Concordance of mammographic classifications of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis: Utility of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (fourth edition)

Clinical Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 389-395

  Coşar, Z Sumru ^a,c   Çetin, Meltem ^a   Kizil Tepe, Tuba ^a   Çetin, Recep ^b   Zarali, Aliye C ^a  

^a Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

^c NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

BI RADS (fourth edition); Breast cancer; Breast microcalcifications; Interobserver variability; Positive predictive value

Indexed keywords

CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); DIAGNOSIS; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL IMAGING; MORPHOLOGY;

BI-RADS (FOURTH EDITION); BREAST CANCER; BREAST MICROCALCIFICATIONS; INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY; POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE;

TUMORS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CALCIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MORPHOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 27744583306     PISSN: 08997071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. SA Feig, BM Galkin, and HD Muir Evaluation of breast microcalcifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen radiographs Recent Results Cancer Res 105 1987 111 124
2. EA Sickles Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers AJR Am J Roentgenol 146 1986 661 663
3. American College of Radiology Breast imaging reporting data system 3rd ed. 1998 American College of Radiology Reston (VA)
4. CJ D'Orsi The American College of Radiology Mammography Lexicon: an attempt to standardize terminology AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 1996 779 780
5. JA Baker, PJ Kornguth, and CE Floyd Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description AJR Am J Roentgenol 166 1996 773 778
6. WA Berg, CJ D'orsi, and VP Jackson Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations of feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography Radiology 224 2002 871 880
7. RM Pijnappel, PHM Peeters, and JHCL Hendriks Reproducibility of mammographic classifications for nonpalpable suspect lesions with microcalcifications Br J Radiol 77 2004 312 314
8. L Liberman, AF Abramson, and FB Squires The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories AJR Am J Roentgenol 171 1998 35 40
9. American College of Radiology Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4th ed. 2003 American College of Radiology Reston
10. L Liberman, and JH Menell Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Radiol Clin North Am 40 2002 409 430
11. LD Fisher, and G Van Belle Biostatistics, a methodology for the health sciences Categorical data: contingency tables 1993 A Wiley-Interscience Publication John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 246 303 [Chapter 7]
12. B Dawson, and RG Trapp Basic & clinical biostatistics Research questions about one group 3rd ed. 2001 International editions McGraw-Hill 92 131 [Chapter 5]
13. JR Landis, and GG Koch The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1977 159 174
14. DB Kopans Breast Imaging Report: data management, false negative mammography and the breast imaging audit DB Kopans Breast imaging 2nd ed. 1998 Lippincott-Raven Publishers Philadelphia 761 796
15. MH Kim, and E Kim Nonpalpable mammographic clustered microcalcification: interobserver agreement and positive predictive value of Acr Bi-Rads lexicon and final assessment categories RSNA 213 1999 200
16. WA Berg, C Campassi, and P Langenberg Breast imaging reporting and data system: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 2000 1769 1777
17. SG Orel, N Kay, and C Reynolds BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy Radiology 211 1999 845 850
18. M Gülsün, FB Demirkazýk, and M ArIyürek Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification Eur J Radiol 47 2003 227 231
19. HM Zonderland, TL Pope, and AJ Nieborg The positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population Eur Radiol 14 2004 1743 1750