Spatial compatibility between stimulated eye and response location

Psychophysiology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 279-285

  Valle Inclán, Fernando ^a   Sohn, Felix ^b   Redondo, Milagros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Eye of origin; LRP; Monocular stimulation; Simon effect; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 38849139079     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: 14698986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00616.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ansorge, U. (2003). Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67, 174 183.
2. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433 436.
3. Coles, M. G. H. (1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251 269.
4. Courtiere, A., Hardouin, J., Burle, B., Vidal, F. Hasbroucq, T. (2007). Simon effect in the rat: A new model for studying the neural bases of the dual-route architecture. Behavioral Brain Research, 179, 69 75.
5. Danziger, S., Kingstone, A. Ward, R. (2001). Enviromentally defined frame of reference: Their time course and sensitivity to spatial cues and attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 494 503.
6. de Jong, R., Liang, C.-C. Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731 750.
7. de Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, B. Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). The use of partial information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682 692.
8. Delorme, A. Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9 21.
9. Galletti, C., Battaglini, P. P. Fattori, P. (1995). Eye position influence on the parieto-occipital area PO (V6) of the macaque monkey. European Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 2486 2501.
10. Graham, N. (1992). Breaking the visual input into parts. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 55 61.
11. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W. Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331 344.
12. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261 268.
13. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T. Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap. Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253 270.
14. Lu, C. H. Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174 207.
15. Luck, S. (2005). An introduction to event-related potential technique. Boston, MA : MIT Press.
16. Mapp, A. P., Ono, H. Barbeito, R. (2003). What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contendious review. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 310 317.
17. Michaels, C. F. Turvey, M. T. (1979). Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychological Research, 41, 1 61.
18. Miller, J., Coles, M. G. H. Chakraborty, S. (1996). Dissociation between behavioral and psychophysiological measures of response preparation. Acta Psychologica, 94, 189 208.
19. Miller, J. Hackley, S. A. (1992). Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 195 209.
20. Miller, J., Patterson, T. Ulrich, R. (1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99 115.
21. Nakayama, K. (1996). Binocular surface perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93, 634 639.
22. Ooi, T. L., Optom, B. He, Z. J. (2001). Sensory eye dominance. Optometry, 72, 168 178.
23. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437 442.
24. Pitzalis, S., Galletti, C., Huang, R. S., Patria, F., Committeri, G., Galati, G., et al 2006). Wide-field retinotopy defines human cortical visual area v6. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 7962 7973.
25. Roth, H. L., Lora, A. N. Heilman, K. M. (2002). Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention. Brain, 125, 2023 2035.
26. Shipp, S., Blanton, M. Zeki, S. (1998). A visuo-somatomotor pathway through superior parietal cortex in the macaque monkey: Cortical connections of areas V6 and V6A. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 3171 3193.
27. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: an integrated perspective (pp. 31 88). Amsterdam : North-Holland.
28. Simon, J. R. Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300 304.
29. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G. Mulder, L. J. M. (1987). The continuous flow model revisited: Perceptual and motor aspects. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 40 (Suppl:), 270 278.
30. Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127 135.
31. Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H. Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345 1363.
32. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C. Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648 670.
33. Treccani, B., Umiltà, C. Tagliabue, M. (2006). Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 268 286.
34. Umiltà, C. Nicoletti, R. (1992). An integrated model of the Simon effect. In J. Alegria, D. Holender, J. Junça de Morais M. Radeau (Eds.), Analytic approaches to human cognition (pp. 331 350). Amsterdam : Elsevier.
35. Urcuioli, P. J., Vu, K. P. Proctor, R. W. (2005). A Simon effect in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Genneral, 134, 93 107.
36. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147 162.
37. Valle-Inclán, F., Blanco, M., Soto, D. Leirós, L. (in press). A new method to asses eye dominance. Psicologica Available at :.
38. Valle-Inclán, F., Hackley, S. A. deLabra, C. (2003). Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: Implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67, 240 244.
39. Valle-Inclán, F., Lamas, J., Jaquet, M., Vidal, E., de, Labra C. Hackley, S. A. (2003). There is no LRP error dip during the Simon effect when subjects aren't aware of stimulus location. Psychophysiology, 40 (Suppl.), s86.
40. Vanni, S., Tanskanen, T., Seppä, M., Uutela, K. Hari, R. (2001). Coinciding early activation of the human primary visual cortex and anteromedial cuneus. Proceedings of the Nacional Academy of Sciences, USA, 98, 2776 2780.
41. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T. Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731 751.
42. Wiegand, K. Wascher, E. (2005a). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453 464.
43. Wiegand, K. Wascher, E. (2005b). The Simon effect for vertical S-R relations: Changing the mechanism by randomly varying the S-R mapping rule? Psychological Research, 71, 219 233.