Awareness, training and trust in interaction with adaptive spam filters

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 909-912

  Cramer, Henriette S M ^a   Evers, Vanessa ^a   Van Someren, Maarten W ^a   Wielinga, Bob J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Autonomy; Filters; Spam; Trainable systems

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVITY; AUTONOMOUS DECISION; AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS; AUTONOMY; RULE-BASED FILTERS; SPAM; SURVEY TECHNIQUES; TRAINABLE SYSTEM;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; FILTERS (FOR FLUIDS); HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTERNET;

SURVEYS;

EID: 77950348710     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518839     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Alpert S.R., Karat J., Karat C., Brodie C. and Vergo J.G. User attitudes regarding a user-adaptive e-Commerce web site. UMUAI 13, 4 (2003), 373-396.
2. Cramer, H., Evers, V., Van Someren, M., Ramlal, S., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L. and Wielinga, B. The effects of transparency on trust and acceptance in interaction with a content-based art recommender. UMUAI 18, 5 (2008), 455- 496.
3. Dzindolet M., Peterson S.A., Pomranky R.A., Pierce L.G. and Beck H.P. The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum-Comp Stud 58, 6 (2003), 697-718.
4. Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H. The Elements of Computer Credibility. In Proc. CHI'99, ACM Press (1999), 80-87.
5. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G. and Riedl, J.T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inform. Svst. 22, 1 (2004), 5-53.
6. Lee J.D. and See K.A. Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Fact 42, 1 (2004), 50-80.
7. Jameson, A. and Schwarzkopf, E. Pros and Cons of Controllability. In Proc. AH'02 (2002), 193-202.
8. Jian, J.Y., Bisantz, A.M., and Drury, C.G. Foundations for an Empirically Determined Scale of Trust in Automated Systems. Int. J. Cog. Erg. 4, 1 (2000), 53-71.
9. Jasang, A. and Lo Presti, S. Analysing the relationship between risk and trust. In Proc. Trust Man. (2004).
10. Maes, P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. CACM 37, 7 (1994), 30-40.
11. Muir B.M. and Moray N. Trust in automation. Part II. Ergonomics 39, (1996), 429-460.
12. Sinha, R. and Swearingen, K. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In Proc CHI '02, ACM Press (2002), 830-831.
13. Tullio, J., Dey, A. K., Chalecki, J., and Fogarty, J. How it works: A field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system. In Proc. CHI'07, ACM Press (2007), 31-40.
14. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003), 425-478.
15. Victor, P., Cornelis, C, De Cock, M, da Silva, P.P. Gradual Trust and Distrust in Recommender Systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems (In Press).
16. Waern, A. User Involvement in Automatic Filtering: an Experimental Study. UMUAI 14, 2-3(2004). 201-237.