EEG source localization and imaging using multiple signal classification approaches

Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 225-238

  Mosher, John C ^a   Baillet, Sylvain ^b   Leahy, Richard M ^b  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Current dipole source models; Electroencephalography; Image reconstruction; Magnetoencephalography; MUSIC (multiple signal classification); Source localization

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; BRAIN MAPPING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD;

EID: 0033060175     PISSN: 07360258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199905000-00004     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Baillet S, Garnero L. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997;44:374-85.
2. Brenner D, Lipton J, Kaufman L, Williamson SJ. Somatically evoked magnetic fields of the human brain. Science 1978;199:81-3.
3. Cohen D, Cuffin BN. Demonstrations of useful differences between magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1983;56:38-51.
4. Cuffin BN. Effects of measurement errors and noise on MEG moving dipole inverse solutions. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 1986;33: 854-61.
5. Cuffin BN. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 1990;37:44-52.
6. Cuffin BN. Eccentric spheres models of the head. IEEE Trans Biomed Engr 1991;38:871-8.
7. Cuffin BN, Cohen D. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1979;47: 132-46.
8. Dale AM, Sereno MI. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction - a linear-approach. J Cog NeuroSci 1993;5:162-76
9. de Munck JC, van Dijk BW, Spekreijse H. Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity, IEEE Trans Biomedical Engineering 1988;35:960-6.
10. George JS, Aine CJ, Mosher JC, Schmidt DM, Ranken DM, Schlitt HA, Wood CC, Lewine JD, Sanders JA, Belliveau JW. Mapping function in the human brain with magnetoencephalography, anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Neurophysiol 1995;12:406-31.
11. Golub G, Van Loan C. Matrix computations, 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.
12. Gorodnitsky IR, George J, Rao BD. Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995;95:231-51.
13. Hochwald B, Nehorai A. Magnetoencephalography with diversely oriented and multicomponent sensors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997;44:40-50.
14. Huang M, Aine C, Weisend M, Stephen J, Mosher J, Leahy R, Meyer J, Christner R, Silveri J. Pre- and post-central sulcal sources evoked by stimulating the median nerve and index finger: are pre-central sulcal sources due to passive muscle movement? Biomag98, Sendai, Japan, September 1998 (in press).
15. Huang MX, Mosher JC, Leahy RM. Sensor weighted overlapping sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:423-40.
16. Ilmoniemi RJ, Hämäläinen MS. Helsinki University of Technology Report TKK-F-A559, 1984.
17. Ioannides AA, Bolton JPR, Clarke CJS. Continuous Probabilistic Solutions to the Biomagnetic Inverse Problem. Inverse Problems 1990;6:523-42.
18. Iwaki S, Nakagawa S, Ueno S. Estimation of distributed sources of visually evoked magnetic fields associated with word recognition [abstract]. NeuroImage 1996;3:S225.
19. Kaufman L. Perception and event-related potentials and fields. In: Williamson SJ, Romani GL, Kaufman L, Modena I, eds. Biomagnetism, an Interdisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1983:385-98.
20. Krim H, Viberg M. Two decades of array signal processing research: the parametric approach. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 1996; 13(4):67-94.
21. Leahy RM, Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Huang MX, Lewine JD. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroenceph Clin Neurophys 1998;107:159-73.
22. Liu AK, Belliveau JW, Dale AM. Spatiotemporal imaging of human brain activity using functional MRI-constrained magnetoencephalography data - Monte-Carlo Simulations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1998;95:8945-50.
23. Luetkenhoener B, Greenblatt R, Hamalainen M, Mosher J, Scherg M, Tesche C, Valdes Sosa P. Comparison between different approaches to the biomagnetic inverse problem - workshop report, (invited participation). In: Aine CJ, Flynn ER, Okada Y, Stroink G, Swithenby SJ, Wood CC, eds. Biomag96: Advances in Biomagnetism Research. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
24. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 1992;39:541-57.
25. Mosher JC, Spencer ME, Leahy RM, Lewis PS. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1993;86:303-321.
26. Mosher JC, Lewis PS, Leahy RM. Coherence and MUSIC in biomagnetic source localization. In: Baumgartner C, Deecke L, Stroink G, Williamson SJ, eds. Biomagnetism: Fundamental Research and Clinical Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier/IOS Press, 1995: 330-4.
27. Mosher JC, Leahy RM. Recursive MUSIC: a framework for EEG and MEG source localization. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998;45: 1342-54.
28. Mosher JC, Leahy RM. Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC. IEEE Trans Signal Proc 1999;47: 332-40.
29. Mosher JC, Leahy RM, Lewis PS. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans Biomedical Eng 1999a;46:245-59.
30. Mosher JC, Leahy RM, Shattuck DW, Baillet S. MEG source imaging using multipolar expansions. Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, IPMI99. Hungary, June 1999b (in press).
31. Okada Y. Neurogenesis of evoked magnetic fields. In: Williamson SJ, Romani GL, Kaufman L, Modena I, eds. Biomagnetism, an Interdisciplinary Approach. New York: Plenum Press, 1983:399-408.
32. Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D. Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: A new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. In J Psychopsych 1994;18:49-65.
33. Phillips J, Leahy RM, Mosher JC. MEG-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:338-48.
34. Radich B, Buckley K. EEG dipole localization bounds and MAP algorithms for head models with parameter uncertainties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995;42:233-41.
35. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys Med Biol 1987;32:11-22.
36. Scherg M, von Cramon D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985;62:32-44.
37. Scherg M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: Hoke M, Grandori F, Romani GL, eds. Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Potentials. Basel: Karger, 1989. (Advances in audiology, vol 6.)
38. Schmidt RO. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagation 1986;vol AP-34:276-80. Reprint of the original 1979 paper from the RADC Spectrum Estimation Workshop.
39. Schmidt DM, George JS, Wood CC. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Hum Brain Mapping 1999;7: 195-212.
40. Sekihara K, Hideaki H, Ohyama N. Parameter estimation of multiple biomagentic current dipoles using simulated annealing. In: Gmitro AF, et al., eds. Digital Image Synthesis and Inverse Optics. Proceedings SPIE San Diego, July, 1990;1351:410-6.
41. Sekihara K, Miyauchi S, Koizumi H. Covariance incorporated MEG-MUSIC algorithm and its application to detect SI and SII when large background brain activity exists [abstract]. Neurolmage 1996;3:S92.
42. Shaw JC, Roth M. Potential distribution analysis I: a new technique for the analysis of electophysiological phenomena. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1955a;273-84.
43. Soong ACK, Koles ZJ. Principal-component localization of the sources of the background EEG. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995;42:59-67.
44. Sorenson HW. Parameter estimation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1995.
45. Stok CJ. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987;34:289-96.
46. Wang JZ, Williamson SJ, Kaufman L. Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992;39:665-75.
47. Wood CC. Application of dipole localization methods to source identification of human evoked potentials. Ann NY Acad Science 1982;388:139-55.
48. Zhang Z. A fast method to compute surface potentials generated by dipoles within multilayer anisotropic spheres. Phys Med Biol 1995;40:335-49.