Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task

Brain Research

Volumn 1325, Issue , 2010, Pages 100-111

  Chen, Youguo ^a   Huang, Xiting ^a   Luo, Yangmei ^a   Peng, Chunhua ^b   Liu, Chunxiang ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Automatic processing; Change related positivity; Cross modal delayed response; Mismatch negativity; Time perception; Visual mismatch negativity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949914822     PISSN: 00068993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.040     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Alain C., Woods D.L., and Ogawa K.H. Brain indices of automatic pattern processing. Neuroreport 6 (1994) 140-144
2. Alho K., et al. Intermodal selective attention: II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 356-368
3. Alho K., Woods D.L., and Algazi A. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 31 (1994) 469-479
4. Allan L.G. The influence of the scalar timing model on human timing research. Behav. Process. 44 (1998) 101-117
5. Bizo L.A., et al. The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production. Behav. Process. 71 (2006) 201-210
6. Bueti D., et al. Sensory and association cortex in time perception. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20 (2008) 1054-1062
7. Bueti D., et al. The role of superior temporal cortex in auditory timing. PLoS ONE 3 (2008) e2481
8. Buhusi C.V., and Meck W.H. What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6 (2005) 755-765
9. Butler R.A., et al. Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man. Psychophysiology 5 (1969) 665-672
10. Coull J.T., et al. Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation. Science 303 (2004) 1506-1508
11. Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity: violation of nonattended environmental regularities. J. Psychophysiol. 21 (2007) 224-230
12. Czigler I., and Pato L. Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity. Biol. Psychol. 80 (2009) 339-347
13. Czigler I., et al. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 39 (2002) 869-873
14. Czigler I., et al. Visual change detection: event-related potentials are dependent on stimulus location in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 364 (2004) 149-153
15. Czigler I., et al. Visual temporal window of integration as revealed by the visual mismatch negativity event-related potential to stimulus omissions. Brain Res. 1104 (2006) 129-140
16. Delorme A., and Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134 (2004) 9-21
17. Droit-Volet S., and Meck W.H. How emotions colour our perception of time. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11 (2007) 504-513
18. Droit-Volet S., et al. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults. Behav. Process. 74 (2007) 244-250
19. Fu S., et al. Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality. Psychophysiology 40 (2003) 770-775
20. Gibbon J. Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychol. Rev. 84 (1977) 279-325
21. Gibbon J. Origins of scalar timing. Learn. Motiv. 22 (1991) 3-38
22. Goldstone S., and Lhamon W.T. Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment: 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights. Percept. Mot. Skills 39 (1974) 63-82
23. Grimm S., et al. Differential processing of duration changes within short and long sounds in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 356 (2004) 83-86
24. Grimm S., et al. Mechanisms for detecting auditory temporal and spectral deviations operate over similar time windows but are divided differently between the two hemispheres. Neuroimage 32 (2006) 275-282
25. Horváth J., et al. Simultaneously active pre-attentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 12 (2001) 131-144
26. Jacobsen T., and Schröger E. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?. Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 723-727
27. Jacobsen T., and Schröger E. Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 1133-1143
28. Jacobsen T., et al. Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity. Audiol. Neurootol. 8 (2003) 338-346
29. Jaramillo M., et al. Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration. Neurosci. Lett. 290 (2000) 101-104
30. Kaukoranta E., et al. Reactions of human auditory cortex to a change in tone duration. Hear. Res. 41 (1989) 15-21
31. Kimura M., et al. Neural correlates of pre-attentive and attentive processing of visual changes. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 2061-2064
32. Kimura M., et al. Positive difference in ERPs reflects independent processing of visual changes. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 369-379
33. Kimura M., et al. Independent processing of visual stimulus changes in ventral and dorsal stream features indexed by an early positive difference in event-related brain potentials. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 59 (2006) 141-150
