The brain in time: Insights from neuromagnetic recordings

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1191, Issue , 2010, Pages 89-109

  Hari, Riitta ^a   Parkkonen, Lauri ^a,b   Nangini, Cathy ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b Bât 145 ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Brain; Cortical processing; Hierarchy; Magnetoencephalography; MEG; Temporal scale

Indexed keywords

BINAURAL HEARING; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMITATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CONDUCTION; OSCILLATION; PERCEPTION; REVIEW; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

EID: 77950210162     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05438.x     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Hämäläinen, M., R. Hari, R. Ilmoniemi, et al. 1993. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev. Modern Phys. 65: 413-497.
2. Hari, R., S. Levänen & T. Raij. 2000. Timing of human cortical activation sequences during cognition: role of MEG. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4: 455-462.
3. König, P., A.K. Engel & W. Singer. 1996. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci. 19: 130-137.
4. Singer, W. 2009. Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks. Cogn. Neurodyn. 3: 189-196
5. Aladjalova, N. 1957. Infra-slow rhythmic osciallations of the steady potential of the cerebral cortex. Nature 179: 957-959.
6. Vanhatalo, S., J.M. Palva, M.D. Holmes, et al. 2004. Infraslow oscillations modulate excitability and interictal epileptic activity in the human cortex during sleep. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 5053-5057.
7. Forss, N., T. Raij, M. Seppä & R. Hari. 2005. Common cortical network for first and second pain. Neuroimage 24: 132-142.
8. Aboitiz, F.,A. Scheibel, R. Fisher & E.Zaidel. 1992. Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res. 598: 143-153.
9. Barth, D., W. Sutherling, J.J. Engel & J. Beatty. 1982. Neuromagnetic localization of epileptiform spike activity in the human brain. Science 218: 891-894.
10. Hari, R., A. Ahonen, N. Forss, et al. 1993. Parietal epileptic mirror focus detected with a whole-head neuromagnetometer. NeuroReport 5: 45-48.
11. Forss, N., J.P. Mäkelä, T. Keränen & R. Hari. 1995. Trigeminally triggered epileptic facial convulsions. NeuroReport 6: 918-920.
12. Schmolesky, M.T., Y. Wang, D.P. Hanes, et al. 1998. Signal timing across the macaque visual system. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 3272-3278.
13. Nishitani, N. & R. Hari. 2002. Viewing lip forms: cortical dynamics. Neuron 36: 1211-1220.
14. Yamashita, Y. & J. Tani. 2008. Emergence of functional hierarchy in amultiple timescale neural network model: a humanoid robot experiment. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4: 1-18.
15. Kiebel, S.J., J. Daunizeau & K.J. Friston. 2008. A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4: 1-12.
16. Friston, K., J. Kilner & L. Harrison. 2006. A free energy principle for the brain. J. Physiol. Paris 100: 70-87.
17. Sherman, S.&R.Guillery. 1998.Onthe actions that one nerve cell can have on another: distinguishing "drivers" from"modulators. "Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.USA95: 7121-7126.
18. Hasson, U., E. Yang, I. Vallines, et al. 2008. A hierarchy of temporal receptivewindows in human cortex. J. Neurosci. 28: 2539-2550.
19. Mäkelä, J.P., A. Ahonen, M. Hämäläinen, et al. 1993. Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole-head neuromagnetic recordings. Human Brain Mapp. 1: 48-56.
20. Giraud,A., A. Kleinschmidt,D. Poeppel, et al. 2007. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 56: 1127-1134.
21. Hari, R. 1995. Illusory directional hearing in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 189: 29-30.
22. Hari, R. & P.Kiesilä. 1996. Deficit of temporal auditory processing in dyslexic adults. Neurosci. Lett. 205: 138-140.
23. Merzenich, M., W. Jenkins, P. Johnston, et al. 1996. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science 271: 77-81.
24. Hari, R. & H. Renvall. 2001. Impaired processing of rapid stimulus sequences in dyslexia. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5: 525-532.
25. Kaufman, L.&J. Thomas. 1986.Handbook of Perception & Human Perception,Wiley-Interscience. New York.
26. Hari, R., M. Valta & K. Uutela. 1999. Prolonged attentional dwell time in dyslexic adults. Neurosci. Lett. 271: 202-204.
