 126-48.
101. MOONEY, C. 2001. Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly, 54: 103-24.
102. MOSSBERGER, K. 1999. State-federal diffusion and policy learning: from enterprise zones to empowerment zones. Publius: Journal of Federalism, 29: 31-50.
103. NAROLL, R. 1961. Two solutions to Galton's Problem. Philosophy of Science, 28: 15-39.
104. NAROLL, R. 1965. Galton's problem: the logic of cross-cultural analysis. Social Research, 32: 429-51.
105. NAROLL, R. 1970. What have we learned from cross-cultural surveysó American Anthropologist, 72: 1227-88.
106. O'LOUGHLIN, J., WARD, M., LOFDAHL, C., COHEN, J., BROWN, D., REILLY, D., GLEDITSCH, K., and SHIN, M. 1998. The diffusion of democracy, 1946-1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88: 545-74.
107. ORD, J. K. 1975. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70: 120-6.
108. PAELINCK, J., and KLAASSEN, L. 1979. Spatial Econometrics. Farnborough: Saxon House.
109. PLÜMPER, T., and SCHNEIDER, C. J. 2007. The computation of convergence, or: how to chase a black cat in a dark room.
110. RIPLEY, B. D. 1981. Spatial Statistics. New York: Wiley.
111. ROGERS, E. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
112. ROSE, R. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning across Time and Space. London: Chatham House.
113. SALEHYAN, I., and GLEDITSCH, K. S. 2006. Refugees and the spread of civil war. International Organization, 60: 335-66.
114. SCHNEIDER, A., and INGRAM, H. 1988. Systematically "pinching" ideas: a comparative approach to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 8: 61-80.
115. SHIN, M., and WARD, M. 1999. Lost in space: political geography and the defense-growth tradeoff. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43: 793-816.
116. SHIPAN, C., and VOLDEN, C. 2006. Bottom-up federalism: the diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. cities to states. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 825-43.
117. SIGNORINO, C. 1999. Strategic interaction and the statistical analysis of international conflict. American Political Science Review, 93: 279-98.
118. SIGNORINO, C. 2002. Strategy and selection in international relations. International Interactions, 28: 93-115.
119. SIGNORINO, C. 2003. Structure and uncertainty in discrete choice models. Political Analysis, 11: 316-44
120. SIGNORINO, C., and TARAR, A. 2006. A unified theory and test of extended immediate deterrence. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 586-605.
121. SIGNORINO, C., and YILMAZ, K. 2003. Strategic misspecification in regression models. American Journal of Political Science, 47: 551-66.
122. SIMMONS, B., DOBBIN, F., and GARRETT, G. 2006. Introduction: the international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60: 781-810.
123. SIMMONS, B., and ELKINS, Z. 2004. The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98: 171-89.
124. STARR, H. 1991. Democratic dominoes: diffusion approaches to the spread of democracy in the international system. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 35: 356-81.
125. SWANK, D. 2006. Tax policy in an era of internationalization: explaining the spread of neoliberalism. International Organization, 60: 847-82.
126. VIJVERBERG, W. P. 1997. Monte Carlo evaluation of multivariate normal probabilities. Journal of Econometrics, 76: 281-307.
127. VOLDEN, C. 2006. States as policy laboratories: emulating success in the children's health insurance program. American Journal of Political Science, 50: 294-312.
128. WALKER, J. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63: 880-99.
129. WALKER, J. 1973. Problems in research on diffusion of policy innovations. American Political Science Review, 67: 1186-91.
130. WARD, M., and GLEDITSCH, K. S. 2002. Location, location, location: an MCMC approach to modeling the spatial context of war and peace. Political Analysis, 10: 244-60.
131. WHITTLE, P. 1954. On stationary processes in the plane. Biometrika, 41: 434-49.