Examining the relationship between students' mathematics test scores and computer use at home and at school

Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1-45

  O'Dwyer, Laura M ^a   Russell, Michael ^a   Bebell, Damian ^a   Seeley, Kevon ^a  

^a BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849128752     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15402525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New evidence on classroom computers and pupil learning. The Economic Journal, 112, 735-765.
2. Bausell, C.V., & Klemick, E. (2007, October). Tracking U.S. Trends. Education Week, 26(30), p. 42-44.
3. Bebell, D., Russell, H., & O'Dwyer, L.M. (2004). Measuring teachers' technology uses: Why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
4. Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P.K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools. Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED412893).
5. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., Emery, D., & Sussex, W. (2007). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
7. Fletcher-Flinn, C.M., & Gravatt, B. (1995). The efficacy of computer assisted instruction (CAI): A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(3), 219-242.
8. Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1). Available from http://www/jtla.org
9. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold.
10. Haney, W (1980). Units and levels of analysis in large-scale evaluation. New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 1-15.
11. Hedges, L.V., Konstantopoulis, S., & Thoreson, A. (2003). Computer Use and Its Relation to Academic Achievement in Mathematics, Reading and Writing. NAEP Validity Studies. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (ED).
12. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Kulik, J.A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia story: Achievement gains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Retrieved December 1, 2003, from http://www.mff.org/ publications/publications.taf?page=155
15. Market Data Retrieval. (2001). Technology in education 2001. Shelton, CT: Author.
16. O'Dwyer, L.M., Russell. M., Bebell, D. (2004, September 14). Identifying teacher, school and district characteristics associated with elementary teachers' use of technology: A multilevel perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(48). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n48/.
17. O'Dwyer, L.M., Russell. M., Bebell, D., & Tucker-Seeley, K. (2005). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students' English/language arts test scores. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(3). Available from http://www.jtla.org
18. Penuel, B., Yarnall, L., & Simkins, M. (2000, September). Do technology investments pay off? The evidence is in! [Electronic version]. Leadership, v30 p. 18.
19. Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications. Russell,
20. M., O'Dwyer, L.M., Bebell, D., 8t Miranda, H. (2003). The USEITstudy technical report. Boston, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative.
21. Sivin-Kachala, J., & Bialo, E.R. (1994). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1994. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 726)
22. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.