27. Hari, R. & M.V. Kujala. 2009. Brain basis of human social interaction: from concepts to brain imaging. Physiol. Rev. 89: 453-479.
28. Erńe, S., G. Curio, L. Trahms, et al. 1988. Magnetic activity of a single peripheral nerve in man. In Biomagnetism '87. K. Atsumi, et al., Eds.: 166-169. Tokyo Denki University Press. Tokyo.
29. Hari, R., J. Hällström, J. Tiihonen & S.L. Joutsiniemi. 1989. Multichannel detection of magnetic compound action fields ofmedian and ulnar nerves. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72: 277-280.
30. Bernander, O., R. Douglas, K.Martin & C. Koch. 1991. Synaptic background activity influences spatiotemporal integration in single pyramidal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11569-11573.
31. Murakami, S. & Y.Okada. 2006. Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals. J. Physiol. 575: 925-936.
32. Hari, R. 1990. The neuromagneticmethod in the study of the human auditory cortex. In Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Advances in Audiology, Vol.6. F. Grandori, M. Hoke & G. Romani, Eds.: 222-282. Karger. Basel.
33. Ahonen,A.I., M.S.Hämäläinen,M.J.Kajola, et al. 1993. 122-channel SQUID instrument for investigating the magnetic signals from the human brain. Phys. Scripta. T49: 198-205.
34. Erńe, S.N., H.J. Scheer, M. Hoke, et al. 1987. Brainstem auditory evoked magnetic fields in response to stimulation with brief tone pulses. Int. J. Neurosci. 37: 115-125.
35. Parkkonen, L., N. Fujiki & J.P. Mäkelä. 2009. Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography. Human Brain Mapp. 30: 1772-1782.
36. Curio, G., B. Mackert, M. Burghoff, et al. 1994. Localization of evoked neuromagnetic 600 Hz activity in the cerebral somatosensory system. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 91: 483-487.
37. Mackert, B. 2004. The discovery of slowness-recent progress in DC-MEG research. Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol. 41: 1-6.
38. Hari, R., K. Aittoniemi, M.L. Järvinen, et al. 1980. Auditory evoked transient and sustained magnetic fields of the human brain. Localization of neural generators. Exp. Brain Res. 40: 237-240.
39. Leistner, S., T. Sander, M. Wachs, et al. 2009. Differential infraslow (<0.1 Hz) cortical activations in the affected and unaffected hemispheres from patients with subacute stroke demonstrated by noninvasive DC-magnetoencephalography. Stroke. 40:1683-1686
40. Baillet, S., J.Mosher & R. Leahy. 2001. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Proc. Magaz. 40: 14-30.
41. Sarvas, J. 1987. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32: 11-22.
42. Hämäläinen, M. & J. Sarvas. 1989. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Eng 36: 165-171.
43. Hari, R., T. Nagamine, N. Nishitani, et al. 1996. Timevarying activation of different cytoarchitectonic areas of the human SI cortex after tibial nerve stimulation. Neuroimage 4: 111-118.
44. Mosher, J.C., S. Baillet & R.M. Leahy. 1999. EEG source localization and imaging using multiple signal classification approaches. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16: 225-238.
45. Sorrentino, A., L. Parkkonen, A. Pascarella, et al. 2009. Dynamical MEG source modeling with multitarget Bayesian filtering.Human BrainMapp. 30: 1911-1921.
46. Hämäläinen, M. & R. Ilmoniemi. 1994. Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum normestimates. Med. Biol. Engin. Comput. 32: 35-42.
47. Matsuura, K. & Y. Okabe. 1995. Selective minimumnorm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin. 42: 608-615.
48. Uutela, K., M.Hämäläinen & E. Somersalo. 1999. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. Neuroimage 10: 173-180.
49. Dale, A.M., A.K. Liu, B.R. Fischl, et al. 2000. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26: 55-67.
50. Hillebrand, A., K.D. Singh, I.E. Holliday, et al. 2005. A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography. Human Brain Mapp. 25: 199-211.
51. Laaksonen, H., J. Kujala & R. Salmelin. 2008. Amethod for spatiotemporal mapping of event-related modulation of cortical rhythmic activity. Neuroimage 42: 207-217.
52. Sekihara, K., S.S. Nagarajan, D. Poeppel, et al. 2001. Reconstructing spatio-temporal activities of neural sources using an MEG vector beamformer technique. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engin. 48: 760-771.
