Concession relations as argumentation

Text

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 301-316

  Azar, Moshe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Concessivity; Discourse analysis; Rhetorical relation

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244229355     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.1.1997.17.3.301     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abelen, E., Redeker, G., and Thompson, S. A. (1993). The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters. Text 13 (3): 323-350
2. Angeles, P. A. (1981). A Dictionary of Philosophy, New York: Barnes and Noble
3. Anscombre, J.-C. (1989). Théorie de l'argumentation, topoï, et struturation discursive. Revue québécoise de linguistique 18 (1): 13-56
4. Anscombre, J.-C. and Ducrot, O. (1977). Deux mais en français?, Lingua 43 (1): 23-40
5. Azar, M. (1995). Argumentative texts in newspapers. In Reconstruction and Application. Proceedings of the Third ISSUE Conference on Argumentation (University of Amsterdam, June 21-24, 1994). Frans H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), 493-500. Amsterdam: Sic Sat
6. Barton, E. L. (1995). Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives metadiscourse functions in argumentation. Written Communication 12 (2): 219-239
7. Blair, A. J. (1992). Everyday argumentation from an informal logic perspective. In Readings in Argumentation, W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds.), 357-376. Berlin-New York: Foris
8. Chittleborough, P. and Newman, M. E. (1993). Defining the term 'argument'. Informal Logic, 15 (3): 189-207
9. Ducrot, O. (1992). Argumentation et persuasion. In Enonciation et parti pris. Actes du colloque de l'Université d'Anvers (5, 6, 7 Fevrier 1990). W. De Mulder, F. Schuerewegen, and L. Tasmowski (eds.), 143-158. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V
10. Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., and Kruiger, T. (1987). Handbook of Argumentation Theory: A Critical Survey of Classical Backgrounds and Modern Studies. Dordrecht: Foris
11. König, E. (1991). Concessive relations as the dual of causal relations. In Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics, D. Zaefferer (ed.), 190-207. Berlin-New York: Foris
12. Mann, W, C., Matthiessen, C., and Thompson, S. A. (1992). Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fun-Raising Text, W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 39-78. Amsterdam: Benjamins
13. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. (1986). Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57-90
14. - (1987). Rhetorical structural theory: A theory of text organization. ISI/RS Report 87-190 (Information Science Institute)
15. - (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8 (3): 243-281
16. Matthiessen, C. and Thompson, S. A. (1988). The structure of discourse and 'subordination'. In Clause Combing in Grammar and Discourse, J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 275-330. Amsterdam: Benjamins
17. Robrieux, J-J. (1993). Eléments de rhétorique et d'argumentation. Paris: Dunod