Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location

Psychological Research

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 291-301

  Schankin, Andrea ^a   Valle Inclán, Fernando ^b   Hackley, Steven A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 77950300837     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-009-0247-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436. doi: 10. 1163/156856897X00357.
2. Coles, M. G. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251-269. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 1989. tb01916. x.
3. de Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 20. 4. 731.
4. de Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, B., & Mulder, L. J. (1988). Use of partial information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 14. 4. 682.
5. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi: 10. 1016/j. jneumeth. 2003. 10. 009.
6. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111. doi: 10. 1002/hbm. 10010.
7. Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioural performance. Acta Psychologica, 101, 293-313.
8. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Links between conscious awareness and response inhibition: Evidence from masked priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 514-520.
9. Galletti, C., Battaglini, P. P., & Fattori, P. (1995). Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2486-2501. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1460-9568. 1995. tb01047. x.
10. Graham, N. (1992). Breaking the visual input into parts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 55-61. doi: 10. 1111/1467-8721. ep11509742.
11. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 14. 3. 331.
12. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268. doi: 10. 1007/BF00419656.
13. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap. Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 97. 2. 253.
15. Miller, J., & Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195-209. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 121. 2. 195.
16. Mishra, J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2008). Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing. Vision Research. doi: 10. 1016/j. visres. 2008. 02. 018.
17. Proctor, R. W., & Lu, C. M. (1999). Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks. Memory & Cognition, 27, 63-77.
18. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 86. 3. 446.
19. Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 31, 51-55.
20. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, the Simon effect: comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 152-158. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 29. 1. 152.
21. Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 223-230. doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 03. 004.
22. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-3004. doi: 10. 1037/h0020586.
23. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
24. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 26. 2. 648.
25. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162. doi: 10. 1016/0301-0511(95)05181-3.
26. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., & De Labra, C. (2003). Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: Implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67, 240-243. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-003-0131-z.
27. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A., de Labra, C., & Alvarez, A. (1999). Early visual processing during binocular rivalry studied with visual evoked potentials. NeuroReport, 10, 21-25.
28. Valle-Inclán, F., Sohn, F., & Redondo, M. (2008). Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location. Psychophysiology, 45, 279-285. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1469-8986. 2007. 00616. x.
29. Vallesi, A., Mapelli, D., Schiff, S., Amodio, P., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? Cognition, 96, B33-B43. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2004. 11. 009.
30. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731-751. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 27. 3. 731.
31. Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S-R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 336-346.
32. Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). The interaction of stimulus- and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162. doi: 10. 1016/0013-4694(96)95602-3.
33. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005a). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453-464. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 31. 3. 453.
34. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005b). The Simon effect for vertical S-R relations: Changing the mechanism by randomly varying the S-R mapping rule? Psychological Research, 71, 219-233. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-005-0023-5.
35. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2007). Response coding in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 71, 401-410. doi: 10. 1007/s00426-005-0027-1.