53. Mosher, J.C., S. Baillet&R.M. Leahy. 2003. Equivalence of linear approaches in bioelectromagnetic inverse solutions. In Statistical Signal Processing, 2003 IEEE Workshop, Sep 28-Oct 1, 2003, St. Louis, Missouri, USA 294-297.
54. Tesche, C.D. 1997. Non-invasive detection of ongoing neuronal population activity in normal human hippocampus. Brain Res. 749: 53-60.
55. Hari, R. 2004. Magnetoencephalography in clinical neurophysiological assessment of human cortical functions. In Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. E. Niedermeyer, & F. Lopes da Silva, Eds.: 1165-1197. Lippincott,Williams &Wilkins. Philadelphia, PA.
56. Taulu, S., M. Kajola & J. Simola. 2004. Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method. Brain Topogr. 16: 269-275.
57. Taulu, S. & R. Hari. 2009. Removal of magnetoencephalographic artifacts with temporal signal-space separation: demonstration with single-trial auditory evoked responses. Human BrainMapp. 30: 1524-1534.
58. Bandettini, P.A. 2009. What's new in neuroimaging methods. The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience,. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1156: 260-293.
59. Hari, R. 1988. Interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields elicited by somatosensory stimuli. In Springer Series of BrainDynamics,Vol. 1. E. Basar, Ed.: 305-310. Springer Verlag. Berlin-Heidelberg.
60. Nangini,C., B.MacIntosh, F. Tam, et al. 2005. Assessing linear time-invariance in human primary somatosensory cortex with BOLD fMRI using vibrotactile stimuli. Magn. Reson. Med. 53: 304-311.
61. Nangini, C., Y. Hlushchuk & R. Hari. 2009. Predicting stimulus-rate sensitivity of human somatosensory fMRI signals with MEG.Human BrainMapp. 30: 1824-1832.
62. Ances, B.M., E. Zarahn, J.H. Greenberg & J.A. Detre. 2000. Coupling of neural activation to blood flow in the somatosensory cortex of rats is time-intensity separable, but not linear. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 20: 921-930.
63. Franceschini,M., I.Nissilä,W.Wu, et al. 2008.Coupling between somatosensory evoked potentials and hemodynamic response. Neuroimage 41: 189-203.
64. Logothetis, N.K., J. Pauls, M. Augath, et al. 2001. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412: 150-157.
65. Bar, M., R. Tootell, D. Schacter, et al. 2001. Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition. Neuron 29: 529-535.
66. Bar, M., K.S. Kassam, A.S. Ghuman, et al. 2006. Topdown facilitation of visual recognition. Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci. USA 103: 449-454.
67. Furey, M., T. Tanskanen, M. Beauchamp, et al. 2006. Dissociation of face selective cortical responses by attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 1065-1070.
68. Raichle, M.E. & M.A. Mintun. 2006. Brain work and brain imaging. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29: 449-476.
69. Mantini, D., M.G. Perrucci, C. Del Gratta, et al. 2007. Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 13170-13175.
70. Hari,R.&R. Salmelin. 1997.Humancortical rhythms: a neuromagnetic view through the skull. TrendsNeurosci. 20: 44-49.
71. Schnitzler, A., S. Salenius, R. Salmelin, et al. 1997. Involvement of primary motor cortex in motor imagery: a neuromagnetic study. Neuroimage 6: 201-208.
72. Tiihonen, J., R.Hari,M.Kajola, et al. 1991.Magnetoencephalographic 10-Hz rhythm from the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 129: 303-305.
73. Lehtelä, L., R. Salmelin & R. Hari. 1997. Evidence for reactive magnetic 10-Hz rhythmin the human auditory cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 222: 111-114.
74. Narici, L., N. Forss, V. Jousmäki, et al. 2001. Evidence for a 7-to 9-Hz 'sigma' rhythmin the human SII cortex. Neuroimage 13: 662-668.
75. Steriade, M., A. Nunez & F. Amzica. 1993. Intracellular analysis of relations between the slow.
76. Canolty, R.T., E. Edwards, S.S. Dalal, et al. 2006. High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313: 1626-1628.
