The influence of frequency and semantic similarity on how children learn grammar

First Language

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 79-101

  Abbot Smith, Kirsten ^a   Tomasello, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Frequency; Miniature language; Verb argument structure learning; Verb semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949934943     PISSN: 01427237     EISSN: 17402344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0142723709350525     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2004). Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: The role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution. Developmental Science, 7, 48-55
2. Abbot-Smith, K., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Graded representations in the acquisition of English and German transitive constructions. Cognitive Development, 23, 48-66
3. Ambridge, B., Pine, J., Rowland, C., & Young, C. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on childreng's and adultsg' graded judgments of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106, 87-129
4. Bolander, M. (1989). Prefabs, patterns and rules in interaction? Formulaic speech in adult learnersg' L2 Swedish. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. Boyd, J., & Goldberg, A.E. (in press). Childreng's failure to generalise when exposed to the same input as adults and its benefits in language learning. Lingua
6. Braine, M.D.S. (1963). The ontogeny of English phrase structure - the 1st Phase. Language, 39, 1-13
7. Braine, M.D.S., Brody, R.E., Fisch, S.M., Weisberger, M.J., & Blum, M. (1990). Can children use a verb without exposure to its argument structure ? Journal of Child Language, 17, 313-342
8. Brooks, P.J., & Tomasello, M. (1999). How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720-738
9. Casenhiser, D.M., & Goldberg, A.E. (2005). Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. Developmental Science, 8, 500-508
10. Childers, J.B., & Tomasello, M. (2001). The role of pronouns in young childreng's acquisition of the English transitive construction. Developmental Psychology, 37, 739-748
11. Ellis, N. (2003). Constructions, chunking and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 33-68). Oxford: Blackwell
12. Fisher, C. (1996). Structural limits on verb mapping: The role of analogy in childreng's interpretations of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 41-81
13. Fisher, C. (2002). The role of abstract syntactic knowledge in language acquisition: A reply to Tomasello (2000). Cognition, 82, 259-278
14. Flege, J., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adultsg' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527-552
15. Gentner, D., & Namy, L.L. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297-301
16. Gertner, Y., Fisher, C., & Eisengart, J. (2006). Learning words and rules: Abstract knowledge of word order in early sentence comprehension. Psychological Science, 17, 684-691
17. Gillette, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L., & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135-176
18. Gleitman, L., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J.C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 544-569
19. Goldberg, A.E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
20. Goldschneider, J., & DeKeyser, R. (2001). Explaining the 'natural order of L2 morpheme acquisitiong' in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50
21. Grimm, H. (2001). Sprachentwicklungstest fü drei- bis fünfjüCurrency signhrige Kinder. Goettingen: Hogrefe
22. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31-38
23. Hudson Kam, C.L., & Newport, E.L. (2005). Regularising unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development, 1, 151-195
24. Imai, M., Haryu, E., & Okada, H. (2005). Mapping novel nouns and verbs onto dynamic action events: Are verb meanings easier to learn than noun meanings for Japanese children ? Child Development, 76, 340-355
25. Johnson, E., & Jusczyk, P. (2001). Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 548-567
26. Johnson, J., & Newport, E.L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-90
27. Johnston, J., Blatchley, M., & Streit Olness, G. (1990). Miniature language system acquisition by children with different learning proficiencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 335-342
28. Kersten, A., & Smith, L. (2002). Attention to novel objects during verb learning. Child Development, 73, 93-109
29. Langacker, R. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmerer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: SLI Publications
30. Lieven, E. (2008). Learning the English auxiliary: A usage-based approach. In H. Behrens (Ed.), Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
31. Loucks, J., & Baldwin, D. (2006). When is a grasp a grasp? Characterizing some basic components of human action processing. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press
32. MacWhinney, B. (1983). Miniature linguistic systems as tests of the use of universal operating principles in second-language learning by children and adults. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12, 467-478
33. Matthews, D., Lieven, E., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2005). The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order. Cognitive Development, 20, 121-136
34. Meier, R., & Bower, G. (1986). Semantic reference and phrasal grouping in the acquisition of a miniature phrase structure language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 492-505
35. Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48, 323-363
36. Ninio, A. (2005). Testing the role of semantic similarity in syntactic development. Journal of Child Language, 32, 35-61
37. Papafragou, A., Cassidy, K., & Gleitman, L. (2007). When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs. Cognition, 105, 125-165
38. Pickering, M., & Branigan, H. (1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633-651
39. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 179-206
40. Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of verb-argument structure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
41. Richards, B.J. (1990). Language development and individual differences: A study of auxiliary verb learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
42. Stoll, S., Abbot-Smith, K., & Lieven, E. (2009). Lexically restricted utterances in Russian, German and English child-directed speech. Cognitive Science, 33, 75-103
43. Theakston, A. (2004). The role of entrenchment in constraining childreng's verb argument structure overgeneralisations: A grammaticality judgment study. Cognitive Development, 19, 15-34
44. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
45. Trueswell, J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 528-553
46. Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied Linguistics, 16, 180-205
47. Yorio, C. (1989). Idiomaticity as an indicator of second language proficiency. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press