34. Kimura M., et al. Probability-independent and -dependent ERPs reflecting visual change detection. Psychophysiology 43 (2006) 180-189
35. Kimura M., et al. Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 67 (2008) 101-113
36. Kimura M., et al. Involvement of memory-comparison-based change detection in visual distraction. Psychophysiology 45 (2008) 445-457
37. Lewis P.A., and Miall R.C. Brain activation patterns during measurement of sub- and supra-second intervals. Neuropsychologia 41 (2003) 1583-1592
38. Lewis P.A., and Miall R.C. Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13 (2003) 250-255
39. Luo Y.J., and Wei J.H. Mismatch negativity of ERP in cross-modal attention. Sci. China C Life Sci. 40 (1997) 604-612
40. Luo Y.J., and Wei J.H. Cross-modal selective attention to visual and auditory stimuli modulates endogenous ERP components. Brain Res. 842 (1999) 30-38
41. Lustig C., and Meck W.H. Paying attention to time as one gets older. Psychol. Sci. 12 (2001) 478-484
42. Maekawa T., et al. Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 (2005) 2392-2402
43. Maekawa T., et al. Preattentive visual change detection as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN)-evidence for a memory-based process. Neurosci. Res. 65 (2009) 107-112
44. Meck W.H. Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 423 (1984) 528-541
45. Näätänen R. Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol. Bull. 92 (1982) 605-640
46. Näätänen R., and Michie P.T. Early selective-attention effects on the evoked potential: a critical review and reinterpretation. Biol. Psychol. 8 (1979) 81-136
47. Näätänen R., and Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol. Bull. 125 (1999) 826-859
48. Näätänen R., et al. Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 42 (1978) 313-329
49. Näätänen R., et al. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 (1988) 523-531
50. Näätänen R., et al. Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man?. Neurosci. Lett. 107 (1989) 347-352
51. Näätänen R., et al. Event-related potentials reveal a memory trace for temporal features. Neuroreport 5 (1993) 310-312
52. Näätänen R., et al. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology 30 (1993) 436-450
53. Näätänen R., et al. Automatic time perception in the human brain for intervals ranging from milliseconds to seconds. Psychophysiology 41 (2004) 660-663
54. Näätänen R., et al. Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): a review of the evidence. Psychophysiology 42 (2005) 25-32
55. Näätänen R., et al. The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 (2007) 2544-2590
56. N'Diaye K., et al. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings. Cogn. Brain Res. 21 (2004) 250-268
57. Paavilainen P., et al. Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology 38 (2001) 359-365
58. Pazo-Alvarez P., et al. MMN in the visual modality: a review. Biol. Psychol. 63 (2003) 199-236
59. Penney T.B. Modality differences in interval timing attention, clock speed, and memory. In: Meck W.H. (Ed). Functional and Neural Mechanisms of Interval Timing (2003), CRC Press, Boca-Raton, FL 209-233
60. Penney T.B., and Tourret S. Les effets de la modalité sensorielle sur la perception du temps [Modality effects in short interval timing]. Psychol. Française 50 (2005) 131-143
61. Penney T.B., et al. Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26 (2000) 1770-1787
62. Penney T.B., et al. Interval-timing deficits in individuals at high risk for schizophrenia. Brain Cogn. 58 (2005) 109-118
63. Picton T.W., et al. Human auditory sustained potentials: II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45 (1978) 198-210
64. Sams M., et al. Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 437-448
65. Schröger E., and Wolff C. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport 7 (1996) 3005-3008
66. Simons D.J. Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 (2000) 147-155
67. Wang Y.P., et al. Event-related potentials evoked by multi-feature conflict under different attentive conditions. Exp. Brain Res. 148 (2003) 451-457
68. Wearden J.H., et al. Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 51 (1998) 97-120
69. Wearden J.H., et al. When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59 (2006) 1709-1724
70. Wei J.H., et al. A modified oddball paradigm "cross-modal delayed response" and the research on mismatch negativity. Brain Res. Bull. 57 (2002) 221-230
71. Winkler I. Interpreting the mismatch negativity. J. Psychophysiol. 21 (2007) 147-163
72. Woldorff M.G., et al. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology 28 (1991) 30-42
73. Woods D.L., et al. Intermodal selective attention: I. Effects on event-related potentials to lateralized auditory and visual stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 82 (1992) 341-355