77. Jensen, O. & L. Colgin. 2007. Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11: 267-269
78. Lakatos, P.,A. Shah, K.Knuth, et al. 2005.An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 94: 1904-1911.
79. Muthukumaraswamy, S., R. Edden,D. Jones, et al. 2009. Resting GABA concentration predicts peak gamma frequency and fMRI amplitude in response to visual stimulation inhumans.Proc.Natl.Acad. Sci.USA106: 8356-8361.
80. Börgers, C. & N. Kopell. 2003. Synchronization in networks of excitatoryand inhibitory neurons with sparse, random connectivity. Neural Comput. 15: 509-538.
81. Jensen, O. & C. Tesche. 2002. Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15: 1395-1399.
82. Wyart, V. & C. Tallon-Baudry. 2009. How ongoing fluctuations in human visual cortex predict perceptual awareness: baseline shift versus decision bias. J. Neurosci. 29: 8715-8725.
83. Schnitzler, A. & J. Gross. 2005. Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6: 285-296.
84. Schnitzler, A., C.Munks, M. Butz, et al. 2009. Synchronized brain network associated with essential tremor as revealed by magnetoencephalography. Mov. Disord. 24: 1629-1635.
85. Salenius, S., S. Avikainen, S. Kaakkola, et al. 2001. Defective cortical drive to muscle in Parkinson's disease and its improvement with levodopa. Brain 125: 491-500.
86. Caetano, G., V. Jousmäki & R. Hari. 2007. Actor's and viewer's primarymotor cortices stabilize similarly after seen or heard motor actions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 9058-9062.
87. Longcamp, M., T. Tanskanen & R. Hari. 2006. The imprint of action: motor cortex involvement in visual perception of handwritten letters. Neuroimage. 33: 681-688.
88. Conway, B.,D.Halliday, S. Farmer, et al. 1995. Synchronization between motor cortex and spinal motoneuronal pool during the performance of a maintained motor task in man. J. Physiol. 489: 917-924.
89. Salenius, S., K. Portin, M. Kajola, et al. 1997. Cortical control of human motoneuron firing during isometric contraction. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 3401-3405.
90. Gross, J., L. Timmermann, J. Kujala, et al. 2002. The neural basis of intermittent motor control in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 2299-2302.
91. Gross, J., P.A. Tass, S. Salenius, et al. 2000. Corticomuscular synchronization during isometric muscle contraction in humans as revealed by magnetoencephalography. J. Physiol. 527: 623-631.
92. Salenius, S., K. Portin, M. Kajola, et al. 1997. Cortical control of human motoneuron firing during isometric contraction. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 3401-3405.
93. Kilner, J.M., S.N. Baker, S. Salenius, et al. 2000.Human cortical muscle coherence is directly related to specific motor parameters. J. Neurosci. 20: 8838-8845.
94. Siĺen, T., N. Forss, O. Jensen & R. Hari. 2000. Abnormal reactivity of the 20-Hzmotor cortex rhythm in Univerricht-Lundborg type progresssive myoclonus epilepsy. Neuroimage 12: 707-717.
95. Siĺen, T., N. Forss, S. Salenius, et al. 2002. Oscillatory cortical drive to isometrically contracting muscle in Unverricht-Lundborg type progressive myoclonus epilepsy (ULD). Clin. Neurophysiol. 113: 1973-1979.
96. Gross, J., J.Kujala, M.Hämäläinen, et al. 2001. Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 694-699.
97. Schnitzler, A. & J. Gross. 2005. Functional connectivity analysis in magnetoencephalography. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 68: 173-195.
98. Simões, C., O. Jensen, L. Parkkonen & R. Hari. 2003. Phase locking between human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 2691-2694.
99. Nolte, G., A. Ziehe, V.V. Nikulin, et al. 2008. Robustly estimating the flowdirection of information in complex physical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100: 1-4.
100. McEvoy, L., J.P. Mäkelä, M. Hämäläinen & R. Hari. 1994. Effect of interaural time differences on middlelatency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hear. Res. 78: 249-257.
101. Mäkelä, J. & R. Hari. 1987. Evidence for cortical origin of the 40-Hz auditory evoked response in man. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 66: 539-546.
102. Hari, R. & J.P.Mäkelä. 1986. Neuromagnetic responses to frequency modulation of a continuous tone. Acta Otolaryngol. 432(Suppl): 26-32.
103. Brenner, D., J. Lipton, L. Kaufman & S. Williamson. 1978. Somatically evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 199: 81-83.
