Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™) and Le Gal's classifications;Avaliação de microcalcificações mamárias de acordo com as classificações do Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS™) e de Le Gal

Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 75-79

  De Resende, Lúcio Márcio Perri ^a,d   Matias, Marco Antônio Rodrigues Freire ^b   De Oliveira, Gracinda Maria Baltazar ^c   Salles, Márcio Almeida ^b   Melo, Frederico Henrique Corrêa ^a   Gobbi, Helenice ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b Maternidade Odete Valadares   (Brazil)

^c Clínica Gracinda Baltazar Mamografia e Ultra som   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast diseases classification; Breast diseases pathology; Calcinosis classification; Mammography; Predictive value of test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; CALCINOSIS; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BREAST DISEASES; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 45749089715     PISSN: 01007203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-72032008000200005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Liberman L, Menell JH. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(3):409-30.
2. Chakrabarti J, Evans AJ, James J, Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Macmillan RD. Accuracy of mammography in predicting histological extent of carcinoma ductal in situ (DCIS). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(10):1089-92.
3. Corn CC. Review of 125 site select stereotactic large-core breast biopsy procedures. Breast J. 2003;9(3):147-52.
4. Gülsün M, Dermikazik FB, Ariyürek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Eur J Radiol. 2003;47(3):227-31.
5. Kouskos E, Gui GP, Mantas D, Revenas K, Rallis N, Antonopoulou Z, et al. Wire localisation biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions: reasons of unsuccessful excision. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27(3):262-6.
6. Leung JW, Sickles EA. The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(5):773-89.
7. Le Gal M, Chavanne G, Pellier D. Valeur diagnostique des microcalcifications groupées découvertes par mammographies. Bull Cancer. 1984;71(1):57-64.
8. American College of Radiology (ACR). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS.). 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
9. D'Orsi CJ, Newell MS. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45(5):751-63.
10. Ellis IO. Ductal carcinoma in situ. In: Elston CW, Ellis IO, editors. The breast. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Linvinstone; 1998. p. 249-81.
11. Page DL, Anderson TJ. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Edinburg: Churchill Livstone; 1987.
12. Burnside ES, Ochsner JE, Fowler KJ, Fine JP, Salkowski LR, Rubin DL, et al.
13. Use of microcalcifications descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology. 2007;242(2):388-95.
14. Salles MA, Matias MARF, Perez AA, Gobbi H. Carcinoma ductal in situ da mama: critérios para diagnóstico e abordagem em hospitais públicos de Belo Horizonte. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2006;28(12):721-7.
15. Ernst MF, Roukema JA. Diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer: a review. Breast. 2002;11(1):13-22.