Community and individuality: Performing identity in applied linguistics

Written Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 159-188

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Academic writing; Applied linguistics; Argument; Discourse identity; Reader engagement

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950271376     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088309357846     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Azar, M. (1997). Concession relations as argumentation. Text, 17, 301-316.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and identity. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
4. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
5. Bizzell, P. (1989). Cultural criticism: A social approach to studying writing. Rhetoric Review, 7, 224-230.
6. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.
7. Cameron, D. (1992). Feminism and linguistic theory. London: MacMillan.
8. Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.
9. Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.
10. Cameron, D. (2006a). The myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Cameron, D. (2006b). On language and sexual politics. London: Routledge.
12. de Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. (Eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
14. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
15. Gee, J. (1999). An Introduction to discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
16. Hanlein, H. (1998). Studies in authorship recognition-A corpus-based approach. Frankfort, KY: Peter Lang.
17. Hatch, J., Hill, C., & Hayes, J. (1993). When the messenger is the message. Written Communication, 10, 569-598.
18. Holmes, D.I. (1994). Authorship attribution. Computers and the Humanities, 28(2), 87-106.
19. Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23, 215-239.
20. Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.
22. Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.
23. Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39-64.
24. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Ivanic, R., & Simpson, J. (1992). Who's who in academic writing. In N. Fairclough (Ed.). Critical language awareness (pp. 141-173). London: Longman.
26. Juola, P., & Baayen, R.H. (2005). A controlled-corpus experiment in authorship identification by cross-entropy. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20(1), 59-67.
27. Koppel, M., Argamon, S., & Shimoni, A.R. (2002). Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17, 401-412.
28. Lawler, S. (2008). Identity: Sociological perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
29. Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave.
30. Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic linguistics: An introduction. London: Continuum.
31. Scott, M. (2004). Wordsmith Tools (version 4). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Semino, E., & Short, M.H. (2004). Corpus stylistics. London: Longman.
33. Sinclair, J. (1999). A way with common words. In: H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell, (Eds.), Out of corpora (pp. 157-179) Amsterdam: Rodopi.
34. Stubbs, M. (2005). Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and Literature, 14(1), 5-24.
35. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Swales, J. (1998). Other floors, other voices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Swales, J. (2009). Incidents in an educational life: A memoir (of sorts). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2004) Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40. Vel, D.O., Corney, M., Anderson, A., & Mohay, G. (2002, August 6-8). Language and gender author cohort analysis of e-mail for computer forensics. In Second digital forensics research workshop, Syracuse, NY.
41. Wertsch, J. 1991. Voices of the mind: A Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.