104. Romani, G.L., S.J. Williamson & L. Kaufman. 1982. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 216: 1339-1340.
105. Hari, R., M.Hämäläinen&S.L. Joutsiniemi. 1989.Neuromagnetic steady-state responses to auditory stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86: 1033-1039.
106. Simpson, M.I., G.R. Barnes, S.R. Johnson, et al. 2009. MEG evidence that the central auditory system simultaneously encodes multiple temporal cues. Eur. J. Neurosci. 30: 1183-1191.
107. Buiatti,M., M. Pena&G.Dehaene-Lambertz. 2009. Investigating the neural correlates of continuous speech computation with frequency-tagged neuroelectric responses. Neuroimage 44: 509-519.
108. Fujiki,N., V. Jousmäki &R.Hari. 2002.Neuromagnetic responses to frequency-tagged sounds: a new method to follow inputs from each ear to the human auditory cortex during binaural hearing. J. Neurosci. 22: 1-4, RC205.
109. Kaneko, K., N. Fujiki & R. Hari. 2003. Binaural interaction in the human auditory cortex revealed by neuromagnetic frequency tagging: no effect of stimulus intensity. Hear. Res. 183: 1-6.
110. Parkkonen, L., J. Andersson, M.Hämäläinen & R.Hari. 2008. Early visual brain areas reflect the percept of an ambiguous scene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 20500-20504.
111. Uusitalo,M., S.Williamson &M. Seppä. 1996. Dynamical organisation of the human visual system revealed by lifetimes of activation traces. Neurosci. Lett. 213: 149-156.
112. Uusitalo, M., V. Jousmäki & R. Hari. 1997. Activation trace lifetime of human cortical responses evoked by apparent visual motion. Neurosci. Lett. 224: 45-48.
113. Hari, R., K. Kaila, T. Katila, et al. 1982. Interstimulusinterval dependence of the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 54: 561-569.
114. Hari, R., J. Karhu, M. Hämäläinen, et al. 1993. Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices: a neuromagnetic study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 5: 724-734.
115. Tiihonen, J., R. Hari & M. Hämäläinen. 1989. Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 74: 290-296.
116. Schnitzler, A., J. Volkmann, P. Enck, et al. 1999. Different cortical organization of visceral and somatic sensation in humans. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11: 305-315.
117. Kettenmann, B., V. Jousmäki, K. Portin, et al. 1996. Odorants activate the human superior temporal sulcus. Neurosci. Lett. 203: 143-145.
118. Näätänen, R. & K. Alho. 1997. Mismatch negativity-themeasure for central sound representation accuracy. Audiol. Neuro-otol. 2: 341-353.
119. May, P. & H. Tiitinen. 2010. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiol. 47: 66-122.
120. Garrido, M.I., K.J. Friston, S.J. Kiebel, et al. 2008. The functional anatomy of the MMN: a DCM study of the roving paradigm. Neuroimage 42: 936-944.
121. Kutas, M. & S.A. Hillyard. 1980. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207: 203-205.
122. Service, E., P. Helenius, S. Maury & R. Salmelin. 2007. Localization of syntactic and semantic brain responses using magnetoencephalography. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19: 1193-1205.
123. Raij, T., L. McEvoy, J. Mäkelä & R. Hari. 1997. Human auditory cortex is activated by omissions of auditory stimuli. Brain Res. 745: 134-143.
124. Martikainen, M.H., K.I. Kaneko & R. Hari. 2005. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 15: 299-302.
125. Curio, G., G. Neuloh, J. Numminen, et al. 2000. Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex. Human Brain Mapp. 9: 183-191.
126. Hesse, M., N. Nishitani, G. Fink, et al. 2009. Attenuation of somatosensory responses to self-produced tactile stimulation. Cereb. Cortex. 20: 425-432.
127. Lauronen, L., P. Nevalainen, H. Wikström, et al. 2006. Immaturity of somatosensory cortical processing in human newborns. Neuroimage 33: 195-203.
128. Pihko, E., P.Nevalainen, J. Stephen, et al. 2009.Maturation of somatosensory cortical processing from birth to adulthood revealed by magnetoencephalography. Clin. Neurophysiol. 120: 1552-1561.
129. Wikström, H., J. Huttunen, A. Korvenoja, et al. 1996. Effects of interstimulus interval on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs): a hypothesis concerning SEF generation at the primary sensorimotor cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 100: 479-487.
