Toward a general theory of diary panels

Psychological Reports

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1131-1153

  Toh, Rex S ^a   Hu, Michael Y ^b  

^a SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950361581     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.105.F.1131-1153     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aneshensel, C. S., Becerra, R. M., Fiedler, E. P, & Schuler, R. H. (1989) Participation of Mexican American female adolescents in a longitudinal panel survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53, 548-562.
2. Asher, W., & Vockell, E. I. (1974) Errors in interpreting regression toward the mean: reply to Lyton, Croxen, & Pysh. Psychological Reports, 35, 192-194.
3. Belli, R. F., Stafford, F. P., & Alwin, D. F. (2009) Future directions in calendar and time diary methods. In V. Knight, S. Conelly, & C. Freeman (Eds.), Calendar and time diary: methods in life course research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 307-316.
4. Berg, I. D., Maxwell, J. O., & Harris, G. (1986) Estimates of frequency: atribute or atribution? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 496-508.
5. Blair, E., Sudman, S., Bradburn, N., & Stocking, C. (1977) How to ask questions about drinking and sex: response efects in measuring consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 316-321.
6. Bloch, P. H., & Richins, M. L. (1983) A theoretical model for the study of product importance perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 47, 69-81.
7. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8. Carman, J. R. (1974) Consumer panels. In Robert Ferber (Ed.), Handbook of marketing research. New York: McGraw-Hill. P. 2-200-216
9. Chandon, P., Morwitz, V. G., & Reinartz, J. (2005) Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity efects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69, 1-14. (Pubitemid 40554515)
10. Christian, C. W., & Frischmann, P. J. (1989) Atrition in the statistics of income panel of individual returns. National Tax Journal, 42, 495-501.
11. Churchill, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2005) Marketing research: methodological foundations. (9th ed.) Mason, OH: Thomson.
12. Conrad, F., & Brown, N. (1994) Strategies for estimating category frequency: efects of abstractness and distinctiveness. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Pp. 1345-1350.
13. Cordell, W. N., & Rahmel, H. A. (1962) Are Nielsen ratings afected by noncoopera-tion, conditioning, or nonresponse error? Journal of Advertising Research, 2, 45-49.
14. Coyle, P. G. (1993) A critical analysis of Siegel's case for revision of the learning disability constraint. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 40, 5-21.
15. Craig, C. S., & McCann, J. M. (1978) Item nonresponse in mail surveys: extent and correlate. Journal of Marketing, 15, 285-287.
16. Crique, M. H. (1979) Response bias and risk rations in epidemiological studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 394-399.
17. Darlington, R. B. (1990) Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
19. Durand, M. R., & Lambert, Z. V. (1988) Don't know responses in surveys: analyses and interpretational consequences. Journal of Business Research, 11, 169-188.
20. Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1960) A study of some potential biases in the operations of a consumer panel. Applied Statistics, 9, 20-27.
21. Elliott, S. W., & Anderson J. R. (1995) Efect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 815-836.
22. Estes, W. K. (1994) Array models for category learning. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 500-549.
23. Ferber, R. F. (1966) The reliability of consumer reports of fnancial assets and debts. Urbana, IL: Bureau of Economic and Business Research, Univ. of Illinois.
24. Fiedler, K. (1991) The tricky nature of skewed frequency tables: an information-loss account of distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 60, 24-36.
25. Fiedler, K., & Armbruster, T. (1994) Two halfs may be more than one whole: category split efects on frequency illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 633-645. (Pubitemid 24779928)
26. Filion, F. (1976) Exploring and correcting for nonresponse bias using follow-ups of nonrespondents. Pacifc Sociological Review, 19, 401-408.
27. Fisher, R. (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303-315.
28. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998) A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44, 879-895. (Pubitemid 128591682)
29. Furby, L. (1973) Interpreting regression toward the mean in development research. Developmental Psychology, 8, 172-179.
30. Galton, F. (1885) Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. Journal of the Anthropological Institute, 15, 246-263.
31. Golany, B., Phillips, F. Y., & Rousseau, J. J. (1991) Few-wave versus continuous panels: some issues of atrition bias and variance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 6, 273-280.
32. Gorfein, D. (1962) Phenomenal regression and the need for control groups in atitude change studies. Psychological Reports, 11, 23-24.
33. Goudy, W. J. (1985) Sample atrition and multivariate analysis in retirement history study. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 358-367. (Pubitemid 15010359)
34. Greenland, S. (1977) Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 106, 184-187. (Pubitemid 8190166)
35. Greenwald, A. G., & Levitt, C. (1984) Audience involvement in advertising: four levels. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 581-592.
36. Grooteart, C. (1986) The use of multiple diaries in a household expenditure survey in Hong Kong. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 938-944.
37. Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008) The impact of nonresponse rates on nonre-sponse bias: a meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 167-189.
38. Hintzman, D. L. (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
39. Hu, M. Y., Toh, R. S., & Lee, E. (1996) Impact of the level of aggregation on response accuracy in surveys of behavioral frequency. Marketing Leters, 7, 371-382. (Pubitemid 126510532)
40. Hu, M. Y., Toh, R. S., & Lee, E. (2000) Survey accuracy as a function of usage rate. Marketing Leters, 11, 335-348.
41. Jones, W. H., & Lang, J. R. (1980) Sample composition bias in a mail survey: A comparison of inducement methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 69-76.
42. Keillor, B., Owens, D., & Pettiohn, C. (2001) A cross-cultural/cross- national study of infuencing factors and socially desirable response biases. International Journal of Market Research, 43, 63-84. (Pubitemid 33257397)
43. Kessler, R. C., & Greenberg, D. F. (1981) Linear panel analysis: model of quantitative change. New York: Academic Press.
44. Kupek, E. (1988) Determinants of item nonresponse in a large national sex survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27, 581-594.
45. Lee, E., Hu, M. Y., & Toh, R. S. (2000) Are consumer survey results distorted? Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 125-133.
46. Lee, E., Hu, M. Y., & Toh, R. S. (2004) Respondent noncooperation in surveys and diaries. International Journal of Market Research, 46, 311-326.
47. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
48. Markides, K., Dickson, H., & Pappas, C. (1982) Characteristics of dropouts in longitudinal research on aging: a study of Mexican and Anglos. Experimental Aging Research, 8, 163-167. (Pubitemid 13208382)
49. McKenzie, J. (1983) The accuracy of telephone call data collected by diary methods. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 417-427.
50. Morwitz, V. G., Johnson, E., & Schmittlein, D. (1993) Does measuring intent change behavior? Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46-61.
51. Neter, J. (1970) Measurement errors in reports of consumer expenditures. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 11-25.
52. Norris, F. H. (1987) Efects of atrition on relationships between variables in surveys of older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42, 97-105.
53. Paulhus, D. (1991) Measurement and control of response bias. In I. J. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, L. S. Wrightsman, & F. M. Andrews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological atitudes. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 17-59.
54. Peltier, B., & Walsh, J. (1990) An investigation of response bias in the Chapman scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 803-815.
55. Powers, E., & Bultena, G. (1972) Characteristics of decreased dropouts in longitudinal research. Journal of Gerontology, 27, 530-535.
56. Rogosa, D. (1988) Myths about longitudinal research. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research. New York: Springer. Pp. 171-210.
57. Schwarz, N., & Sudman, S. (1994) Autobiographical memory and the validity of prospective reports. New York: Springer.
58. Snow, D. L., Terbes, J. K., & Arthur, M. W. (1992) Panel atrition and external validity in adolescent substance use research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 804-807.
59. Sobol, M. G. (1959) Panel mortality and panel bias. American Statistical Association Journal, 54, 552-568.
60. Sturgis, P. A. N., & Bruton-Smith, I. (2008) Atitudes over time: the psychology of panel conditioning. In P. Lynn (Ed.), Methodology of longitudinal surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Pp. 113-126.
61. Sudman, S., & Ferber, R. (1979) Consumer panels. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
62. Sussman, M. B. (1964) Use of the longitudinal design in studies of long-term illness. Some advantages and limitations. Gerontologist, 4, 25-29.
63. Toh, R. S., & Hu, M. Y. (1996) Natural mortality and participation fatigue as potential biases in diary panels: impact of some demographic factors and behavioral characteristics on systematic atrition. Journal of Business Research, 35, 129-138.
64. Toh, R. S., & Hu, M. Y. (2008) Averaging to minimize or eliminate regression toward the mean to measure pure experimental efects. Psychological Reports, 102, 665-677.
65. Toh, R. S., Lee, E., & Hu, M. Y. (2004) Empirical tests on regressive estimations: implications on surveys and diaries. Psychological Reports, 94, 1061-1074. (Pubitemid 39109626)
66. Toh, R. S., Lee, E., & Hu, M. Y. (2006) Social desirability bias in diary panels is evident in panelists' behavioral frequency. Psychological Reports, 99, 322-334. (Pubitemid 44831794)
67. Wang, K., Cantor, D., & Safir, A. (2000) Panel conditioning in a random digit dial survey. American Statistical Association, SRMS Proceedings. Pp. 822-826.
68. William, K. W., & Durso, F. T. (1986) Judgment category frequency: automaticity or availability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 387-396.
69. Wind, Y., & Lerner, D. (1979) On the measurement of purchase data: surveys versus purchase diaries. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 39-47.
70. Winer, R. S. (1983) Atrition bias in econometric models estimated with panel data. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 177-186.
71. Zabel, J. E. (1998) An analysis of atrition in the panel study of income dynamics and the survey of income and program participation with an application to a model of labor market behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 479-506. (Pubitemid 28437652)