Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 120, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 539-546

  Antonio, Anna Liza M ^a,b   Crespi, Catherine M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast cancer; Interobserver agreement; Kappa; Mammography

Indexed keywords

BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77950861426     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0770-x     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2009. Accessed 1 May 2009. http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/500809web.pdf
2. Wiratkapun C, Lertsithichai P, Wibulpholprasert B (2006) Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5. J Med Assoc Thai 89(8): 1253-1259 (Pubitemid 44358725)
3. Masroor I (2005) Prediction of benignity or malignancy of a lesion using BI-RADS. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 15(11):686-688
4. Resende LM, Matias MA, Oliveira GM, Salles MA, Melo FH, Gobbi H (2008) Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and Le Gal's classifications. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 30(2): 75-79
5. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS (2006) BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 239(2): 385-391. (epub 2006 Mar 28)
6. Cosar ZS, Cetin M, Tepe TK, Cetin R, Zarali AC (2005) Concordance of mammographic classifications of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis: utility of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (fourth edition). Clin Imaging 29(6): 389-395 (Pubitemid 41597075)
7. Berg WA, D'Orsi CJ, Jackson. VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, Crewson PE (2002) Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 224(3): 871-880
8. Gülsün M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyürek M (2003) Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Eur J Radiol 47(3): 227-231.
9. Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ (2000) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174(6): 1769-1777 (Pubitemid 30346755)
10. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Marcelli G, Pellizzoni R, Pesce B, Risso G, Russo F, Scorsolini A (2005) Categorizing breast mammographic density: intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BI-RADS density categories. Breast 14(4): 269-275 (Pubitemid 41110187)
11. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Apruzzese A, Bassetti E, Brancato B, Carozzi F, Catarzi S, Lamberini MP, Marcelli G, Pellizzoni R, Pesce B, Risso G, Russo F, Scorsolini A (2006) Reader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience). Breast 15(1): 44-51 (epub 2005 Aug 1) (Pubitemid 43210548)
12. Ooms EA, Zonderland HM, Eijkemans MJ, Kriege M., Mahdavian Delavary B, Burger CW, Ansink AC (2007) Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Breast 16(6): 568-576 (Pubitemid 350154446)
13. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE Jr (1996) Breast imaging reporting and data system, standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(4): 773-778 (Pubitemid 126532715)
14. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V (1998) Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 90(23): 1801-1809 (Pubitemid 28559892)
15. Fleiss JL (1973) Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley, New York, pp 598-626
16. Wenkel E, Heckmann M, Heinrich M, Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz WA, Janka R (2008) Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification-a pilot study. Rofo 180(9): 804-808 (epub 2008 Aug 14)
17. Caramella T, Chapellier C, Ettore F, Raoust I, Chamorey E, Balu-Maestro C (2007) Value of MRI in the surgical planning of invasive lobular breast carcinoma: a prospective and a retrospective study of 57 cases: comparison with physical examination, conventional imaging, and histology. Clin Imaging 31(3): 155-161 (Pubitemid 46601797)
18. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, Ohlinger R, Grunwald S, Blohmer JU, Winzer KJ, Weber S, Kristiansen G, Ebert B, Kümmel S (2006) Real-time elastography- an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(3): 335-340 (Pubitemid 44409062)
19. Teifke A, Vomweg TW, Hlawatsch A, Nasresfahani A, Kern A, Victor A, Schmidt M, Bittinger F, Düber C (2006) Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money? Rofo 178(3):330-336
20. Lorenzen J, Wedel AK, Lisboa BW, Löning T, Adam G (2005) Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome. Rofo 177(11): 1545-1551
21. Yamada T, Saito M, Ishibashi T, Tsuboi M, Matsuhashi T, Sato A, Saito H, Takahashi S, Onuki K, Ouchi N (2004) Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening. Radiat Med 22(6): 408-412 (Pubitemid 40144019)
22. Pijnappel RM, Peeters PH, Hendriks JH, Mali WP (2004) Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for non-palpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications. Br J Radiol 77(916): 312-314
23. Castella C, Kinkel K, Eckstein MP, Sottas PE, Verdun FR, Bochud FO (2007) Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features. Acad Radiol 14(12): 1486-1499 (Pubitemid 350116640)
24. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Floyd CE Jr (1996) Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 198(1): 131-135
25. Gupta S, Chyn PF, Markey MK (2006) Breast cancer CADx based on BI-RAds descriptors from two mammographic views. Med Phys 33(6): 1810-1817 (Pubitemid 43830269)
26. Skaane P, Diekmann F, Balleyguier C, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Abdelnoor M, Niklason L (2008) Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading. Eur Radiol 18(6): 1134-1143 (epub 2008 Feb 27)
27. Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Kontogiannis E, Gourtsoyiannis N (2001) Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 36(12): 726-733 (Pubitemid 34024429)
28. Venta LA, Hendrick RE, Adler YT, DeLeon P, Mengoni PM, Scharl AM, Comstock CE, Hansen L, Kay N, Coveler A, Cutter G (2001) Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(5): 1241-1248 (Pubitemid 32323269)
29. Thomas A, Kümmel S, Fritzsche F, Warm M, Ebert B, Hamm B, Fischer T (2006) Real-time sonoelastography performed in addition to B-mode ultrasound and mammography: improved differentiation of breast lesions? Acad Radiol 13(12): 1496-1504
30. Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Roubidoux MA, Bailey JE, Paramagul C, Blane CE, Klein KA, Sonnad SS, Chan HP (2006) Mammographic density measured with quantitative computeraided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 240(3):656-665 (epub 2006 Jul 20) (Pubitemid 44267320)
31. Taplin SH, Ichikawa LE, Kerlikowske K et al (2002) Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography. Radiology 222(2): 529-535 (Pubitemid 34106131)
32. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ (2005) Digital mammography. Radiology 234(2): 353-362
33. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL (2009) Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(4): 1010-1018
34. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A (2007) Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study, Radiology 244: 708-717 (Pubitemid 47292081)
35. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353: 1773-1783 (erratum, in N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1840) (Pubitemid 41549889)
36. Rastogi T, Hildesheim A, Sinha R (2004) Opportunities for cancer epidemiology in developing countries. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 909-917 (Pubitemid 39472957)
37. Alwan A (1997) Non-communicable diseases: a major challenge to public health in the region. East Mediterr Health J 3: 6-16
38. Kanavos P (2006) The rising burden of cancer in the developing world. Ann Oncol 17(Suppl 8): viii15-viii23
39. Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. Lesaffre E, Rizopoulos D, Tsonaka R (2007) The logistic transform for bounded outcome scores. Biostatistics 8(1): 72-85 (epub 2006 Apr 5) (Pubitemid 44906103)