130. Ben-Ari, Y., E. Cherubini, R. Corradetti & J.L. Gaiarsa. 1989. Giant synaptic potentials in immature rat CA3 hippocampal neurones. J. Physiol. 416: 303-325.
131. Parviainen, T., P. Helenius, E. Poskiparta, et al. 2006. Cortical sequence of word perception in beginning readers. J. Neurosci. 26: 6052-6061.
132. Vanni, S., T. Tanskanen, M. Seppä, et al. 2001. Coinciding early activation of the human primary visual cortex and anteromedial cuneus. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci.USA 98: 2776-2780.
133. Garraghty, P.E., S.L. Florence, W.N. Tenhula & J.H. Kaas. 1991. Parallel thalamic activation of the first and second somatosensory areas in prosimian primates and tree shrews. J. Comp. Neurol. 311: 289-299.
134. Pons,T.P., P.E. Garraghty,D.P. Friedman&M.Mishkin. 1987. Physiological evidence for serial processing in somatosensory cortex. Science 237: 417-420.
135. Hari, R. & N. Forss. 1999. Magnetoencephalalography in the study of human somatosensory cortical processing. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 354: 1145-1154.
136. Ploner, M., F. Schmitz, H.J. Freund & A. Schnitzler. 1999. Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing. J.Neurophysiol. 81: 3100-3104.
137. Raij, T., N. Vartiainen, V. Jousmäki & R. Hari. 2003. Effects of interstimulus interval on cortical responses to painful laser stimulation. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 20: 73-79.
138. Nishitani, N., S. Avikainen & R. Hari. 2004. Abnormal imitation-related cortical activation sequences in Asperger's syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 55: 558-562.
139. Nishitani, N. & R. Hari. 2000. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 913-918.
140. Rizzolatti, G. & L. Craighero. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27: 169-192.
141. Biermann-Ruben, K., K. Kessler, M. Jonas, et al. 2008. Right hemisphere contributions to imitation tasks. Eur. J. Neurosci. 27: 1843-1855.
142. Kilner, J.M., K.J. Friston & C.D. Frith. 2007. Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn. Process. 8: 159-166.
143. Kominis, I., T. Kornack, J. Allred & M. Romalis. 2003. A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer. Nature 422: 596-599.
144. Pannetier,M., C. Fermon, G. Le Goff, et al. 2004. Femtotesla magnetic fieldmeasurement with magnetoresistive sensors. Science 304: 1648-1650.
145. Clarke, J., M. Hatridge & M. Mossle. 2007. SQUIDdetected magnetic resonance imaging in microtesla fields. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9: 389-413.
146. Johnson, A., A. Fenton, C. Kentros & A. Redish. 2009. Looking for cognition in the structure within the noise. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13: 55-64.
147. Ramkumar, P., L. Parkkonen & R. Hari. 2010. Oscillatory response function: towards a parametric model of rhythmic brain activity. Human Brain Mapp. in press.
148. Ishai, A., L.G. Ungerleider, A. Martin, et al. 1999. Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9379-9384
149. Kamitani, Y. & F. Tong. 2006. Decoding seen and attended motion directions from activity in the human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 16: 1096-1102
150. Miyawaki, Y., H. Uchida, O. Yamashita, et al. 2008. Visual image reconstruction fromhuman brain activity using a combination ofmultiscale local image decoders. Neuron 60: 915-929.
151. Kay, K.N., T.Naselaris, R.J. Prenger&J.L.Gallant. 2008. Identifying natural images from human brain activity. Nature 452: 352-1325
152. Mitchell, T.M., S.V. Shinkareva, A. Carlson, et al. 2008. Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns. Science 320: 1191-1195.
153. Georgopoulos, A.P., F.J.P. Langheim, A.C. Leuthold & A.N. Merkle. 2005. Magnetoencephalographic signals predict movement trajectory in space. Exp. Brain Res. 167: 132-135.
154. Waldert, S., H. Preissl, E. Demandt, et al. 2008. Hand movement direction decoded from MEG and EEG. J. Neurosci. 28: 1000-1008.
155. Jacobs, J. & M. Kahana. 2009.Neural representations of individual stimuli in humans revealed by gamma-band electrocorticographic activity. J. Neurosci. 29: 10203-10214.